Am – I Remember the Devotion of Your Youth 2: 1-13

I Remember the Devotion of Your Youth
2: 1-13

I remember the devotion of your youth DIG: God pictures Isra’el as a bride. Why is it such an apt illustration? What does it reveal about YHVH’s message about marriage? How did the marriage start out? To what barren wilderness does the LORD refer? What went wrong? What did the priests and the false shepherds do that was so contrary to ADONAI’s intent? Where was Ha’Shem all that time? What effect did this have? What charges does God bring? Ba’al is Hebrew for master or lord. Who is Ba’al (see Judges 2:11-13)?

REFLECT: What emotions do you think ADONAI is trying to convey through these vivid pictures? This is spiritual adultery. How do you feel when cheated upon? Do you think YHVH is hurt any less by those He loves? When was the last time you found yourself in a hole of your own making? Are you still there? Or did you get out? Did you get out by your own best thinking or by the grace of God? What’s the lesson?

626 BC during the reign of Josiah

Here begins a series of brief oracles (divine communication or revelation), most of which seem to have come from Jeremiah’s early ministry. The first passage (2:1-13) contains two oracles that develop one thought. ADONAI contrasts Isra’el’s early devotion during the Exodus period with the apostasy after entering the Promised Land. The LORD calls upon the heavens to be shocked at this betrayal. The second oracle (2:14-19) shows the sad consequences of forsaking God. The third (2:20-28) defines Isra’el’s sin as idolatry. In the concluding oracle (2:29-37) YHVH tells how He has warned Isra’el, whom the prophet pictures as an adulterous wife. It is particularly in the oracles recorded in Chapters 2 and 3 of Jeremiah that we become aware of the links with Hosea both as to vocabulary and also ideas. Chapter 2 contains some of the finest poetry in the entire prophecy.28

A Divine Memory: Jeremiah’s first message confronted Jerusalem with her spiritual adultery. To emphasize this, the prophet contrasted Judah’s former devotion with her present waywardness. The word of the LORD came to me (2:1). No indication is given as to how the word of ADONAI came to Yirmeyahu, but like other prophets he had a strong sense of conveying the mind of God to His people. The Spirit spoke through the prophet. It was the way divine revelation came to mankind: For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Ruach HaKodesh (Second Peter 1:21).

Go and shout in the ears of Yerushalayim that this is what ADONAI says: I remember your devotion (Hebrew: chesed) when you were young; how, as a bride, you loved Me (2:2a CJB). The word remember here is not a word that is used in the TaNaKh to simply recall something, but to remember to one’s account so it may put one in a positive light afterwards (Nehemiah 5:19, 13:22-31; Psalms 106:45). As a result, here, ADONAI remembers something, and what He remembers is being placed in Isra’el’s account positively. And to some degree this positive element may offset some of the negative aspect of their relationship. God remembers three things: Isra’el’s devotion, their short honeymoon and their exodus through the wilderness.

Jeremiah follows Hosea’s reasoning and uses some of the same wording (Hosea 2:15, 9:10, 11:1-2). The mind of YHVH went back in memory to the days of Isra’el’s youth when she first entered into a covenant with Him. He intended that Isra’el should remember (Hebrew: zakar), and her great calendar of festivals were designed to keep that memory alive. The LORD recalled the unfailing devotion of Isra’el in her honeymoon period in the desert following her acceptance of His covenant. One is reminded of Hosea 1-3 where the husband-wife relationship between Hosea and Gomer is a picture of the relationship between Ha’Shem and Isra’el.

At the time of the exodus Isra’el followed ADONAI through the wilderness, through a land not sown (2:2b CJB). Isra’el wasn’t perfect (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click Cn When They Came to Marah the Water was Bitter), but God was gracious to her and for the most part she had remained faithful as a nation. The measure of Isra’el’s loyalty and devotion in those early days was that she ventured into the wilderness, an open area that had not been sown. This was in contrast to what she had known in Egypt with its tilled land and abundant crops. But strong confidence in YHVH led Isra’el to follow Him into such unfamiliar territory, so deeply did she trust Him.29 After beginning with a marital metaphor, Jeremiah moves briefly to an agricultural metaphor.

Isra’el had been set apart as holy to the LORD (Exodus 19:6, 22:31 and 28:36), the first fruits of His harvest (2:3a). Rashi explains that the phrase first fruits refers to the first portion taken from the new crop, such as the wave-offering (see my commentary on Exodus Gj Take the Other Ram, and Aaron and His Sons will Lay Their Hands on Its Head), which must be brought to the Temple as sacred and not eaten by the farmer. As the first fruits of the field are sacred, so is Isra’el, the first-fruits set apart to God. The mention of first fruits implies that He expects a later harvest of the goyim.

All who devoured her were held guilty, and disaster overtook them (see my commentary on Exodus Cv The Amalekites Came and Attacked the Israelites at Rephidim). Although it was Jeremiah’s belief that those nations were carrying out God’s will, he knew that they were not motivated by any high or noble motive. For them it was simply a matter of aggression and lust for conquest, for which they would be punished. And disaster overtook them declares the LORD (2:3b). There is a principle written into Scripture that has held true down through the centuries. It was first told to Abram, but it still holds true today. ADONAI said: I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse (Genesis 12:3a). The contrast between this beautiful state and the sad unfaithfulness of the years that followed are reported next.

On Changing Gods: Hear the word of ADONAI, you descendants of Jacob, all you clans of Isra’el. This is what YHVH says: What fault did your ancestors find in Me, that they strayed so far from Me? God committed no wrong in the relationship. So the tone of the initial question is like the hurt of a wounded lover. They followed worthless idols and became worthless themselves. Isra’el had gone after the gods of Canaan and in the process became as useless to God as a rotten loincloth (see DxA Linen Loincloth). The apple of His eye had become like the gods she served (Psalm 115:8). The Hebrew word hebel is the same as used in Ecclesiastes and there it is regularly translated meaningless, pointless or vanity. It conveys vapor or unreality, an appearance that has no real substance.30 Not only was the honeymoon over . . . the whole relationship had fundamentally changed. What had been a happy marriage and a joyous offering had been deeply perverted, seemingly beyond repair.

What makes idols worthless? The short answer is that they are not divine and cannot save. Idols are a substitute for the real thing: counterfeit gods. Today it seems that people are not without their little gods of religious activity. Instead of believing in nothing, they are tempted to believe a little in everything in their search for “solutions” in this life. They search for the god within, and thus, worship themselves. Worthless!

They did not ask, “Where is ADONAI, who brought us up out of Egypt and led us through the barren wilderness, through a land of deserts and ravines, a land of drought and utter darkness, a land where no one travels and no one lives? Isra’el forgot their gracious delivery out of Egypt. He said: I brought you into a fertile Land to eat its fruit and rich produce. Ha’Shem, unlike Isra’el was true to His word. How good the relationship used to be! But you came and defiled My Land with idol worship and made My inheritance detestable (2:4-7). How things had changed!

Then the LORD gives the indictment against Isra’el . . . The priests Levites did not ask, “Where is the LORD?” Those who deal with the Torah did not know Me (2:8a). Their whole relationship with Elohim was reduced to nothing (Hosea 4:4-10). False shepherds (23:1) rebelled against Me. Priests no longer provided serious leadership. Judges forgot the central commitment to justice. Rulers forgot that power is a trust from YHVH. Jeremiah discerned the collapse of public institutions.

The prophets prophesied by Ba’al and followed worthless idols (2:8b), and broke both the first and second commandments (Exodus 20:3-4). Isaiah mocked the making of these worthless idols (see my commentary on Isaiah Hy Worship the LORD, Not Idols). Despite various revivals under Asa, Hezekiah and Josiah, the people continually reverted to the deities and rituals of Canaan. Here ADONAI raises the deeply personal matter in a highly intense and emotional way. An intimate relationship had been broken down, and this had produced strong feelings of anger and hurt on God’s part. This is a divine lament, and to hear it in these opening verses is important to the interpretation of the scroll as a whole. So Yirmeyahu begins with a portrayal of YHVH in deep anguish and pain.31

Having clearly shown the faithlessness of the people, Jeremiah used an image of a court case to focus on the seriousness of Isra’el’s sin. Therefore, I bring charges (Hebrew: rib, a legal term for filing a lawsuit as in Micah 6:1-2) against you again, declares ADONAI. And I will bring charges against your children’s children (2:9). If the audience thought it could get off by agreeing with the failures of the Eli priesthood, to scribes over the years who wrote about YHVH but did not know him, to irreligious kinds from Jeroboam son of Nebat (First Kings 11:26) to the more recent Manasseh, and to hordes of Ba’al and Asherah prophets who earned their place at Jezebel’s table by prophesying homegrown nonsense . . . they were wrong. Ha’Shem’s complaint was with those listening to the oracle, and more sadly still, to their grandchildren. The LORD said very plainly, “My complaint is with you!”32

The prophet asked the Israelites to go on a “field trip” to observe the faithfulness of the Gentiles. Whether they went to the coasts of Cyprus in the west or to Kedar (north Arabian desert tribes) in the east, the results would always be the same. No pagan society had ever changed its gods (Yet they are not gods at all)? The idolatrous nations surrounding Isra’el were more faithful to their false gods than Isra’el had been to the true Master of the universe.33 But, the LORD lamented, My people have exchanged their glorious God for worthless idols. They were not able to determine what was real and unreal, what was true and false, and what was life giving and death dealing (Romans 1:20-25). Heaven and earth function as witnesses (Isaiah 1:2) who guarantee oaths and who observe patterns of faithfulness and fickleness. Because heaven and earth know YHVH to be the One True God (Psalm 96:11), Isra’el’s despicable response to ADONAI is exposed for what it is. In this cosmic court there is no doubt about who is the guilty party. Be appalled at this, you heavens (Deuteronomy 32:1), and shudder with great horror, declares the LORD (2:10-12).

On living water: The poem introduces the metaphor of living water and empty cisterns. My people have committed two sins. Note that in spite of their sins, God calls Isra’el my people (2:11, 13, 31-32) and children (3:14, 22) and is still identified as your God (2:17,19) and your Master (3:14). Once again, the exiled Israelites are in view here. First, ADONAI says: They have forsaken Me, the spring of living water (2:13a).

And, second, God laments: They have dug their own cisterns, broken cisterns that cannot hold water (2:13b). The dryness of the summer months in Palestine, and the absence of large rivers, together with the scarcity of springs in many places, makes it necessary to collect into cisterns the rains which fall, and the waters which fill the small streams in the rainy season. This has been the custom in that land from very early times. These cisterns are either dug in the earth or cut out of the soft limestone rock, and there are several kinds. Sometimes a shaft is sunk like a well, and the bottom widened into the shape of a jug. Digs of this sort combine the characteristics of cisterns and wells, since they not only receive the rain that is conducted into them, but the water that percolates through the limestone. Another kind consists of chambers excavated out of the rock, with a hole in the roof. Again, an excavation is made perpendicularly, and the roof arched with masonry. Some are lined with wood or cement, while others are left in their natural state.

Sometimes they are entirely open at the top, and are then entered by steps, or, in the case of large ones (and some are very large), by flights of stairs. When they are roofed, a circular opening with a lip at the top, and a pulley, with a rope and bucket is provided. This is referred to in Ecclesiastes 12:6, and the pulley is broken at the cistern.34 With proper care the water may be kept sweet for a time; however, even with the best of care, even those hewn from solid rock are bound to crack. So the water collected from the clay roofs or from marly soil has the color of weak soapsuds, the taste of the earth or the stable, is full of worms, in filthy condition, and not to be compared with the pure water from living fountains. At any time the cisterns are liable to break and leak. So these cisterns are now broken and they cannot hold water. This is one of the images of apostasy that we will see in Chapter 2.

This verse is one of the most beautiful and meaningful passages in the entire prophecy; it is applicable today. People still turn from the life-giving source and, with incredible labor, make substitutes that inevitably disappoint them. The verse continues an earlier thought, those who pursue worthlessness become worthless themselves (2:5). A thirsty person who turns to an empty cistern will become even more thirsty.35 There will surely be a plucking up and a tearing down of one so faithless, who in this poem is none other than Yerushalayim.

Yeshua returned to the living water metaphor with a Samaritan woman at Jacob’s well when He said: Everyone who drinks this water (from Jacob’s well) will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the [living] water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life (John 4:13-14). And later at the last and greatest day of Sukkot, He declared: Let anyone who is thirsty come to Me and drink. Whoever believes in Me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them. By this He meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were later to receive. Up to that time the Holy Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified (John 7:37b-39).

Such a critique of the life of God’s people invites every generation of His people to reexamine its own commitments. As is common with the prophets, the criticisms of Yirmeyahu here do more than explain what was wrong in his own day, they also intend to ask subsequent generations to examine our lives and witness.

2021-05-12T11:25:06+00:000 Comments

Al – The Faithlessness of Judah 2:1 to 3:5

The Faithlessness of Judah
2:1 to 3:5

During the reign of Josiah

The flow of thought within this unit basically consists of an opening divine memory of the “honeymoon” with Isra’el (2:1-3), followed by an explosion of metaphors – especially the marital metaphor – that speaks with great intensity about the breakdown of the marriage (2:4 to 3:5). This material interweaves reflections, questions, accusations, complaints about enemies, and other matters, as is characteristic of human laments (see Psalm 13).

Nearly every indictment that ADONAI brings up in this section has to do with either the first (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click Dk You Shall Have No Other Gods Before Me), or second commandment (see the commentary on Exodus Dl You Shall Not Make For Yourselves an Idol). Only in 2:34 do issues of social justice come into play. Only when the issue of the relationship with God has been clearly laid out as the fundamental problem do such symptoms of that brokenness appear (here and later). The marital metaphor assumes both promise and commitment on the part of both parties. The indictment focuses on the breaking of this commitment by Isra’el by committing spiritual adultery with other gods. Given this focus, little is said about future judgment (2:36-37), and even Babylon is not specifically in view. That will come later (20:4-6), but now the call to repentance is front and center (3:11-14), and a promised future is stated very clearly (3:15-18).

This section presents an anatomy of evil, documented with evidence from past and present sins.26 This is a vivid picture of the fallen nature of mankind. As presently situated prior to the calls for repentance in 3:6 to 4:4, this material is preaching designed to elicit repentance, not to write Isra’el’s epitaph. The point here was not to merely dwell on the past (though that was necessary), but to chart some possible ways of moving forward together. By the time this was being read by the exiles, judgment had already fallen. But Jeremiah’s message meant that ADONAI still wanted a relationship with them and whatever measure of judgment they had experienced, God had not rejected them. At the same time, Ha’Shem was profoundly concerned about their faithfulness in the relationship.27

2021-01-01T14:32:46+00:000 Comments

Ak – Judah’s Guilt and Punishment 2:1 to 6:30

Judah’s Guilt and Punishment
2:1 to 6:30

Judah’s guilt and punishment REFLECT: Choose one verse or phrase from these chapters that stands out to you. This could be something you’re intrigued by, something that makes you uncomfortable, something that puzzles you, something that resonates with you, or just something you want to examine further. Write a paragraph about it.

During the reign of Josiah

In 627 BC God sent Jeremiah to Jerusalem to give a series of messages to the people of Judah. Following the account of Yirmeyahu’s commission is a collection of oracles, prose and poetic, that seems to have come mainly from his early ministry midway through the reign of Josiah who was the most receptive of all the kings to his radical message. Despite much repetition, a progression of thought can be discerned. God’s people have been faithless (2:1-37). The Lord calls His people to return (shuwb) to Him (3:1 to 4:4). ADONAI warns that if His people fail to return (shuwb), He must punish them by sending an enemy from the north (4:5-31). Then the next chapter restates the faithlessness of YHVH’s people and warns again about the invasion (5:1-31), and the final chapter (6:1-30) sums up the dreaded message of the whole section. These chapters deal with the near total apostasy of Judah and the inevitable foreign invasion that served as ADONAI’s retribution.

The portrait of Jeremiah that began to emerge in the first chapter is enriched. We see the prophet maturing before our eyes, from the youth who pled his inexperience (1:6), through the eager preacher, calling expectantly for a verdict (3:22), then the careful searcher who seeks facts, not emotional opinion (5:1). We see the grief of Yirmeyahu endured as God’s messenger (4:19). We see him close to the breaking point as he tries to keep his anger . . . Ha’Shem’s anger . . . held in check (6:1). And finally we see his mature realization of his role. He is ADONAI’s assayer, who discovers that Judah, instead of silver, is slag metal (6:27-30). The priest from Anathoth remains a timid man who shrinks from conflict, but he has a message to deliver, and he attempts to deliver it, whatever the cost.

But more importantly, we begin to see the portrait of God emerging from the shadows. We see Ha’Shem’s stern inflexible purpose that Amos portrayed, with the divine concern for clean hands and a pure heart rather than correct ceremony. We see the bruised love that Hosea portrayed, the love of a husband whose wife had deceived and betrayed him, yet he keeps on loving her. And we begin in this section to see the LORD’s pain when His people sin. Philosophical theology doesn’t know quite how to handle this divine pain; it doesn’t fit into any system . . . so much the worse for philosophical theology. Yirmeyahu knew ADONAI, and his words help us to know the God who grieves when we go our own way.25

2021-05-07T21:59:19+00:000 Comments

Aj – The Call of Jeremiah 1: 4-19

The Call of Jeremiah
1: 4-19

The call of Jeremiah DIG: How do you think the word of ADONAI came to Jeremiah? How far back does God’s relationship with Jeremiah go? How involved was YHVH in preparing Yirmeyahu (Jeremiah)? How does God’s call make the prophet feel? How old is Jeremiah? What does HaShem say to Jeremiah to confirm his call? What did He do to him? What two object lessons did ADONAI give him? Upon what pun does the first depend? What does the second mean? Why is the LORD going to punish His people? What opposition will Yirmeyahu face in his ministry? What does he need to overcome it? What does ADONAI promise to do for him? How does Jeremiah’s call compare to Ezekiel’s call?

REFLET: It is evident from Scripture that people hear God when He speaks. I don’t think we have to insist it was in the same way that Samuel heard Him. How do you hear ADONAI? Is it a still small voice like Elijah (First Kings 19:12)? Or do you hear Ha’Shem through Scripture? Are His plans for you always clear, sometimes clear or never clear? When have you sensed the LORD being with you during times of trouble? How do you feel knowing YHVH is watching you? Frightened? Secure? Why? Do you ever plead inadequacy in order to avoid getting involved with what God has called you to do?

627 BC during the reign of Josiah

“I am not made for perilous quests,” cried Frodo. “I wish I had never seen the Ring! Why did it come to me? Why was I chosen?” “Such questions cannot be answered,” said Gandalf. “You may be sure that it was not for any merit that others do not possess; not for power or wisdom, at any rate. But you have been chosen and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have.”
J. R. R. Tolkien, Fellowship of the Ring 15

For every believer, the concept of a divine call should be basic to the understanding of our faith. The call of Abram (see the Genesis, to see link click DtI Will Bless Those Who Bless You and Whoever Curses You I Will Curse) at the beginning of patriarchal history is the pivotal event referred to by Stephen at the beginning of his speech to the Great Sanhedrin (see the commentary on The Life of Christ LgThe Great Sanhedrin) in Acts 7.

Adherents of all other religions are asked to reach out to God, but the Bible describes God as reaching out to us, searching for us, calling us. Elsewhere the direction of the call is from down upward, as people seem to touch God in their own strength and through their own devices, building towers of Babel in uninvited attempts to storm the strongholds of heaven. But in Scripture the direction of the call is reversed. The call begins in the heavens and moves down to mankind. That that difference alone is enough to expose every man-made-religion as diametrically opposed to biblical faith. The call of each prophet or deliverer in the TaNaKh occurred in a historical context that was usually precipitated by a national crisis. For Moshe it was the Egyptian crisis, for Gideon it was the Midianite crisis, and for Jeremiah it was Babylonian crisis that was destined to bring the kingdom of Judah to ruin.16

About ten years before the death of Manasseh – the most wicked king ever to sit on Judah’s throne – a fateful event took place in the land of Judah. There was nothing spectacular about it, and no one at the time could have recognized its profound significance for the nation. The event was the birth of a male child in the house of Hilkiah, one of the priests of Anathoth, a little town located slightly more than an hour’s walk northeast of Jerusalem in the territory of Benjamin.

The boy was preordained by God to become one of the greatest prophets of Isra’el in the TaNaKh, but at the time his father knew nothing of that. He decided to give his son the relatively common and lackluster name of Yirmeyahu.

The early years of Jeremiah’s life were crucial politically for Judah. Manasseh died in due course, and when, after only two years of rule, Amon, Manasseh’s son and successor, was murdered by palace servants, the assassination must have left its mark on the impressionable mind of the young Yirmeyahu.

With the accession of good King Josiah, however, the boy lived out the rest of his teenage years in a fair degree of peace and serenity. But “a boy’s will is the wind’s will, and the thoughts of youth are long, long thoughts.” Jeremiah was pleased with the religious situation as he found it in his hometown. His father was a priest of ADONAI, which made Jeremiah a “PK,” a “priest’s kid,” the equivalent of the modern-day “preacher’s kid.”

The priest from Anathoth turned out so well in later life that his father must have been the kind of man in whose word “discipline” loomed large. Hilkiah doubtless taught his son the Ten Commandments, and to love ADONAI his God with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength (Deuteronomy 6:5), and to love his neighbor as himself (Leviticus 19:18), and not to walk in the step of the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers (Psalm 1:1).

The stern and dignified and unyielding character of Yirmeyahu’s later life assures us, from the human standpoint, that his father had learned the secret of disciplining him in love. Fond memories of those early years in his home must have strengthened Jeremiah and given him solace and comfort as he went about the difficult task that ADONAI commissioned him to perform. And what was that task? Yirmeyahu was to be a spokesman for God.

As a young man, Jeremiah had seen many of the evil results of pagan worship, and he perhaps longed to do something to foster and further the worship the God of his father’s. But we can be sure that he had no idea of the fearful responsibility the LORD was about to place on his shoulders.16 I like to think that, like his earlier kinsman Moshe, Yirmeyahu received his commission and made his commitment in a quiet retreat, far from the hustle and bustle of the city. When Moses received his call it was on the far side of the desert near the burning bush, at Mount Sinai. Perhaps with Jeremiah it was in a similar place. But as far as we know, the appearance of YHVH to His prophet was not nearly so spectacular as it had been to Moshe; there was no burning bush or other startling visible phenomenon.

Although Yirmeyahu did not see or feel anything, at least not at first, he heard the voice of the LORD speaking. The prophet would later write: The word of ADONAI came to me, using four verbs of calling. The four verbs all have I (ADONAI) as their subject and the suffix you (Jeremiah) as their object. God said: Before . . .

I formed you in the womb: you are mine by virtue of creation. The verb form is regularly used to describe the work of a craftsman, especially a potter (18:1-6), and Genesis 2:7 comes to mind: Then ADONAI, God, formed a man (Hebrew: adam) from the dust of the ground (Hebrew: adamah) and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, so that he became a living being. Creation by God was an element in the call of Jeremiah, who was thereby predestined to the prophetic office before he was born. The verb formed is assumed by the other three verbs and serves as the vital pedestal on which they stand.

I formed you in the womb, I knew you: you are mine by choice. This turns everything we ever thought we knew about God around. We think that God is an object about which we have questions. We are curious about YHVH. We make inquiries about Him. We read books about God. We get into deep theological discussions about ADONAI. We drop into shul or church from time to time to see what is going on with God. We indulge in an occasional sunset or symphony to cultivate a feeling of reverence for YHVH. But that is not the reality of our lives with God. Long before we ever got around to asking questions about the LORD, He has been questioning us. Long before we got interested in the subject of God, He subjected us to the most intensive and searching knowledge. Before it ever crossed our minds that God might be important, ADONAI singled us out as important. Before we were formed in the womb, God knew us . . . We are known before we know.17

I set you apart: you are mine by virtue of consecration. ADONAI says He set Jeremiah apart. The underlying Hebrew root is usually translated holy, as in Yirmeyahu 2:3, where Isra’el is depicted as holy to the LORD, when she was in the bloom of her youth, early in her history. The words describing someone’s call in the TaNaKh often use the word holy: Moses was told to remove his sandals because the place where he was standing was holy ground (Exodus 3:5), and Isaiah heard seraphs calling to one another, Holy, holy, holy is ADONAI-Tzva’ot (Isaiah 6:3). To approach God’s presence, or to serve Him, one must be made holy, consecrated, set apart or sanctified by YHVH (Exodus 19:14). Jeremiah was set apart that he might be able to prophesy to people who, though once holy, were no longer so.

I appointed you as a prophet to the nations (1:4-5): you are mine by commission. ADONAI says He appointed Yirmeyahu as a prophet to the nations. The underlying Hebrew root is usually translated gave, the meaning appointed is a nuance in the sense of put or placed. In Jeremiah’s case, choice and consecration were followed by commission, a special commission as a prophet to the nations (Chapters 25, 46-51). Far from being restricted to only prophesying to Isra’el, Yirmeyahu’s mission was to be worldwide. Such a divine appointment could not but be expected to produce such a reluctant response . . . a negative response . . . from the priest from Anathoth.

With God in your world, you aren’t an accident or an incident; you are a gift to the world. You are a divine work of art, signed by the Master. Like a famous painter who signs her name at the bottom of a magnificent painting, ADONAI has signed His name on you with the Ruach HaKodesh. He has anointed us, set His seal of ownership on us, and put His Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come (Second Corinthians 1:21b-22). We are His works of art. We are created in His image to do good deeds. However, we are significant, not because of what we do, but because of who we are.18

Even though Jeremiah had been anxious to do his part, was not Ha’Shem asking a bit too much? How could a priest from Anathoth be a prophet to the nations? What academic credentials could he produce that would qualify him for such a high position? What fame did he possess that would command the attention and respect of the nations? He had two objections.

First, Jeremiah said: Ah (Hebrew: ’aha, a term that expresses dismay or alarm; and even more, actually conveys opposition to divine self-disclosure), Adonai ELOHIM, I don’t even know how to speak (1:6a)! When we hear this, we think of Moshe. At the burning bush Moses had also given his lack of eloquence, his inability to articulate his thoughts with precision, as a reason that he hoped would release him from the responsibility of leading his people out of bondage in Egypt (see the commentary on Exodus AvI Am Slow of Speech and Tongue). Like Moses, Yirmeyahu was no eager prophet!

Second, he reasoned: I’m just a young man (1:6b)! The Hebrew word naar may mean a child or an infant as we see in Exodus 2:6 and First Samuel 4:21, but it can also mean a young man of marriageable age. The latter, of course, is intended here. Jeremiah may have been in his late teens or early twenties when God called him. Isaiah said: Here am I. Send me (Isaiah 6:8b)! But Yirmeyahu wasn’t quite so anxious, he said, “I’m too inexperienced!” Since wisdom came with experience and age in the ancient world, how could ADONAI expect Jeremiah, as young as he was, to accept such a daunting task?

Centuries later, how could Rabbi Sha’ul expect the young Timothy to set an example for the believers in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity (First Timothy 4:12)? Can one suppose that such a young man will flee the evil desires of youth, and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, along with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart (Second Timothy 2:22)?

Yirmeyahu would someday learn not to boast in wisdom, strength, or riches, but rather to boast about his understanding of the LORD and His kindness, justice and righteousness (Jeremiah 9:23-24). But for now his response was characterized by the timid reluctance that usually comes with youth and immaturity.

YHVH’s words of reassurance to Jeremiah not only repeat in essence the content of the divine call but also responded to his twofold objection. Verses 7-9 parallel verses 17-19. And in addition, verses 7-9 echo Deuteronomy 18:18 in such a remarkable way that they assuredly reflect Yirmeyahu’s consciousness of being a prophet like Moshe. Each following verse of the LORD’s reassurance to His prophet is a distinct unit.

Divine authority: But ADONAI said to me, “Don’t say, ‘I’m just a young man.’ You must go to everyone I send you to and say whatever I command you” (1:7). To Jeremiah’s objection that he is just a young man, the LORD responds that He will give him the courage to go to everyone he is sent to. And to Yirmeyahu’s objection that he doesn’t even know how to speak, YHVH responds that He will give him the ability to say whatever he is commanded to. “Never mind that you a merely a young man, I am with you!

Divine presence: To Jeremiah’s timidity, Ha’Shem responds with the command: Do not be afraid of them, for I am with you and will rescue you, declares the LORD (1:8). The form of reassurance is significant. In his mission Jeremiah will not be free from danger and hardship; but God will be his Rescuer. The latter phrase is repeated in 1:19, a phenomenon evident also in the call of Gideon (Judges 6:12 and 16) and in a profoundly important theological context, the account of the call of Moshe (Exodus 3:12 and 14), where it is linked to the most intimate form of the divine name: I AM Who I AM.

The readers of Yirmeyahu would be able to see themselves and their recent history as the key reason for Jeremiah’s call. The prophet was called because of them! The readers are the “them” of verse 8, when God said: Don’t be afraid of them! They are the ones who threatened God’s prophet and from whom he must be rescued (1:18-19). The readers are those who worshiped other gods and became the object of God’s judgment in and through other nations (1:15-16). With this visionary introduction, readers would be able to see more clearly that it was their apostasy that had caused their own judgment. At the same time, Jeremiah’s call holds up a word of hope for them; its subject is ADONAI.19

God, as the great I am, doesn’t intend by that name to teach us about His undeniable existence but to assure us of His gracious, protecting, and permanent presence. As Immanuel, God With Us, He guarantees that He will never leave us or forsake us. Central in the three sentences of divine reassurance, the Immanuel theme is also a central feature of Scripture as a whole. For example, Matthew begins his gospel by presenting Yeshua Messiah as God with us (Mattityahu 1:23) and concludes it by recording Jesus’ words: I am with you always (Matthew 28:20). The Bible begins with ADONAI, God, creating mankind for fellowship (Genesis 1:18, 2:7 and 3:8) and ends with John’s prayer: The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God’s people (Revelation 22:21).

Divine touch: Then ADONAI reached out His hand and touched my mouth and said to me, “I have put My words in your mouth” (1:9). Analogous to the seraphs touching the sinful lips of Isaiah (Isaiah 6:6-7), ADONAI responds to Yirmeyahu’s professed lack of speaking ability by symbolically touching his mouth. The Hebrew word put is literally given, also found in Deuteronomy 18:18 and Jeremiah 5:14 in this sense. God had given Jeremiah to be a prophet to the nations (1:5), so now He had given Yirmeyahu His words of assurance to help him fulfill his divinely ordained mission.20 In other words, “Just go where I tell you and repeat what I say to you. No experience is necessary!”

See, today I appoint you as an overseer over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant (1:10). Four of the metaphors are verbs of destruction and two metaphors are verbs of restoration. The ABCCBA chiasmus provides an explanation for the order of these verbs. The agricultural terms (A) enclose the construction terms (B), which in turn enclose the military terms (C). The first four metaphors are words of judgment on the nations, but the last two are words of salvation. From the beginning, the book of Jeremiah signals that the prophet’s word will not simply be about judgment, however powerful that word will prove to be. No word of judgment will be God’s final word to Isra’el.21

A to uproot,

B to tear down,

C to destroy,

C to overthrow,

B to build,

A to plant.

These verbs anticipate the whole message of Yirmeyahu. The prophet would clearly have preferred to speak about the building and planting, but he did comparatively little of this constructive preaching and a great deal of the destructive kind.22

How did Yirmeyahu make the transition from the shuffling, excuse-making: Ah, God I’m just a young man to the iron pillar career of accepting the assignment of a prophet? God equipped him for life by showing him two visions that led him from inadequacy to obedience.

The vision of the almond tree: As if out on a walk, the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah and said: What do you see, Yirmeyahu? “I see the branch of an almond tree,” he replied. ADONAI said to him, “You have seen correctly, for I AM watching to see that My word is fulfilled” (1:11-12). The almond tree is the first tree to blossom in Isra’el in the spring. When the white blossoms of the almond tree appear, the people know that spring is near. There is a word play, or pun, in the original language. The Hebrew word for watching sounds like the Hebrew word for almond tree. Shaqed means almond. The root of this word means to be awake, to be watchful, or to be alert. It became the name for the almond tree because it is the first shrub to awaken from the winters nap (but the last to bear fruit). The pink buds come out as early as January, with the fruit appearing in March. By that time the white almond blossoms fall like snow all over Isra’el. Shoqed means watching, being stirred to watch, or being awakened to watch.

It is easy to imagine Jeremiah both brooding over the whole issue of YHVH’s message to His people and wondering whether He would make the word come to pass. The prophet felt compelled to speak. Does this word, too, have power? But worrying and agonizing over this terrible question, Yirmeyahu found his attention caught by a glimpse of the almond tree. The glimpse came as an answer to his question, and the answer was in the form of a wordplay or pun. Consequently, when all seems dormant, God is watching, ready to fulfill His word. As spring always follows the blossoming of the almond tree, so ADONAI’s prophetic fulfillment would follow Jeremiah’s prophecies.23

During his long ministry, Yirmeyahu made some near historical prophecies and some far eschatological prophecies. One of the tests of a prophet was to make a near historical prophecy . . . and if that came true then the people could then trust his far eschatological prophecy as well. But if what a prophet proclaims in the name of ADONAI does not come true, that false prophet must be put to death (Deuteronomy 18:14-22). It wasn’t very daring to prophesy something 300 years after your death. So Jeremiah’s prophecies would eventually be fulfilled after a wait of some forty years. He lived in Tziyon when the end came, and he also made some far eschatological prophecies that we can count on. The point is, whatever Jeremiah prophecies, God is watching and will make sure that it is fulfilled because God gave him the prophecy in the first place.

The vision of the boiling pot: Jeremiah’s second vision is not concerned with the power behind the word from Ha’Shem but with the message, the content, of that word. Unfortunately, both what he sees and what it means are difficult to understand. The word of the LORD came to me again, “What do you see?” “I see a pot that is boiling,” I answered. “It is tilting toward us from the north” (1:13). This is the same kind of pot that Jacob was cooking when Esau came in and wanted some of his red stew. But this pot is tilted so that the scalding water was being spilled to the south. The village of Anathoth and the streets and courtyards of Jerusalem were directly in the path of its flow. ADONAI said to me, “From the north disaster will be poured out on all who live in the Land. I AM about to summon all the peoples of the northern kingdoms,” declares Ha’Shem. “Their kings will come and set up their thrones in the entrance of the gates of Jerusalem” (after the fall successive victorious kings will sit in formal judgment at the gates where trials were held, to determine what was to be done with the defeated population and their towns); they will come against all her surrounding walls and against all the towns of Judah (1:14-15).

Then God spells out the reason for the judgment: I will pronounce My judgments on My people because of their wickedness in forsaking Me, in burning incense to other gods and in worshiping what their (the reader’s) hands have made (1:16). The reference to idolatry signals to the reader that the first (see the commentary on Exodus DkYou Shall Have No Other Gods Before Me) and second commandments (see the commentary on Exodus DlYou Shall Not Make For Yourselves an Idol) are the key issue for ADONAI. All other sins cited along the way in Jeremiah are symptomatic of this split in the original readers’ relationship with God. Spiritual adultery or unfaithfulness is the most basic metaphor that the LORD will use for this breakup (see AtUnfaithful Isra’el). Yet, such a comment also recognizes the presence of a faithful remnant among the unfaithful majority.

At this point no specific nation is named, and will not be named until much later in the scroll. But the exiled readers of the book of Jeremiah knew exactly who the nation was because they were stuck in Babylon and not living in Judah! The point is that judgment is coming from the north that will destroy the Land. The reason for this judgment is the wickedness of the leadership and people of Isra’el. The rest of the book will merely add more details to these two visions. Yirmeyahu was shaped by the visions, not by the fashions of the day, not by his feelings about himself.

The charge: Yet, Jeremiah could fail (we can say “no” to God and make it stick). For his part, the prophet will need to get ready for battle. So YHVH says: Get yourself ready! Stand up and say to them whatever I command you. Courage, moral and physical, was an essential attribute of the true prophet; Nathan’s fearless accusation of David (Second Samuel 12:7) and Elijah’s undaunted rebuke of Ahab (First Kings 21:19) are examples.

At the same time, God assures Yirmeyahu that he is not alone in this task: Do not be terrified by them, or I will terrify you before them. Today I have made you a fortified city, an iron pillar and a bronze wall to stand against the whole land – against the kings of Judah (36:26), its officials (38:1-28), its priests (26:1-24) and the people of the Land (44:1-30). Jeremiah would, indeed, have to plough a lonely furrow, with all the sections of the nation against him. They will fight against you but will not overcome you, for I AM with you and will rescue you, declares ADONAI (1:17-19). But this is not a word that promises Yirmeyahu a trouble free life; indeed, Ha’Shem’s rescue implies that there will be trouble ahead.

Yirmeyahu was called to prophesy in the darkest hours of Judah, when she died as a nation. He is known as the “weeping prophet,” although a more appropriate name might be the “groaning prophet,” or the “complaining prophet.” Not for his trials, although they were burdensome, but for the sins of his nation and the destruction that was to come. No one else at the time comprehended the full significance of the judgment that awaited Judah. He knew that in a very short time the proud, beautiful city of Tziyon with its magnificent Temple would be in ruins, and his beloved people would be in captivity. He also knew that Isra’el would be exiled from the Land for a long time because of her sin. No wonder he wept.

Where Isaiah was bold and fearless, Jeremiah was gentle and compassionate. Where Isaiah lived more than one hundred years before the captivity of Judah, Yirmeyahu ministered just before and during the final catastrophe. Where Isaiah foretold of judgments that were coming unless the nation turned to God, Yirmeyahu notified the nation that their final judgment was at hand, and that ADONAI had (temporarily) rejected them and that nothing could save them from their punishment.

There does come a point when, to use a boating metaphor, Israel’s disastrous trip over the falls becomes inevitable. The prophet does discern when the pull of the waterfall makes it impossible to prevent the boat from going over, when those on the boat may not realize it (4:28 for example). But the calls for repentance in Jeremiah (3:11 to 4:4) suggest that a disastrous future was not necessarily in place from the beginning.

Indeed, the book of Yirmeyahu has continuing importance for readers then and now precisely because our futures are (normally) not set in stone and because a past word of God regarding repentance may once again prove to be a lively word of possibility. How people respond to the word of God does in fact shape their future, as well as the future of others. At the same time, there may come a point in the course of the lives of individuals or communities or nations when a certain kind of future does become inevitable, when it may be too late for repentance to shape the future in a positive way. But even if this disaster should occur, the remarkable word of Jeremiah is that no trip over the falls is final.

Judah’s God is the kind of God who picks the people up from the rocks below the falls and continues to be about the business of building and planting (1:10) for the future, even when there does not seem to be much left to work with. And, then, in this continuing journey down the river, the call to repentance remains important.24

2021-04-27T11:28:51+00:000 Comments

Ai – Josiah Ruled For 31 Years from 640 to 609 BC

Josiah Ruled For 31 Years from 640 to 609 BC

Josiah came to the throne at the tender age of eight, after the fifty-two year reign of his evil father Manasseh (Second Chronicles 33:1-25) and he reigned 31 years (Second Kings 22:1 to 23:30; Second Chronicles 34:1 to 35:27). Manasseh’s reign had been marked by political and religious regression. Politically the country was forced to submit to Assyria. The reforms started by Hezekiah had been forgotten the people had reverted to brazen idolatry, with all its impure orgies and gruesome rites practiced at the rural sanctuaries on every high hill and under every leafy tree. Superstition was rampant, interpreting omens and sorcery raised its ugly heads again, and human sacrifice was reintroduced. Manasseh himself making his own son pass through the fire of Molech. Temple worship was vigorously suppressed. Small wonder, then, that the worship of ADONAI and the study of the Torah had completely disappeared. Such was the sad state of affairs when Josiah was crowned king.

According to Second Kings 22-23 and Second Chronicles 34-35 a major reform took place in Judah during Josiah’s reign. According to Kings the entire reform – the purge of idol worship, the covenant renewal ceremony, and the celebration of Passover – took place in 622 BC. In the king’s eighteenth year, while the Temple was being repaired, the scroll of Deuteronomy was found by Hilkiah, the high priest, beneath an accumulation of rubbish. He handed it to Shaphan the scribe, who in turn read it to the king. This is sometimes called “the Second Torah” because it contains, or repeats, many of the commandments already found in the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers for a new generation (see the commentary on Deuteronomy Ai These are the Words Moses Spoke). The difference being that Deuteronomy takes many of the commandments in the other four books of Moses and puts them into a covenant system. It follows a format that was typical of covenants in the ancient world between a great king and lesser kings under him.

There were blessings spelled out for obedience, and cursings for disobedience in the scroll of Deuteronomy. Imagine the impact of that reading. Here is Josiah, disgusted with the evil of his father and determined to do something about it, but not knowing quite how. He had no blueprint, no direction, and no counsel. The only thing he inherited from his father was fifty-two years of wickedness. Now the king had this powerful scroll about the love of ADONAI and our worship of Him, clear definitions of what is right and wrong, and explicit directions on how to make moral decisions and conduct true worship.

Josiah realized the full extent of the people’s apostasy and what his father had done meant the curses of Deuteronomy were going to visit Judah unless something was done. The young king’s response was swift and commanding. He immediately put into action everything that he read. Now that he knew what true worship was, he banished every single vestige of false worship. The government-subsidized immorality was wiped out. The cult prostitutes who had special housing in the Temple were banished. The magicians and sorcerers who had set up shop in the Temple precincts were scattered. Josiah dispatched his representatives throughout Y’hudah announcing what was discovered in this scroll. Old altars were torn down and the people taught the way of faith. The muck of a half-century of corruption was shoveled out of the City, out of the Land. So in the twelfth year of his reign (629/628 BC) Josiah began a revival throughout the country (Second Kings 23:1-5, 20-21, 24), one year before Jeremiah was called to his prophetic ministry.

After the scroll of Deuteronomy was found, a covenant renewal ceremony was performed. All the false gods and images of the southern kingdom of Judah (the same ones as were in the northern kingdom of Isra’el who had already been taken away into captivity by Assyria) were destroyed. Moreover, Josiah destroyed the two golden calves in Dan and Bethel (First Kings 12:28) that had been set up by Jeroboam. The rural sanctuaries were dismantled and their priests disqualified from officiating in the Temple, though to prevent them from forming a separate religious party, and perhaps also on humanitarian grounds, they were granted an allowance. The Temple was purified and Josiah ordered the national observance of Pesach.

The reform was accomplished. Everything that a king’s commands could do were done: conspicuous crime was stopped; superstitious religion was sent packing; immoral worship was banned. And Jeremiah had a ringside seat in the arena of reform. But getting rid of evil did not make the people good. It didn’t take him long to realize that the reform was only skin-deep. Everything had changed, but nothing had changed. The outward changes had been enormous; the inward changes were hardly noticeable.13

The reform, however, lasted only as long as Josiah lived. Jeremiah had no doubt enthusiastically welcomed the reform, but he was soon chagrined when he realized its superficial character and how quickly the people reverted to their idolatrous abuses. The spiritual condition took a dramatic turn for the worse and was a sorry state of affairs for what remained of the once proud Isra’el. Her demise came quickly.

In 632 BC in the eighth year of his reign, while he was still young, Josiah began to seek the God of his father David (Second Chronicles 34:3a).

In 629/628 BC in his twelfth year he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem of high places, Asherah poles and idols (Second Chronicles 34:3b).

In 627 BC Jeremiah was appointed as a prophet to the nations (1:4-5). He prophesied for about 45 years, about the same length of time Isaiah did.

In 626/625 BC Babylon became independent of Assyria and Nabopolassar became king.

In 622 BC during the king’s eighteenth year, the scroll of Deuteronomy was found in the Temple.

By 616 BC Egypt and Assyria were becoming allies as Babylon grew in power.

In 612 BC Nineveh was overthrown by a coalition of Babylonians, Medes and Scythians. Consequently, Assyria moved its capital to Harran.

In 612 BC After Nineveh fell, the Assyrian Empire was on the decline. This, along with Babylon’s rise created a realignment of power throughout the region. If a weakened Assyria could be maintained as a buffer state to halt Babylon’s westward advances, Egypt would be free to reclaim much of western Palestine, including Judah, which she had lost to Assyria earlier. Though Egypt had always feared a powerful Assyria, she was now faced with an even more powerful Babylon. So Egypt entered the conflict between Assyria and Babylon as Assyria’s ally. After Nineveh fell in 612 BC the Assyrians moved their refugee government 240 miles west to Haran in Upper Mesopotamia. Two years later, in 610 BC, the Babylonian army drove the Assyrians from Haran as well.

At this point a new Pharaoh, Necho II, ascended the throne of Egypt. He decided that the Babylonian presence at Haran was too close for comfort, so the following spring the Egyptian army marched north to try to support the remaining Assyrian forces in a last ditch attempt to retake their crumbling empire. Josiah had no liking for the march of an Egyptian army through his realm, particularly when the Egyptians were coming to the aide of Assyria, Judah’s old enemy. He therefore, attempted to block the progress of the Egyptian army at Megiddo (about fifty-five miles north of Jerusalem). But in 609 BC Josiah died at the hands of the Egyptians on the plain of Megiddo. This entire scene is summarized in a single verse in Second Kings 23:29. The news must have stunned Judah: here a king who was unparalleled in goodness (Second Kings 23:25), was struck down at the age of thirty-nine: Second Chronicles 35:20-35 records that his death was commemorated for generations.14

This event was more than a political setback. Those who practiced idolatry saw the king’s death to be a judgment upon Josiah for the gods banished by him, and so his defeat and death further undermined his reforms and gave a renewed impetus to idol-worship. Judah would then be in a spiritual death spiral that would last the entirety of Jeremiah’s forty-five-year ministry.

Unable to defeat the Babylonians at Haran, the Egyptians withdrew and the Assyrian influence over the Near East became insignificant by 609 BC (to see link click Gu Seventy Years of Imperial Babylonian Rule).

2021-04-22T10:38:01+00:000 Comments

Ah – The Introduction to Jeremiah 1:1-3

The Introduction to Jeremiah
1: 1-3

The introduction to Jeremiah DIG: Why is it significant that Jeremiah is described as a young man? How might this have affected the manner in which his message was delivered? Received? What does God’s decision to use a young man for such a big important task teach us about YHVH? What was Jeremiah’s occupation? What does his name mean? What can you conclude about his family? His hometown? When did Josiah rule? What kind of a king was Josiah? Manasseh? When did Zedekiah reign? How long did Jeremiah prophesy? What was the fruit of his ministry? Who were his contemporaries? How did he die?

REFLECT: Jeremiah never married or had any children. What sacrifices have you made for the Lord in your lifetime? Do you think Yirmeyahu ever resented his sacrifices? Have you resented yours? Why or why not? The prophet proclaimed the word of God through one of the worst times in Isra’el’s history, but he stuck with it. What keeps you ministering through the tough times? Do you stick with it? Why?

These are the words of Jeremiah (1:1a). In most cases the prophets open their books with the singular, “the word of ADONAI,” but in this case he uses the plural because in Yirmeyahu we will have both prophecy (the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians) and history (many of the Jews being carried off to Babylon in exile in 586 BC). So the plural words indicate that God inspired both the prophetic and historical sections. The only other prophet that uses this in the plural is Amos (Amos 1:1), and like Jeremiah, his book contains both prophetic and historical sections.

Yirmeyahu was a fairly common name at that time because we know of at least nine other people in the TaNaKh that had the same name. Two of which we find in the book of Jeremiah itself, not counting the prophet. The name Yirmeyahu comes from a Hebrew root that has several options of meaning: to hurl, to exalt, or to appoint. His name is constructed with several of the letters that make up the name YHVH. So his name could mean YHVH hurls, YHVH exalts, or YHVH appoints. And throughout his book there will be emphasis placed on each of these aspects.

The only thing we know about his family is that he was the son of Hilkiah (1:1b), which means YHVH is a portion. In Jeremiah’s day the high priest was named Hilkiah, but it wasn’t the same man because that man lived in Yerushalayim, while the prophet lived in Anathoth. It is not known for sure, but there is an interesting conjecture when David became king of Judah. Abiathar served as high priest until David’s death (see the commentary on The Life of Christ, to see link click Cv – The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath). But unfortunately he supported Prince Adonijah over Prince Solomon who had received David’s blessing to be king. Therefore, Abiathar was removed from the priesthood (the sole historical instance of the deposition of a high priest) and banished to his home in Anathoth by King Solomon (First Kings 2:26). It could be that Hilkiah, Jeremiah’s father, was a descendant of that exiled priest.

One of the priests at Anathoth (1:1c). The fact that Yirmeyahu’s father was a priest tells us that he was from the tribe of Levi. So Jeremiah was both a prophet and a priest. We also learn from Chapter 16 that he was never married and never had any children (see Co You Must Not Marry and Have Sons and Daughters).

The name of his hometown, Anathoth, came from the Canaanite goddess Anath. As the wife of Baal, she was one of the most vicious and violent goddesses that the Canaanites worshiped. She supposedly went on a rampage against mankind and no detail was omitted as she strode into battle with her club and bow. “Under Anath flew heads like vultures. Over her flew severed hands like locusts. She plunged knee-deep in the blood of her enemies; neck deep in the gore of the adversary. Anath laughed, and her heart was filled with joy, for she is victorious.”

In the territory of Benjamin (1:1d). Anathoth is about three miles north of Tziyon, and from a hill in the town you can actually see the Holy City. It was a Levitical city for the tribe of Benjamin (Joshua 21:18; First Chronicles 6:16). The Levites had no territory of their own and there were too many of them to all serve at the Temple, so they also functioned as the teachers of the TaNaKh for the eleven other tribes of Isra’el. After Moshe finished writing his five books, not everyone would possess a personal copy of them. So the tribe of Levi was not only responsible for preserving the Scriptures, but also for teaching them. Therefore, ADONAI instructed each tribe to assign specific cities within their boundaries that the Levites could live and teach that particular tribe.

Knowing that the fully developed, passionate personality of Jeremiah had a complex and intricate background, we prepare to examine it. But we are brought up short. We are told next to nothing: three bare, unadorned background items – his father’s name, Hilkiah; his father’s vocation, priest; his place of birth, Anathoth. We want to know more.11

Something not mentioned in the book is how Yirmeyahu died. After the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC, Jews who were fleeing the Babylonians took Jeremiah forcefully to Egypt. There is an old Jewish tradition that says that after the Babylonians conquered Egypt, Nebuchadnezzar took Jeremiah back to Babylon where he eventually died. There is also a Christian tradition that says that Jews in Egypt stoned him. But in 1:19 ADONAI promised that He would protect Yirmeyahu, so that tradition cannot be accurate. Most likely the priest from Anathoth died of old age in Egypt.

The word of ADONAI came to him in the thirteenth year of the reign of Josiah (627 BC) son of Amon king of Judah (1:2). The word (singular) is the normal format for the prophetic setting. Yirmeyahu began his ministry during the reign of good king Josiah. He was a young man, probably between 25 to 30 years old. That means he was born during the reign of one of the most evil kings in the history of Judah. The wicked Manasseh fathered Josiah. It was because of Manasseh’s reign that Yirmeyahu was called to be a prophet to a doomed nation. ADONAI had already decreed the destruction of Tziyon and Josiah’s godly reign merely gave the nation a temporary reprieve, but did not cancel its ultimate judgment.

Therefore, Jeremiah ministered through the reign of Jehoiakim, down until the end of Zedekiah’s reign in his eleventh year (586 BC) when the people of Jerusalem went into exile (1:3). He prophesied a little past Zedekiah, Judah’s last king, to at least 585 BC, and perhaps even to 580 BC. For about 45 years he proclaimed the word of ADONAI, but he failed to get any kind of response among the people of Y’hudah. He was even called a false prophet because 40 years passed before his initial prophesies were fulfilled.

He prophesied after Isaiah, Hosea and Micah. They had already come and gone when Jeremiah was called to ministry. There were, however, other prophets who were his contemporaries. During the early days of his ministry Naham, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, were prophets and Huldah was a prophetess (Second Kings 22:14-20; Second Chronicles 34:22-28). In the latter days of his ministry he was a contemporary of Ezeki’el and Dani’el.

The phrase when the people of Jerusalem went into exile provides the finishing point of the book. It is an awesome and dreadful formula. It is a clue to the intent of the word of ADONAI and a signal to the nature of the book. The word is on the move toward exile. Nothing more needs to be said. Nothing the kings can do will alter the outcome, and it is as though the die is cast even before Yirmeyahu appears.

Therefore, the book of Jeremiah is an unwelcomed offer. If we enter, we are invited to accompany the painful, genuinely unthinkable process whereby the Holy City is denied its special character and is handed over, by the intent of YHVH, to the ruthlessness of Babylon. Kings, of course, never believe history works that way. Kings imagine that their royal decisions shape history. But Yirmeyahu asserts otherwise. God steers the historical process toward exile. That is where disobedient Judah finally finds herself. No escape is available. In fact, escape is not even hoped for because that would be a hope counter to the sovereign will of the LORD. The ending is now willed through His word. And when it is spoken, the ending will not go away. We only wait and watch for the ending to materialize. Therefore, the book of Jeremiah is a witness to that long and torturous watch.12

 

2021-01-01T13:22:53+00:000 Comments

Ag – The Lack of Chronological Arrangement

The Lack of Chronological Arrangement

Unlike Ezeki’el, whose prophecies are arranged in chronological order, Jeremiah has no chronological progression. In fact, many of Yirmeyahu’s prophecies that are placed together are actually years apart. He compiled his prophecies in stages. For example, many of Jeremiah’s prophecies against the Gentile nations were written early in his ministry (25:1, 13-14). Yet the content of these prophecies is recorded near the end of the book (46:1 to 49:33). One must look for some other way to arrange the book so the reader is not jumping around trying to make sense of it all. Accordingly, I have taken a historical approach to the organization of the book:

 

Josiah Ruled For 31 Years from 640 to 609 BC

Jehoahaz Ruled For 3 Months in 609 BC

Jehoiakim Ruled For 11 Years from 609 to 598 BC

Jehoiachin Ruled For 3 Months in 598 BC

Zedekiah Ruled For 11 Years from 597 to 586 BC

Gedaliah Ruled For 3 Months in 586 BC

ADONAI was in control the whole way!

2021-01-01T13:13:22+00:000 Comments

Ae – The Problem of Holy War in the TaNaKh

The Problem of Holy War in the TaNaKh

You must destroy all the peoples ADONAI your God gives over to you. Do not look on them with pity and do not serve their gods, for that will be a snare to you (Deuteronomy 7:16).

These harsh words are shocking in the context of the TaNaKh. They are part of an address delivered by Moses to the Israelites, assembled on the plains of Mo’ab. Moses, speaking on behalf of ADONAI, was preparing His people for the conquest and conflict, which happen immediately. God is a tender warrior (see the commentary on Genesis, to see link click EcWhen Abram Heard Lot Had Been Taken Captive, He Went in Pursuit as far as Dan). The pre-incarnate Yeshua ha-Meshiach is the commander of ADONAI’s army (Joshua 5:15a), there is a Book of the Wars of the LORD (Numbers 21:14a), and He commanded His chosen people to engage in a “holywar (First Samuel 17:45). Holy War differed from other kinds of war in that Ha’Shem Himself led the army. The result was to be total annihilation of all living things and the devoting of all material properties to YHVH, as seen below in the cherem judgment.

This call to war seen in Deuteronomy 7:16 is complemented by commandments in Deuteronomy 20 that are again presented as part of Moshe’s address at the base of Mount Sinai. In Deuteronomy 20:10-18, a two-part military policy of conquest is presented. First, when the Israelites came to cities lying outside the Promised Land, they were to offer terms of a peace treaty. If their offer was rejected, they were to lay siege the city and kill all the men, but the women and children could be spared and taken as the spoils of war. But the second part of the policy applied to cities lying within the territory of the Promised Land. They were to be besieged, and after they had fallen, all living creatures, men, women, children, and animals were to be killed.

It is helpful to compare these ancient commandments given to the Israelites with the theory of Carl von Clausewitz, a Prussian soldier and student of war (1780-1831 AD). Von Clausewitz defined war as “an act of violence intended to compel our opponent to fulfill our will.7 As a part of his analysis of war he made an important and necessary distinction between the theoretical or abstract conception of war, on the one hand, and real wars on the other hand. From a theoretical perspective, war must end in victory for the aggressor, for otherwise it would be pointless to start a war in the first place. If complete victory was to be obtained, then no effort could be spared; for von Clausewitz, “to introduce into the philosophy of war itself a principle of moderation would be absurd.”8 Thus, the reality of war was quite different from the abstract notion of war.

Von Clausewitz argued that from a military perspective there were three principle objectives of war. First, the military power of the enemy must be destroyed, so that the enemy could no longer continue a war. Second, the enemy’s country must be conquered, for from that country a new military force could arise. And third, war could only end when the enemy’s will to fight had been crushed.

Now let’s look at the commandments of war in Deuteronomy in the light of the theory of von Clausewitz. Clearly Deuteronomy 20 describes wars of conquest, by which the Israelites imposed their (and God’s) will on Gentile nations. It is also obvious that those commandments dealing with their enemies did not introduce the principle of moderation, but were thoroughly pragmatic in a military sense. Although the cities outside of the Promised Land were to be treated less harshly than those within it, that distinction was merely a part of the overall military policy. They would eventually become neighbors of the new state of Isra’el and would receive a warning concerning Isra’el’s military capability, but they were not the prime military targets. Those cities within the Promised Land, however, were an entirely different story. However, in the cities of the nations ADONAI your God is giving you as an inheritance do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them – the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites – as the LORD your God has commanded you. Otherwise, they will teach you to follow all the detestable things they do in worshiping their gods, and you will sin against ADONAI your God (Deuteronomy 20:16-18). Here all three of von Clausewitz’s military objectives would be achieved in three verses. The military power of the Israelites enemies would be destroyed, the countries could be conquered so that no new military threat could emerge, and the will of the enemy would be mortally subdued.9

This command was, however, essentially theoretical, and as von Clausewitz pointed out, there could be a difference between the theory of war and the reality and practice of war. True to form, the Israelites did not obey Deuteronomy 20:16-18 in every instance. But when they refused to obey the commands of ADONAI they always suffered. When King Sha’ul was unwilling to completely destroy the Amalekites (see the commentary on Esther AqHaman the Agagite: The Enemy of the Jews), the Israelites would eventually swallow the poison pill of idolatry. It was left up to Esther and Mordecai to finish the job (see the commentary on Esther BmSo the Jews Struck Down All Their Enemies with the Sword, Killing and Destroying Them). But the problem remains – wars were carried at the command of God, in the name of God, and with the help of God. Can there be a holy war?

First, we must understand that our total depravity is real and insidious. Very early in the Bible we read: The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually (Genesis 6:5). Paul describes the Gentiles as darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart; they have become callous and have given themselves up to licentiousness, greedy to practice every kind of uncleanness (Ephesians 4:18-19). His description of sinners in Romans 1:18-32 and Titus 1:5, as well as of the men of the last days in Second Timothy 3:2-5, focus on their corruption and desperate wickedness. Those who do not surrender their lives to the Lord Jesus Christ are doomed. For anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God (James 4:4). All who are not adopted into the LORD’s family (see the commentary on The Life of Christ BwWhat God Does For Us at the Moment of Faith) will ultimately be set apart for destruction (see the commentary on Revelation FoThe Great White Throne Judgment).

Thus, total depravity does not mean that the unregenerate person is totally insensitive in matters of conscience, or of right and wrong. For Paul’s statement in Romans 2:15 says that the Gentiles have the Torah written on their hearts, so that their conscience also bears witness and their thoughts accusing them. Further, total depravity does not mean that the sinful man is as sinful as he can possibly be. There are unregenerate people who are genuinely unselfish, who show kindness, generosity and love to others, who are good, devoted spouses and parents. But any or all of those actions do not save a person from God’s wrath. Salvation is like a test with a thousand questions and only one that counts. Do you admit that you are sinner, have you asked Yeshua for forgiveness and accepted Him as your Lord and Savior? Finally, total depravity does note that the sinner engages in every possible form of sin.

What then do we mean by the idea of total depravity? First, sin is a matter of the entire person. The existence of sin is not merely one aspect of the person, such as the body or reason. Further, it means that even the lost person’s unselfishness always contains an element of improper motive. The good acts are not done entirely or even primarily out of perfect love for ADONAI. The Pharisees who so often debated with Jesus did many good things (Matthew 23:23), but they had no real love for God. So He said to them: You search the Scriptures (which was of course good), because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness to Me; yet you refuse to come to Me that you may have life. I do not receive glory from men. But I know that you do not have the love of God within you (John 5:39-42). A genteel layer of charm and graciousness sometimes covers sinfulness. The lost can be so very pleasant, thoughtful, helpful, and generous. At times it’s hard to think of them as being completely sinful and in need of salvation. We need to remember that total depravity is not defined in terms of what we may regard as unpleasant. It is, rather, failing to love, honor, and serve God. So even the likeable and kindly person is in need of the Good News as much as any obnoxious, crude and thoughtless person. Finally, total depravity means that the lost are completely unable to free themselves from their sinful condition. Rabbi Sha’ul writes: And [Yeshua] made you alive when you were dead through the transgressions and sins in which you used to live . . . But because of His great love for us, ADONAI, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith – and that not from yourselves, it is the gift of God – not by works, so that no one can boast (Eph 2:1, 4 8-9).10 Consequently, when we examine the problem of holy war in the TaNaKh, we need to keep the doctrine of total depravity in mind. Without willing obedience to YHVH, those cute little Canaanites would grow up to be idol-worshiping Canaanites.

Lastly, there is a concept in the TaNaKh called the cherem judgment of ADONAI. Cherem means to be devoted to destruction. When conquering the Land after forty years of wilderness wanderings the LORD declared the city of Jericho and all that is in it are to be devoted to destruction. Only Rahab the prostitute and all who are with her in her house shall be spared, because she hid the spies [that were] sent in. But keep away from the devoted things, so that you will not bring about your own destruction by taking any of them. Then they devoted the city to ADONAI and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it – men, women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys. Then they burned the whole city and everything in it (Joshua 6:17-18, 21 and 24a).

But Achan son of Carmi, son of Zimri, the son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah took some of the devoted things. So by using the Urim and Thummim (see my commentary on Exodus GbThe Urim and Thummim: The Means of Making Decisions), Joshua had Israel come forward by tribes, then clans, then the Zerahites and Zimri was taken. Then Joshua said to Achan, “My son, give glory to ADONAI, the God of Isra’el, and give Him the praise. Tell Me what you have done; do not hide it from me.” Achan replied, “It is true! I have sinned against the LORD, the God of Isra’el. When I saw in the plunder a beautiful robe from Babylon, two hundred shekels of silver and a wedge of gold weighing fifty shekels, I coveted them and took them. They are hidden in the ground inside my tent, with the silver underneath (Joshua 7:1, 16-21).

So Joshua sent messengers, and they ran to the tent, and there it was, hidden in his tent, with the silver underneath. They took the things from the tent, brought them to Joshua and all the Israelites and spread them out before the LORD (Josh 7:22-23).

So Joshua, together with all Isra’el, took Achan son of Zerah, the silver, the robe, the gold wedge, his sons and daughters (and presumably his wife), donkeys and sheep his tent and all that he had, to the Valley of Achor, or the Valley of Trouble. Joshua said: Why have you brought this trouble on us? ADONAI will bring trouble on you today. Then all Israel stoned him, and after that they stoned the rest, they burned them (Joshua 7:24-25).

When Moses spoke to the Israelites before leaving on their journey to the Promised Land saying that they were to completely destroy the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites do not leave anything alive, those pagan nations were being devoted to destruction by a Holy God; therefore, it became a holy war.

2023-01-06T13:12:18+00:002 Comments

Ad – The Owl as a Symbol of Judgment

The Owl as a Symbol of Judgment

In every single instance (without exception) the owl is a symbol of judgment in the Bible:

The following creatures of the air are to be detestable for you – they are not to be eaten, they are a detestable thing: the eagle, the vulture, the osprey, the screech-owl, the seagull, the various kinds of hawks, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl, the horned owl, the pelican, the barn owl, the stork, the various kinds of herons, the hoopoe and the bat (Leviticus 11:13-18 CJB).

You may eat any clean bird; but these you are not to eat: eagles, vultures, ospreys, kites, any kind of buzzard, any kind of raven, ostriches, screech-owls, seagulls, any kind of hawk, little owls, great owls, horned owls, pelicans, barn owls, cormorants, storks, any kind of heron, hoopoes or bats (Deuteronomy 14:15-17 CJB).

When I hoped for good, evil came; when I looked for light, then came darkness. The churning inside me never stops; days of suffering confront me. I go about blackened, but not by the sun; I stand up in the assembly and cry for help. I have become a brother of jackals, a companion of owls. My skin grows black and peels; my body burns with fever. My lyre is tuned to morning, and my pipe to the sound of wailing (Job 30:26-31).

ADONAI, hear my prayer! Let my cry for help reach You! Don’t hide Your face from me when I am in such distress! Turn Your ear toward me; when I call, be quick to reply! For my days are vanishing like smoke, my bones are burning like a furnace. I am stricken and withered like grass; I forget to eat my food. Because of my loud groaning, I am just skin and bones. I am like a great owl in the desert, I’ve become like an owl in the ruins (Psalm 102:1-6 CJB).

Babylon, the jewel of kingdoms, the pride and glory of the Babylonians, will be overthrown by God like Sodom and Gomorrah. She will never be inhabited or lived in through all generations; there no nomads will pitch their tents, there no shepherds will rest their flocks. But desert creatures will lie there, jackals will fill their houses; there the owls will dwell, and there the wild goats will leap about. Hyenas will inhabit their strongholds, jackals her luxurious palace. Her time is at hand, and her days will not be prolonged (Isaiah 13:19-22).

I will rise up against them, declares the LORD almighty. I will wipe out Babylon’s name and survivors, her offspring and descendants says ADONAI. I will turn her into a place for owls and into swampland; I will sweep her with the broom of destruction declares the LORD almighty. (Isaiah 14:22-23).

For ADONAI has a day of vengeance, a year of retribution, to uphold Zion’s cause. Edom’s streams will be changed to tar, its dust to sulfur, its land burning tar that will not be quenched night or day; its smoke will rise forever. In all generations it will lie waste; no one will pass through it ever again. Horned owl and hawk will possess it, screech owl and raven will live there; he will stretch over it the measuring line of confusion and the plumbline of empty void. Of its nobles, none will be called to be king, and all its princes will be nothing. Thorns will overgrow its palaces, nettles and thistles its fortresses; it will become a lair for jackals, and enclosure for ostriches. Wildcats and hyenas will meet there; and billy goats call to each other; Lilit [the night monster] will lurk there and find herself a place to rest. There the hoot owl will nest, lay her eggs, hatch and gather her young in its shade (Isaiah 34:8-15 CJB).

A sword against the Babylonians declares ADONAI – a drought on her waters! They will dry up. For it is a land of idols, idols that will go mad with terror. So desert creatures and hyenas will live there, and there the owl will dwell. It will never again be inhabited or lived in from generation to generation (Jeremiah 50:39).

After describing God’s judgment against Samaria and Jerusalem, Micah said: Because of this I will weep and wail; I will go about barefoot and naked. I will howl like a jackal and moan like an owl. For Samaria’s plague is incurable; it has spread to Judah. It has reached the very gate of my people, even to Jerusalem itself (Micah 1:8).

ADONAI will stretch out His hand against the north and destroy Assyria, leaving Nineveh utterly desolate and dry as the desert. Flocks and herds will lie down there, creatures of every kind. The desert owl and the screech owl will roost on her columns. Their hooting will echo through the windows, rubble will fill their doorways, the beams of cedar will be exposed. This is the city of revelry that lived in safety. She said to herself, “I am the one! And there is none beside me.” What a ruin she has become, a lair for wild beasts! All who pass by her scoff and shake their fists (Zeph 2:13-15).

Yirmeyahu would see the tragic results of Judah’s judgment first hand. The book of Lamentations gives us a glimpse of his devastation. He is called “the weeping prophet” for good reason. Secular historians would record the near historical judgment of Babylon. But the far eschatological judgment of MYSTERY BABYLON (see the commentary on Revelation, to see link click ErBabylon Will Never Be Found Again) can be found in Jeremiah itself (51:39-43 and 61-64). And there we find the owl.

2021-04-08T10:47:18+00:000 Comments

Ac – The Book of Jeremiah From a Messianic Jewish Perspective

The Book of Jeremiah From a Messianic Jewish Perspective

To Cesar, a good friend and faithful servant to the Word of God. The glue behind the scenes.

The exodus and the exile of the southern kingdom of Judah are, in one respect, the twin poles around which the TaNaKh revolves. The exodus and the exile are frequent themes in the prophetic writings. In the exodus the people were freed from slavery; in the exile they became enslaved once again. There is something symbolic about the fact that one of the last acts of the people of Judah in Tziyon was to re-enslave the slaves that they had freed just prior to the destruction of their City (34:11). Jeremiah (Hebrew: Yirmeyahu) was the primary prophet of Judah during the dark days leading to her destruction. Though the light of other prophets, such as Habakkuk and Zephaniah, flickered in Judah at the time, Jeremiah was the blazing torch that, along with Ezekiel in Babylon, exposed the darkness of Judah’s sin with the piercing brightness of God’s Word. He was a weeping prophet to a wayward people.To see a short video on Jeremiah click here.

The Use of the New International Version

Because I am writing this commentary on Jeremiah from a Jewish perspective, I will be using the New International Version unless otherwise indicated. There will be times when I substitute Hebrew for English names using the Complete Jewish Bible by David Stern. But generally I will be using the NIV translation for the Jewish perspective.

The use of ADONAI

Long before Yeshua’s day, the word ADONAI had, out of respect, been substituted in speaking and in reading aloud for God’s personal name, the four Hebrew letters yud-heh-vav-heh, variously written in English as YHVH. The Talmud (Pesachim 50a) made it a requirement not to pronounce Tetragrammaton, meaning the four-letter name of God, and this remains the rule in most modern Jewish settings. In deference to this tradition, which is unnecessary but harmless, I will usually be using ADONAI where YHVH is meant.2 In ancient times when the scribes were translating the Hebrew Scriptures, they revered the name of YHVH so much that they would use a quill to make one stroke of the name and then throw it away. Then they would make another stroke and throw that quill away until the name was completed. His name became so sacred to them that they started to substitute the phrase the Name, instead of writing or pronouncing His Name.

Over centuries of doing this, the actual letters and pronunciation of His Name have been lost. Today, the name of G-d is treated with honor and respect. In the Jewish tradition, in order to show respect, the name of the L-rd or G-d is written without the vowel. The idea is that if a document with His Name on it is destroyed or deleted, His Name will be spared because it was not written out fully. As a result, today the closest we can come to the original is YHVH, with no vowels. The pronunciation has been totally lost. Therefore, the names Yahweh or Jehovah are only guesses of what the original name actually sounded like. Both ADONAI and Ha’Shem are substitute names for YHVH. ADONAI is more of an affectionate name like daddy, while Ha’Shem is a more formal name like sir. Therefore, God does not have many names, He has only one name – YHVH (Yud Hay Vav Hay). All the other names in the Bible describe His characteristics and His attributes. Hear, O Isra’el! ADONAI our God, ADONAI is One (Deuteronomy 6:4). The Jewish tradition, then, forbids the pronunciation of the Divine Name, and many choose to use ADONAI in its place.

The use of TaNaKh

The Hebrew word TaNaKh is an acronym, based on the letters T (for “Torah”), N (for “Nevi’im,” or the Prophets), and K (for “Ketuv’im,” or the Sacred Writings). It is the collection of the teachings of God to human beings in document form. The term “Old Covenant” implies that it is no longer valid, or at the very least outdated. Something old, to be either ignored or discarded. But Jesus Himself said: Don’t think I have come to abolish the Torah and the Prophets, I have not come to abolish but to complete (Matthew 5:17 CJB). I will be using the Hebrew acronym TaNaKh instead of the phrase, the Old Testament throughout this devotional commentary.

The Use of the Terms Judah and Isra’el

Jeremiah does not use these terms consistently because by this time the northern kingdom of Isra’el had gone into captivity in 722 BC. Sometimes he uses the terms interchangeably and sometimes he uses them distinctly. There is no pattern.

Jeremiah the Man

We receive a greater glimpse into the life of Jeremiah than we do any other prophet. The book contains quite a bit of biographical material. This is unusual for the writing prophets. Only Jonah contains more biographical material. God told him he was not to marry, and his obedience was amazing because if anyone ever needed a wife it was Yirmeyahu. He was very introspective and a lonely man. He could have profited by the companionship of a wife. But it wasn’t his choice. Unlike some of the other prophets, he tells us how he feels and his internal spiritual struggles. Yirmeyahu was a very emotional man, at least when he was writing. His writing style is flexible, very lyrical. It is a very strong and powerful style, but at the same time there is a certain delicacy about it. Jeremiah is very bold in terms of style and content. The book as a whole has a certain majestic beauty about it. Jeremiah lived in a period of storm and stress. He is the most pathetic prophet in the Bible. He was a prophet of doom against himself. Yirmeyahu knew that there was no chance that the kingdom of Judah was going to repent. And yet, he had to keep prophesying. There was nothing he could do to avoid the catastrophe he knew was coming. Amid the brightest stars of the TaNaKh there is not a name that shines brighter than that of Yirmeyahu.

The Authorship and Date

The author of the book is Jeremiah son of Hilkiah (1:1). His ministry extended from the thirteen years of the reign of Josiah (1:2) until the Judeans captured him and took him to Egypt. As a result, he prophesied from 627 BC to probably at least 582 BC.

Jeremiah in the Scriptures

Jeremiah occurs in Second Chronicles 36:21, Matthew 2:17 (quotes from Jeremiah 31:15), Matthew 16:14 (a man of sorrows), and Matthew 27:9 (potters field). There are 41 direct quotations or references in the New Testament, 26 of them in Revelation.

Key word: shuwb

The key word in Jeremiah is shuwb, meaning to repent (from evil), to return, or to turn back (to something or someone good). This is a significant Hebrew verb and embodies the essence of Yirmeyahu’s message. This verb occurs 1,059 times in the TaNaKh and some 48 times in Jeremiah alone. No other book has this concentration of that verb. I will be inserting the word (shuwb) in the text when it is used. Sometimes there will be a word like faithless or apostasy where the Hebrew word is actually mshuwabh, a feminine noun that actually comes from shuwb, when it is used I will insert (from shuwb).

The Theology of Jeremiah

There are a number of theological issues that the priest from Anathoth deals with: (1) the word of ADONAI is indestructible. There are two ways that people will try to destroy it: by changing the wording or by changing the meaning to fit what they already believe (Second Timothy 4:3); (2) God is sovereign; (3) the LORD is both omniscient (all knowing) and omnipresent (present everywhere at the same time). He is well aware of Judah’s sins, both public and private; (4) Elohim demands obedience. No obedience, no blessing – only judgment; (5) messianic prophecies, the God-Man concept; (6) the sinfulness of mankind; (7) that Judah and Isra’el will be punished because of specific disobedience to the Torah; (8) Yirmeyahu announces the coming of the New Covenant (31-31-34) that will displace the Mosaic Covenant, which will lead to Isra’el’s final restoration; (9) eschatology – Jeremiah does not mention the Second Coming as such, but he does mention the restoration and reestablishment of the throne of David, the messianic Kingdom and the Great Tribulation.

The Use of Different Terms for the People of God

Yisra’el is but one of several terms used to signify the people of God. It is used several times (31:1-2, 4, 10, 21, 23, 27, 31, 36-37) as are the terms virgin (31:4,21), Judah (31:23, 27, 31), Jacob (31:7-11), Ephraim (31:6, 18, 20) and Rachel (31:15). Zion (31:6, 12 and Chapters 38-40) and even Samaria (31:5) are also employed to refer to the people in their various political and geographical forms.3 There is no pattern.

The Debt of Jeremiah to Hosea

A succession of commentators over the years has recognized the close relationship between Jeremiah and Hosea. The resemblance between the two prophets appears not only in the use of language and figures but extends to fundamental ideas on ADONAI and His relationship with Isra’el. We may speculate how this came about. Hosea was a prophet of the northern kingdom of Isra’el. Anathoth, the birthplace of Yirmeyahu, lay north of Tziyon and not very far from the southern border of Isra’el. Moreover, Jeremiah’s family was probably descended from Eli, the priest of Shiloh. So there were both family and geographical links to the north, and Hosea, a shining example of the North Israelite piety, may well have played a significant role in his early development and training. Either Jeremiah’s father or some godly teachers conveyed to Yirmeyahu the great traditions of Israel’s faith and her unique relationship to YHVH in the covenant, her election, and the profound obligation laid on her as a result of this. That tradition shines through the prophets’ preaching.

One of Hosea’s great words was hesed, meaning loyalty or faithfulness. It was the LORD’s complaint against Yisra’el that there was no faithfulness (hesed) in the land (Hosea 4:1). He desired steadfast love (hesed) more than sacrifice (Hosea 6:6), but sadly, Israel’s love (hesed) was like the morning mist, like the early dew that disappears (Hosea 6:4). She needed to sow righteousness and reap the fruit of unfailing love (Hosea 10:12) and maintain love and justice (Hosea 12:6). In the far eschatological future Isra’el would be His bride again in faithfulness (hesed) (Hosea 2:21). Yirmeyahu had spoken of the happy days when Isra’el first followed ADONAI into the wilderness, through a land not sown, recalling the devotion (hesed) of her youth, and her love for Him as a bride (Jer 2:2).

Jeremiah used the metaphor of a son for Isra’el. It was in the mind of God to treat Isra’el as a son and having redeemed him from Egypt to give him a pleasant land and a beautiful heritage. This figure has a parallel in Hosea 11:1. When Isra’el was a child (na’ar) YHVH loved him, called him from Egypt, and nurtured him despite his rebellious ways. Jeremiah’s development of the theme is essentially the same. The LORD had hoped that Isra’el would call Him, “My Father,” but as a faithless wife deserts her husband so Isra’el proved faithless. Yirmeyahu combined the metaphors of a son and a wife in Jer 3:19-20.

Another idea that Yirmeyahu held in common with Hosea was the knowledge of God (Hebrew: da’at Elohim) in the Land (Hosea 4:1), and it was ADONAI’s people were destroyed because of their lack of knowledge (Hosea 4:6). Jeremiah likewise complained on God’s behalf: Those who deal with the Torah did not know (Hebrew: yada) Me (Jeremiah 2:8 CJB). Again: My people are foolish – they do not know Me, they are stupid children without understanding (Jeremiah 4:22 CJB). To know YHVH was to be committed to Him with a profound personal commitment that totally touched the person’s life. In the days of the New Covenant all will know Me from the least to the greatest (Jeremiah 31:34). Hosea likewise envisioned a day in the far eschatological future when the LORD would be betrothed to His people, returning to the days’ of courtship . . . and in faithfulness they would know Him (Hosea 2:20).

The picture of Ha’Shem’s lawsuit (Hebrew verb: rub) against Isra’el appears in Hosea 4:1-3. The covenant lawsuit is a well-known feature in the TaNaKh. Hosea pictured Isra’el as being called upon to answer ADONAI in the matter of certain failures on her part to show knowledge of God (da’at Elohim). Jeremiah also uses the term (rub) in a slightly different sense. The LORD had a lawsuit (rub) against the nations (Jeremiah 25:31). The priest from Anathoth was under great pressure from his foes (Yirmeyahu 11:20, 20:12, 50:34, 51:36) because the prophet was committed to God’s cause (rub). Even if the word lawsuit was not used it was clear that Yirmeyahu was laying a charge against Isra’el throughout his ministry (Jeremiah 15:10), and issuing a threat of judgment against them in which the land itself would share (Hosea 4:1-3). Hosea specifically spoke of  YHVH’s lawsuit (sub) against the priests (Hosea 4:4-10). Jeremiah also had strong things to say against the priests (Yirmeyahu 2:8 and 26-27, 4:9, 5:31, 13:13, and so on).

Both Hosea and Jeremiah express wonderment that Isra’el could have turned (shuwb) her back on YHVH in the face of all He had done for them. According to Hosea, no sooner had Isra’el reached the Promised Land, the home ADONAI had prepared for His bride, and there discovered that love meant loyalty, than she rebelled (Hosea 2:5-8, 9:10). Not that it surprised Him, but God had to face the disheartening fact that the love of His people would last no longer than the morning mist (Hosea 6:4). Yirmeyahu took up the same question but took it one step further. To him, Isra’el’s disloyalty required an explanation, and all the more so because the Gentiles to the west and to the east were not guilty of changing loyalty to their gods as Isra’el had done. Judah had substituted a helpless idol in the place of her God (Jeremiah 2:10-22). The remarkable thing was that the goyim really weren’t losing anything because their idols were already powerless. But Yisra’el had forsaken the LORD, a spring of running water, for dry cisterns that could not hold water (Yirmeyahu 2:12-13).

Both Yirmeyahu and Hosea idealized the wilderness period as a time when Isra’el’s faith was uncontaminated by the corrupting influence of the Canaanite worship of Ba’al (Jeremiah 2:1-3; Hosea 11:1). But her fall was staggering. Such apostasy devastated the very foundations of family morality (Hosea 4:4). Both prophets emphasized the relationship between the inherent sensuousness of this false worship and the ethical motives of love, trust, and gratitude that a true relationship with God demanded and produced. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served the created thing rather than the Creator (Romans 1:25; Jeremiah 2:5, 11 and 13; Hosea 9:10).

Both Hosea and Jeremiah struck a strong note of repentance. Three passages in Jeremiah, 3:22-25, 14:7-10 and 14:19-22, represent “confession of sin” of the type Yirmeyahu believed the people should make. Isra’el is pictured as confessing to YHVH; that their wickedness testified against them and that ADONAI alone was her hope and savior in a time of trouble; and asking why Ha’Shem had rejected them. They acknowledged their sins and asked Him not to break His covenant with them. Such confessions remind us of Hosea 6:1-3 and 14:2-3 where Isra’el is pictured as saying: Come, let us return to the LORD, confessing that Assyria would not save us, and asking God to take away their iniquity.4

Seven Complaints

More than any other prophet of the TaNaKh Yirmeyahu saw his relationship with ADONAI to be a problem to be grappled with, more than simply an obligation to be taken for granted. There had been other prophets who spoke for God, great ones, in past times – Elijah and Amos, Hosea and Micah and Isaiah. But one finds, in reading through the pages that record their words and deeds, that once they became convinced that the LORD was calling them to speak, they spoke, and that was that; so far as our record goes, no question crossed their minds regarding the nature of their calling.

Jeremiah, however, while he went ahead and spoke, nonetheless hesitated before accepting the task and continued to question and complain about the way YHVH was treating him. The term complaint is maybe not the ideal one since the passages consist of prayers, laments, confessions, disputes and objections. In his capacity and willingness to dispute and doubt, he stands out from most of the people in the pages of the Bible; and this capacity and willingness brings him close to us. For while there are many people in our day who are willing to undertake a life of faith lived under Ha’Shem’s guidance and care, there are few who do not at some point question or complain about His ways . . . or wanted to.5

To see the links, click on the letters below:

  1. AxOh, Adonai ELOHIM, Surely You Have Deceived This People
  2. BjThe Plot Against Jeremiah
  3. BkWhy Does the Way of the Wicked Prosper?
  4. CmWoe to Me, Mother, That You Gave Me Birth
  5. CsHeal Me ADONAI, and I Will Be Healed, Save Me and I Will Be Saved
  6. CxJeremiah’s Response to a Threat Against His Life
  7. DbYou Deceived Me, LORD, and I Have Been Deceived

Ten Symbolic Actions

Jeremiah made a good deal of use of the symbolic action. But there are examples in the TaNaKh of such symbolic actions before and after Yirmeyahu’s day. In the ninth century in the days of King Ahab a prophet Zedekiah ben Chenaanah made horns of iron for himself and declared to Ahab of Yisra’el and Jehoshaphat of Judah: With these [iron horns] you will gore the Arameans until they are destroyed (First Kings 22:11). In Elisha’s day, the prophet told Jehoash king of Isra’el to shoot arrows in the direction of Syria to symbolize Isra’el’s forthcoming victory over the Arameans (Second Kings 13:14-19).

In the eighth century BC, symbolic actions were associated with both Isaiah and Hosea. Thus, Isaiah went stripped and barefoot for three years, as a sign and warning against Egypt and Cush, so the king of Assyria will lead away stripped and barefoot the Egyptian captives and Cushite exiles, young and old, with buttocks bared – to Egypt’s shame (20:3-4). Even the naming of his children with symbolic names was a symbolic act (see the commentary on Isaiah CfThe Sign of Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz).

Hosea’s marriage to Gomer was a symbolic enactment of the relationship of Isra’el to YHVH. Hosea the faithful husband symbolizes Ha’Shem, and Gomer the unfaithful wife symbolizes Yisra’el. The names of Hosea’s children are likewise symbolic of the judgment of ADONAI on Isra’el: Jezreel (God sows) indicated that the LORD would soon demand from the house of Jehu the blood of Jezreel and the massacre of the royal family (Second Kings 9-10); Lo Ruhamah (she who is not pitied) symbolized that God would have no pity on the house of Isra’el; and Lo ‘Ammi (not-My-people) symbolized YHVH’s rejection of His people.

Ezekiel also employed symbolic actions on several occasions. He sketched the siege of Jerusalem on a large mud brick (Ezekiel 4:1-2). He lay on his side like one paralyzed for a long period of time to symbolize the guilt of Judah and her punishment. The lack of provisions in Tziyon during the siege of Nebuchadnezzar was symbolized by Ezekiel taking only small quantities of bread and water (Ezekiel 4:9-11). And the life in exile was symbolized by his eating unclean food (Ezekiel 4:12-17). Ezekiel shaved off his hair and beard, then burned, smote and scattered it to the winds to symbolize the fate of the inhabitants of the City of David (Ezekiel 5:1-17). Ezekiel used other symbolic actions to symbolize the advance of the Babylonian army (Ezekiel 12:1-20), the distress of the people of the Holy City during the Babylonian siege (Ezekiel 21:19-23), the paralyzing grief of the Jews in Babylonia at the fall of Yerushalayim (Ezekiel 24:1-14), the second deportation of the people of Judah (Ezekiel 24:15-27), and the reunion of the two kingdoms into one in the far eschatological future (Ezekiel 37:15-28).6

When we come to Jeremiah specifically and find that he too performed ten symbolic actions, what might be called parables in action. It is clear that he was in a long tradition of making good use of these symbolic actions that carried on long after his death. As in the case with all parables it is wrong to search for meaning in every detail. This only leads the reader to allegorize the text which is a hindrance to sound biblical interpretation.

To see the links, click on the letters below:

  1. CoYou Must Not Marry and Have Sons and Daughters in This Place
  2. CwAt the Potter’s House
  3. CzJudah is Like a Broken Jar
  4. DtThe Rechabites
  5. DxA Linen Loincloth
  6. EqJudah to Serve Nebuchadnezzar
  7. EtThe False Prophet Hananiah
  8. FiIn This Same Way Babylon Will Sink, Never to Rise Again
  9. FsJeremiah Buys a Field
  10. GiNebuchadnezzar Will Burn Down the Temples of the gods of Egypt
2024-07-27T10:39:30+00:001 Comment

Ab – The Outline of Jeremiah

The Outline of Jeremiah

The basis for this commentary is taken from the Jeremiah Tape Series
by Arnold Fruchtenbaum and Ariel Ministries in San Antonio, Texas.

The Book of Jeremiah from a Jewish Perspective (Ac)

The Owl as a Symbol of Judgment (Ad)

The Problem of Holy War in the TaNaKh (Ae)

Covenants of the TaNaKh (Af)

The Lack of Chronological Arrangement (Ag)

The Introduction to Jeremiah (Ah) 1:1-3

I.  Josiah Ruled For 31 Years from 640 to 609 BC (Ai)

B. The Call of Jeremiah (Aj) 1:4-19

B. Judah’s Guilt and Punishment (Ak) 2:1 to 6:30

1. The Faithlessness of Judah (Al) 2:1 to 3:5

a. I Remember the Devotion of Your Youth (Am) 2:1-13

b. Isra’el Forsakes God (An) 2:14-19

c. I Planted You Like a Choice Vine (Ao) 2:20-28

d. Your Sword Has Devoured Your Prophets Like a Lion (Ap) 2:29-37

e. You Have Lived as a Prostitute With Many Lovers (Aq) 3:1-5

2. The Choice of Repentance or Judgment (Ar) 3:6 to 6:30

a. Return to Me (As) 3:6 to 4:2

(1) Unfaithful Isra’el (At) 3:6-18

(2) Return to Me Faithless People (Au) 3:19 to 4:4

b. The Judgments Upon Judah (Av) 4:5 to 6:30

(1) The Call to Judah to Avoid the Wrath of God (Aw) 4:5-31

(a) Jeremiah’s First Complaint (Ax) 4:5-18

(b) Disaster Follows Disaster (Ay) 4:19-31

(2) The Corruption of Jerusalem (Az) 5:1-31

(a) No One Is Upright (Ba) 5:1-9

(b) Judah’s Invasion from a Distant Nation (Bb) 5:10-19

(c) The Prophets Prophesy Lies (Bc) 5:20-31

(3) Jerusalem Under Siege (Bd) 6:1-30

(a) Flee for Safety People of Benjamin (Be) 6:1-15

(b) I am Bringing Disaster on This People (Bf) 6:16-30

C. The Broken Covenant and the Resulting Judgment (Bg) 11:1 to 12:17

1. The Broken Covenant (Bh) 11:1-17

2. Judah’s Resulting Judgment (Bi) 11:18 to 12:17

a. Jeremiah’s Second Complaint (Bj) 11:18-23

b. Jeremiah’s Third Complaint (Bk) 12:1-4

c. How Can You Run With the Horses? (Bl) 12:5-17

II. Jehoahaz Ruled For 3 Months in 609 BC (Bm)

A. No Balm in Gilead (Bn) 8:4 to 10:25

1. The Ruin of People Who Turn Away (Bo) 8:4 to 9:22

a. I Will Take Away Their Harvest (Bp) 8:4-17

b. Since My People are Crushed, I am Crushed (Bq) 8:18 to 9:9

c. Jerusalem’s Fall and Exile Prophesied (Br) 9:10-22

2. The Contrast Between ADONAI and False gods (Bs) 9:23 to 10:25

a. Let Not the Wise Boast of Their Wisdom (Bt) 9:23-26

b. These gods Will Perish, But the LORD is the One True God (Bu) 10:1-16

c. I Will Hurl Out Those Who Live in This Land (Bv) 10:17-25

B. The Message to the Evil Kings of Judah (Bw) 22:1-19

1. Concerning the House of David (Bx) 22:1-9

2. Concerning Shallum, Otherwise Known as King Jehoahaz (By) 22:10-12

3. Concerning Eliakim, Otherwise Known as King Jehoiakim (Bz) 22:13-19

III. Jehoiakim Ruled For 11 Years from 609/608 to 598 BC (Ca)

A. Jeremiah’s Temple Sermon (Cb) 7:1 to 8:3

1. False Religion is Worthless (Cc) 7:1-15

2. They Make Cakes for the Queen of Heaven (Cd) 7:16-20

3. Obey Me, and I Will Be Your God (Ce) 7:21-28

4. They Will Bury the Dead in Topheth (Cf) 7:29 to 8:3

B. Jeremiah Threatened With Death (Cg) 26:1-24

C. God’s Determination to Punish Judah (Ch) 14:1 to 17:27

1. Sword, Famine, and Drought (Ci) 14:1 to 15:21

a. Judah’s Terrible Drought (Cj) 14:1-6

b. Jerusalem’s Judgment Inescapable (Ck) 14:7 to 15:4

c. You Have Rejected Me, I am Tired of Relenting (Cl) 15:5-9

d. Jeremiah’s Fourth Complaint (Cm) 15:10-21

2. Jeremiah’s First Symbolic Action (Cn) 16:1-21

a. You Must Not Marry and Have Sons and Daughters (Co) 16:1-13

b. Judgment Before Final Restoration to the Land (Cp) 16:14-21

3. Judah’s Sin and the LORD’s Sovereignty (Cq) 17:1-27

a. Blessed is the One Who Trusts in the LORD (Cr) 17:1-11

b. Jeremiah’s Fifth Complaint (Cs) 17:12-18

c. The Sabbath and National Survival (Ct) 17:19-27

D. The Potter’s Clay and the Broken Jar (Cu) 18:1 to 20:18

1. The Potter’s Clay (Cv) 18:1-23

a. Jeremiah’s Second Symbolic Action (Cw) 18:1-17

b. Jeremiah’s Sixth Complaint (Cx) 18:18-23

2. The Broken Jar (Cy) 19:1 to 20:18

a. Jeremiah’s Third Symbolic Action (Cz) 19:1-15

b. Jeremiah and Pash’chur (Da) 20:1-6

c. Jeremiah’s Seventh Complaint (Db) 20:7-18

E. Babylonian Dominance Foretold (Dc) 25:1-28

1. Isra’el Will Serve the King of Babylon Seventy Years (Dd) 25:1-14

2. The Cup of God’s Wrath Against the Nations (De) 25:15-38

F. Jehoiakim Burns Jeremiah’s Scroll (Df) 36:1-32 and 45:1-5

G. Prophecies Concerning the Gentile Nations (Dg) 46:1 to 49:33

1. A Message Concerning Egypt (Dh) 46:1-28

2. A Message Concerning the Philistines (Di) 47:1-7

3. A Message Concerning Mo’ab (Dj) 48:1-47

a. The Destruction of Mo’ab (Dk) 48:1-25

b. The Punishment and Restoration of Mo’ab (Dl) 48:26-47

4. A Message Concerning Ammon (Dm) 49:1-6

5. A Message Concerning Edom (Dn) 49:7-22

6. A Message Concerning Damascus (Do) 49:23-27

7. A Message Concerning Kedar and Hazor or the Arab Tribes (Dp) 49:28-33

H. Nebuchadnezzar’s Troubling Dream (Dq) Dani’el 2:1-49

1. Nebuchadnezzar Dreams of an Image (Dr) Dani’el 2:1-23

2. Dani’el Interprets Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream (Ds) Dani’el 2:24-49

I. Jeremiah’s Fourth Symbolic Action (Dt) 35:1-19

IV. Jehoiachin Ruled For 3 Months in 598 BC (Du)

A. The Curse of Jeconiah, Also Known as Jehoiachin or Coniah (Dv) 22:20-30

B. A Linen Loincloth, Wineskins and the Threat of Captivity (Dw) 13:1-27

1. Jeremiah’s Fifth Symbolic Action (Dx) 13:1-11

2. Wineskins and the Threat of Captivity (Dy) 13:12-27

V. Zedekiah Ruled For 11 Years from 598/597 to 586 BC (Dz)

A. True and False Prophets (Ea)

1. The Righteous Branch (Eb) 23:1-8

2. Concerning the False Prophets (Ec) 23:9-40

a. Both Prophet and Priest are Godless (Ed) 23:9-12

b. False Prophets Condemned (Ee) Jeremiah 23:13-22 and Ezeki’el 13:1-23

c. What Has Straw To Do With Wheat? (Ef) 23:23-32

d. The Burden of the LORD (Eg) 23:33-40

B. A Message Concerning Elam (Eh) 49:34-39

C. Two Baskets of Figs (Ei) 24:1-10

D. A Letter to the Exiles (Ej) 29:1-32

E. The Book of Comfort (Ek) 30:1 to 31:40

1. The Restoration of Isra’el (El) 30:1-24

2. O LORD, Save Your People, the Remnant of Isra’el (Em) 31:1-14

3. The LORD Bless You, O Righteous Dwelling, Sacred Mountain (En) 31:15-30

4. I Will Make a New Covenant with the People of Isra’el (Eo) 31:31-34

5. Isra’el Will Never Cease Being a Nation Before Me (Ep) 31:35-40

F. Jeremiah’s Sixth Symbolic Action (Eq) 27:1-22

G. Ezeki’el’s First Vision (Er) Ezeki’el 1:1-28a

H. Ezeki’el’s Call to Be a Prophet (Es) Ezeki’el 1:28b to 3:3

I. Jeremiah’s Seventh Symbolic Action (Et) 28:1-17

J. Idolatry in the Temple (Eu) Ezeki’el 8:1-18

K. Isra’el’s History of Rebellion (Ev) Ezeki’el 20:1-49

1. Rebellious Isra’el Purged (Ew) Ezeki’el 20:1-32

2. Rebellious Isra’el Renewed (Ex) Ezeki’el 20:33-44

3. Prophecy Against the Negev (Ey) Ezeki’el 20:45-49

L. A Message Against Babylon (Ez) 50:1-46 and 51:1-64

1. Babylon Will Be Captured and Will Be Put to Shame (Fa) 50:1-10

2. The Destruction of Babylon and the Restoration of Isra’el (Fb) 50:11-24

3. Babylon’s Enemy and Isra’el’s Redeemer (Fc) 50:25-38

4. The Devastation of Babylon According to Divine Purpose (Fd) 50:39-46

5. Judgment Against Babylon (Fe) 51:1-14

6. The Greatness of the God of Isra’el (Ff) 51:15-26

7. Lift Up a Banner in the Land, Blow the Shofar (Fg) 51:27-44

8. The Fall of Babylon and Assurance to the Exiles (Fh) 51:45-58

9. Jeremiah’s Eighth Symbolic Action (Fi) 51:59-64a

M. God Rejects Zedekiah’s Request (Fj) 21:1-14

N. Jerusalem as a Boiling Pot (Fk) Ezeki’el 24:1-14

O. The Sin and Judgment of the Gentile Nations (Fl) Ezeki’el 25:1-17

P. Jeremiah in Prison (Fm) 37:1-21

Q. The Sin and Judgment of Egypt (Fn) Ezekiel Chapters 29-32

1. I’m Against You, Pharaoh, King of Egypt (Fo) Ezeki’el 29:1-16

2. A Lament Over Egypt (Fp) Ezeki’el 30:1-26

3. Pharaoh as a Felled Cedar of Lebanon (Fq) Ezeki’el 31:1-18

R. The Restoration of Isra’el and Judah Illustrated (Fr) 32:1-44

1. Jeremiah’s Ninth Symbolic Action (Fs) 32:1-15

2. Jeremiah Prays for Wisdom (Ft) 32:16-25

3. I Am the LORD, Is Anything Too Hard For Me? (Fu) 32:26-44

S. The Interpretation of the Symbolic Action (Fv) 33:1-26

1. The Promise of Restoration (Fw) 33:1-13

2. David Will Never Fail to Have a Man Sit On the Throne (Fx) 33:14-26

T. A Warning to Zedekiah (Fy) 34:1-22

U. Jeremiah Thrown into a Cistern (Fz) 38:1-28 and 39:15-18

V. The Fall of Jerusalem (Ga) 39:1-14 and 52:4-27

W. The Destruction of Solomon’s Temple on Tisha B’Av in 586 BC (Gb)

VI. Gedaliah Ruled For 3 Months in 586 BC (Gc)

A. The Image of Gold and the Blazing Furnace (Gd) Dani’el 3:1-30

B. After the Fall of Jerusalem (Ge) 40:1 to 44:30

1. Jeremiah Freed (Gf) 40:1-6

2. Gedaliah Assassinated (Gg) 40:7 to 41:15 and Second Kings 25:22-25

3. The Flight to Egypt (Gh) 41:16 to 42:22

4. Jeremiah’s Tenth Symbolic Action (Gi) 43:1-13

C. Jeremiah’s Final Word to Judeans in Egypt (Gj) 44:1-30 and 51:64b

D. The Valley of Dry Bones (Gk) Ezeki’el 37:1-28

E. The Sin and Judgment of Tyre and Tzidon (Gl) Ezeki’el 26:1 to 28:26

1. A Prophecy Against Tyre (Gm) Ezeki’el 26:1-21

2. A Lament Over the Ruin of Tyre (Gn) Ezeki’el 27:1-36

3. A Prophecy Against the King of Tyre (Go) Ezeki’el 28:1-19

4. A Prophecy Against Tzidon (Gp) Ezeki’el 28:20-26

F. I Am Going to Give Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar (Gq) Ezeki’el 29:17-21

G. A Lament Over Pharaoh (Gr) Ezeki’el 32:1-32

H. God Shows a Vision of the Millennial Temple (Gs) Ezeki’el Chapters 40-48

I. In the 37th Year, Jehoiachin Released from Prison (Gt) 52:28-34

J. Seventy Years of Imperial Babylonian Rule (Gu)

K. Spiritual Lessons Learned from the Exile (Gv)

Glossary (Gw)

End Notes (Gx)

Bibliography (Gy)

 

2021-01-08T12:55:20+00:000 Comments

Aa – Jeremiah, Where Life and the Bible Meet

Jeremiah, Where Life and the Bible Meet . . .

1. Look at the outline (Ab), and the Introduction (Ac) before starting on the commentary itself.

2. The DIG and REFLECT questions are in bold navy blue and will help to give you a deeper understanding of the book and make it more personal to you. Go slowly and give yourself time to answer these questions. They really strike at the heart of the commentary. What are the DIG questions for? To dig into the Scripture “story.” To find out what’s going on, to figure out the main idea, the plot, the argument, the spiritual principle, and so on. What are the REFLECT questions for? To apply the “story” in the Scripture to your own life; to take personal inventory and to decide what you are going to do about it! Many of the DIG and REFLECT questions are taken from the Serendipity Bible.

3. I would strongly suggest that you look up the references that are given in each section. Many times this will greatly enhance the background, and hence, your understanding of the Scriptures that you are reading on a particular day. Take your time, read only as much as you can digest.

There are times when I refer you to either another file in Isaiah, or a file in another book of the Bible, to give you more detail on a particular person, topic, concept or theology. An example might be something like the Great Sanhedrin (see my commentary on The Life of Christ LgThe Great Sanhedrin). If you feel you already know enough about the Great Sanhedrin, you can skip the reference and continue reading. But if it interests you, or if you don’t know what the Sanhedrin is, you can go to that file and read it first before continuing. It’s your choice. 

4. All Scripture is in bold print. The NIV is used unless indicated otherwise. However, sometimes the purpose of the bold print is merely for emphasizing a certain point. When bold maroon is used, it is for special emphasis. The words of Jesus are bolded in red.

5. When bold teal is used, it is quoted from one of the two Jewish commentaries listed in the bibliography. This will give you the moderate Orthodox Jewish interpretation. It is useful for word studies, but its Christology is obviously entirely wrong. Where rabbinical interpretation is cited, I will add, “The rabbis teach. . .” in front of the passage. Although it is not a Christian interpretation, I think it is interesting to see how the rabbis interpret these passages.

6. Read the Scriptures for a particular day first, then skim the DIG or REFLECT questions, read the commentary and reflect on it; answer the DIG or REFLECT questions, then read your Bible again. Hopefully, it will have greater meaning for you the second time you read it. Then live it out.

7. If you come to a Jewish word or phrase you don’t understand, see the glossary at the end of the book (GwGlossary).

8. To download a pdf file, click on the red rectangle on the top of any page.

9. You can download anything you want from this devotional commentary © 2014 but all rights are reserved by Jay D. Mack, M.Div

2024-05-17T18:34:02+00:000 Comments

Ch – End Notes

End Notes

The Book of Esther from a Jewish Perspective

1. Life Change Series: Ruth and Esther, NavPress, the Navigators, Colorado Springs, CO, 1987, pages 64-65.

2. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, pages 699-700.

3. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 45.

The Place of Esther in the Canon of Scripture

4. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, pages 292-294.

Ancient Storytelling and the book of Esther

5. Ezra, Nehemiah and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 286.

6. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 32-33.

The Theology of the book of Esther

7. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 41-43.

Esther Placed in a Position of Prominence

8. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 701.

Chapter 1

9. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 62.

10. Ibid, pages 58-59.

11. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 306.

12. Life Change Series: Ruth and Esther, NavPress, the Navigators, Colorado Springs, CO, 1987, page 76.

13. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 66-67.

14. Ibid, pages 75-76.

15. Ibid, pages 69 and 75.16.

16. Ibid, pages 78-79.

17. The Name of God Concealed in the Book of Esther, by Dr. Ronald Youngblood, Bible Review 3 (Fall 1981): pages 6-7 Letter with response by Carey Moore.

Esther Elevated to Queen

18. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, pages 142-143.

Chapter 2

19. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 94.

20. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 314.

21. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 36.

22. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 704.

23. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 146.

24. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 111.

25. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, pages 148-149.

26. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 112-115.

27. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 144.

28. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 319.

Haman Plots to Destroy the Jews

29. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 325.

30. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 118.

31. Women of the Bible: God’s Word for the Biblically Inept, by Kathy Miller, Starburst Publishers, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1999, page 144.

32. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, pages 70-71.

33. Women of the Bible: God’s Word for the Biblically Inept, by Kathy Miller, Starburst Publishers, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1999, page 144.

34. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 323.

Chapter 3

35, Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 119-120.

36. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 72.

37. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 327.

38. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 121.

39. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 328.

40. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 143.

41. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 328.

42. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 122.43.

43. Ibid, page 122.

44. Life Change Series: Ruth and Esther, NavPress, the Navigators, Colorado Springs, CO, 1987, page 87.

45. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 74.

46. Second Corinthians, by John MacArthur, Moody Publishers, Chicago, Illinois, 2003, page 45.

47. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 122.

48. Women of the Bible: God’s Word for the Biblically Inept, by Kathy Miller, Starburst Publishers, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1999, page 146.

49. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 706.

50. First Peter, by MacArthur, Chicago, Moody Publishers, 2004, pages 280-281.

51. Ibid, pages 280-284.

52. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 332.

Chapter 4

53. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 76.

54. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 131.

55. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 77.

56. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 136-137.

57. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 328.

58. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 78.

59. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 150.

60. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 79.

61. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 133-134.

62. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 150-151.

Chapter 5

63. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 707.

64. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 144.

65. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 85.

66. Ibid, pages 78-79.

67. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 329.

68. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 147.

69. The Name of God Concealed in the Book of Esther, by Dr. Ronald Youngblood, Bible Review 3 (Fall 1981): pages 6-7 Letter with response by Carey Moore.

70. Lost Women of the Bible, by Carolyn James, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2005, page 153.

71. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 87.

72. The Name of God Concealed in the Book of Esther, by Dr. Ronald Youngblood, Bible Review 3 (Fall 1981): pages 6-7 Letter with response by Carey Moore.

73. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 88.

74. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 708.

Chapter 6

75. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 87.

76. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 152.

77. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 90.

78. Ibid, page 91.

Chapter 7

79. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 164.

80. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther: The New Century Commentary, by D. J. Clines, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984, page 311.

81. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 710.

82. The Name of God Concealed in the Book of Esther, by Dr. Ronald Youngblood, Bible Review 3 (Fall 1981): pages 6-7 Letter with response by Carey Moore.

83. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 165.

84. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 4, Frank Gaebelein, General Editor, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1988, page 826.

85. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 350.

86. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 172.

87. Ibid, page 173.

Chapter 8

88. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 176-177.

89. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther: The New Century Commentary, by D. J. Clines, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984, page 314.

90. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 94.

91. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 4, Frank Gaebelein, General Editor, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1988, page 829.

92. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 95.

93. Women of the Bible: God’s Word for the Biblically Inept, by Kathy Miller, Starburst Publishers, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1999, page 155.

94. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther: The New Century Commentary, by D. J. Clines, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984, page 316.

95. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, page 16.

96. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 712.

97. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 99.

98. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 356.

99. The Bible Knowledge Commentary on the Old Testament, by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck, Victor Books, Wheaton, Illinois, 1986, page 712.

100. The Problem of War in the Old Testament, by Peter Craigie, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1978, pages 38-39.

101. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 191.

Chapter 9

102. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 357.

103. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 103.

104. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 208-209.

105. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 105.

106. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 199 and 202.

107. Ibid, page 198.

108. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, page 17.

109. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 283.

110. Answers to Tough Questions, by J. Carl Laney, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1997, page 102.

111. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, page 5.

The Feast of Purim

112. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 213-214.

113. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, page 4.

114. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 214.

115. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther: The New Century Commentary, by D. J. Clines, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984, page 326.

116. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, pages 14-15.

117. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 216.

118. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther: The New Century Commentary, by D. J. Clines, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1984, page 326.

119. Ibid, 326

120. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 365.

121. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 214-216.

122. Siddur for Messianic Jews, by Dr. John Fischer, Menorah Ministries, Palm Harbor, Florida, Page 79.

123. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 366.

124. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, pages 222-223.

125. Esther: Commentary on the Old Testament, Volume III, by Frederick Keil, Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1980, page 378.

126. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 111.

127. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 224.

128. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, pages 10-11.

129. Ibid, pages 11-13.

130. Ibid, pages 13-14.

131. Ibid, page 14.

132. Ibid, page 15.

133. Ibid, pages 15-16.

134. Ibid, page 16.

135. Ibid, page 16.

136. Ibid, page 9.

137. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids, by Millard Erickson, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1985, page 389.

138. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther), by Arnold Fruchtenbaum, MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, San Antonio, Texas, 1980, page 10.

Chapter 10

139. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 369.

140. Esther: Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, by Joyce Baldwin, Inter-Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois, 1984, page 115.

141. Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther, The New American Commentary, by Mervin Breneman, B&H Publishing Group, Nashville, Tennessee, 1993, page 281.

142. Esther, the NIV Application Commentary, by Karen Jobes, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1999, page 224.

 

2024-05-14T17:22:03+00:000 Comments

Ci – Bibliography

Bibliography

 

Baldwin, Joyce. Esther. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 1984.

Breneman, Mervin. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Nashville: B & H Publishing, 1993.

Cohen, Aaron. The Five Megilloth. London: The Soncino Press, 1947.

Clines, David J. The New Century Bible Commentary: Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.

Coleman, Lyman. The Serendipity Bible for Groups, New International Version. Littleton: Serendipity House, 1988.

Craigie, Peter. The Problem of War in the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1978.

Erickson, Millard. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1985.

Fischer, Dr. John. Siddur for Messianic Jews. Palm Harbor, Menorah Ministries, 1988.

Fruchtenbaum, Arnold. Purim: The Feast of Lots (Esther): MBS177 A Messianic Bible Study from Ariel Ministries, 1980.

Gaebelein, Frank, General Editor. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids, Zondervan 1988.

James, Carolyn. Lost Women of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005.

Jobes, Karen. Esther. The New International Version Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999.

Keil and Delitzsch, Esther: Commentary on the Old Testament, Volume III. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1980.

Laney, J. Carl. Answers to Tough Questions. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1997.

MacArthur, John. First Peter. Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2004.

Miller, Kathy. Women of the Bible: God’s Word for the Biblically-Inept. Lancaster: Starburst Publishers, 1999.

Navigators, The. Ruth and Esther: Life Change Series. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1987.

Reid, Daniel and Longman III, Tremper, “When God Declares War,” Christianity Today, 1996.

Stern, David. The Complete Jewish Bible. Clarksville: Jewish New Testament Publications, 1998.

Youngblood, Ronald. The Name of God Concealed in the Book of Esther, Bible Review 3 (fall 1981): 6-7, Letter with response by Carey Moore.

Zuck, Roy. The Bible Knowledge Commentary. Wheaton: Victor Books, 1986.

 

2024-05-14T18:42:57+00:000 Comments

Cf – The Greatness of Mordecai 10: 1-3

The Greatness of Mordecai
10: 1-3

The greatness of Mordecai DIG: For what was Mordecai honored? His character? His behavior? The results? How are those three related? How did Mordecai work for the good of his people and spoke up for the welfare of all the Jews? How are you like that in your life? How would you like to be like that? Give concrete examples?

REFLECT: What is the central point of this book? How is God hidden in its pages? Why do you think He is hidden? How were Mordecai and Esther obedient servants for ADONAI? Is that how you see yourself? Why or why not? Illustrate.

This short chapter is an appendix or postscript to the book, emphasizing the power of King Ahasuerus and the glory that was thereby reflected on Mordecai as his prime minister. During the twentieth year of his reign, in 465 BC, King Ahasuerus was assassinated. Today, this king is mostly remembered for his queen, Esther, and the one who adopted and raised her, Mordecai.

King Ahasuerus imposed tribute throughout the empire, to its distant shores (10:1). The book ends on a note similar to that of its beginning – the greatness, wealth, and splendor of King Ahasuerus. This example of bracketing is common in Hebrew literature. The author emphasized the great extent of his empire to the distant shores of the Mediterranean area. Having the power to demand obedience from his subjects, he imposed, or “forced” tribute on them. Possibly, in keeping with one of the themes of the book, the author wanted to show that the king, who saved the Jews from extinction, later prospered. Although Ahasuerus did not receive the 10,000 talents of silver from Haman (3:9), he was enriched by receiving all this tribute.139

Nevertheless, it is Mordecai who gets the last word. And all his acts of power and might, together with a full account of the greatness of Mordecai, whom the king had promoted, are they not written in the book of the annals of the kings of Media and Persia (10:2)? All the power and might of King Ahasuerus had been transferred to Mordecai, the prime minister of the Persian Empire, by the end of the book. Because he was second only to the king it would have been inconceivable that his name would not have appeared in the official account of the reign of Ahasuerus. Media and Persia names the two kingdoms in chronological order, suggesting perhaps an account covering several centuries. When the author put Persia before Media earlier in 1:3 and 18, he was accurately reflecting the supremacy of Persia in his day.140

Some think it unlikely that a Jew such as Mordecai could have held such a high position in the Persian Empire. But the Murashu documents show that in Nippur at least two Jews had relatively important positions. And as Joseph had become prime minister of Egypt (see my commentary on Genesis, to see link click JvJoseph as Prime Minister), Mordecai became prime minister of Persia. Providence! The other is Dani’el, close to Esther chronologically, who served in an official capacity in the court of Nebuchadnezzar among others (Dani’el 5:29; 6:1-2 and 28).141

Mordecai the Jew was second in rank to King Ahasuerus, preeminent among the Jews, and held in high esteem by his many fellow Jews, because he worked for the good of his people and spoke up for the welfare of all the Jews (10:3). When life returned to normal after the crisis, Mordecai continued to use his status as prime minister to benefit his people. When Haman had worn Ahasuerus’ signet ring, he was for all practical purposes, the king of the enemy of the Jews. But after Mordecai wore the same ring he was, in reality, king of the Jews. As the majority of the Israelites continued to live in lands governed by pagan power, Mordecai became the model of a Jew who could achieve success in a pagan world and used that achievement for the protection and well-being of the Jewish people.142 The book ends with a picture of peace, happiness and prosperity of the Jews under the beneficent rule of a Gentile king and the Jewish prime minister.

As the original Jewish readers read this book they would have been struck by the way ADONAI’s sovereignly protected them, often when they did not even know it. Many of the circumstances in the book were beyond anyone’s control except for the LORD. Esther is filled with irony, with ways in which events turned out unexpectedly and benefiting God’s people.

There are few books of the TaNaKh more relevant to life in a society hostile to the Gospel. Believers are scattered throughout the world waiting for the Lord’s return. Although He is present and active now as much as ever, He is usually hidden behind the events of life that He is directing for His own glory and the benefit of His children. Although the god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God (2 Corinthians 4:4), those who have their Father’s eyes are able to recognize His hand at work in the affairs of life. In a world in which hostility to those who love ADONAI, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Exodus 3:16) seems to grow more extreme every day, let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for He who promised His blessings upon us is faithful (Hebrews 10:23).

Praise you dear Father God, You are Almighty and You always have the last word. Kings and kingdoms change, but you never change. Your glory and kingdom will never end. While I was watching, thrones were set up, and the Ancient of Days took his seat. His garment was as white as snow, and the hair of His head like pure wool. His throne was ablaze with flames, its wheels a burning fire. A river of fire was flowing and coming out from before Him. Thousands of thousands attended Him and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before Him.  The court was seated, and the books were opened (Dani’el 7:9-10).

I was watching in the night visions. Behold, One like a Son of Man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days, and was brought into His presence. Dominion, glory and sovereignty were given to Him that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will never pass away, and His kingdom is one that will not be destroyed (Dani’el 7:13-14).

You are always Almighty, all wise, all loving and always there to help Ysour children. For God Himself has said, “I will never leave you or forsake you” (Hebrews 13:5). Praise, love and worship You! In Yeshua’s holy name and power of His resurrection. Amen

2021-02-23T23:45:22+00:000 Comments

Ce – The Messianic Implications of Esther

The Messianic Implications of Esther

In the text itself, the feast of Purim contains no direct reference to Messiah. It does, however, have something to teach us about the messianic People, the Jews and the messianic Kingdom.

The book of Esther is another example of the principle found in the Abrahamic Covenant: whoever curses you I will curse (Genesis 12:3b). This principle teaches that God will curse those who curse the Jews. This ensures the survival of Isra’el during the Times of the Gentiles (see my commentary on Revelation, to see link click AnThe Times of the Gentiles). The Torah emphasizes that no matter how bad things get for the children of Jacob, they will survive. That is a biblical guarantee.

The most important principle taught about the messianic People in Esther is the example of God’s providence to secure the survival of Isra’el after being scattered into all the nations of the world after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The name of God, YHVH (see my commentary on Exodus AtI AM Has Sent Me To You), is hidden within the book (1:20, 5:4 and 5:13) because God was working behind the scenes for their good. He was working on the basis of the Abrahamic Covenant, especially upon the principle: whoever curses you I will curse. The book of Esther is a great example of God’s providence.

Over the course of human history, I am sure that Elohim seemed absent from many Jews only to be hidden from their view, working behind the scenes for their good. The LORD’s providence involves the protection of His creation against harm or destruction. This is particularly evident in the preservation of Isra’el as a nation.

For example, the hand of ADONAI was present in providing for the needs of His people at the time of the great worldwide famine (see my commentary on Genesis JuSeven Years of Abundance will Come to Egypt but Seven Years of Famine will Follow). God had brought Joseph to Egypt to make provision for feeding the people in the time of great shortage.

The sparing of the children of Abraham in the time of Moses is also particularly noteworthy. By ordering the killing of Israelite male children, Pharaoh attempted to eliminate Isra’el as a nation by assimilating them into Egyptian society and eliminating them as a separate and distinct people (see my commentary on Exodus AhSo God Was Kind to the Midwives). Yet the midwives saved those baby boys, and remarkable circumstances spared the life of Moses.

The series of plagues designed to deliver the Israelites from their oppressors ended in the death of the firstborn of all the households in Egypt. Yet the firstborn children of the Israelites, or even faithful Egyptians, were spared if their parents had the blood of the lamb over the doorframe of their houses (see my commentary on Exodus BwChrist and the Passover).

When they fled and were pursued by the Egyptians, the children of Isra’el were enabled to pass through the Sea of Reeds on dry land, while the Egyptians were engulfed in the waters and drowned (see my commentary on Exodus CiThe Waters Were Divided and the Israelites Went Through the Sea on Dry Ground).

In their wilderness wanderings, God’s chosen people received miraculous provision, primarily manna, but quails (see my commentary on Exodus CsThat Evening Quail Came and Covered the Camp), and water as well (see my commentary on Exodus CuStrike the Rock and Water Will Come Out of It). They were given victories in battle, sometimes against great odds, as they sought to take the Land promised to them from those who occupied it.136

In the Babylon Captivity, the LORD’s work of preservation is again very striking. Shadrach (Hanniah), Meshack (Azuriah) and Abednego (Mishael) were condemned to be burned alive in the fiery furnace for failure to worship the golden image that had been set up. Yet they emerged unharmed from the furnace, while the flames destroyed those who cast them in. Dani’el, because he prayed to his God, was thrown into a den of hungry lions, yet he emerged unharmed.137

The book of Esther shows God’s use of providence to secure the survival of Isra’el during the period of the Dispersion. While great segments of the Jews may be killed, as it was with the Holocaust, Elohim has guaranteed that the Jews as a people and as a nation will survive. And so it will be until Isra’el’s national salvation when Messiah returns (see my commentary on Isaiah KgThe Second Coming of Jesus Christ to Bozrah). At that time there will be no further threat to Jewish survival whatsoever.138

2020-09-05T15:44:01+00:000 Comments

Cd – Shabbat Zachor and Special Purims

Shabbat Zachor and Special Purims

There are special Purims in Judaism. Besides the main one, the Purim in the book of Esther, there are special Purims in various Jewish communities around the world. Shabbat Zachor (Shabbat of Remembrance), for example, is the Shabbat immediately preceding Purim. Deuteronomy 25:17-19, describing the attack by Amalek, is remembered. There is a tradition from the Talmud that Haman, the antagonist of the Purim story, was descended from AmalekThe portion that is read includes a commandment to remember the attack by Amalek, and therefore at the public reading, both men and women make a special effort to hear the reading.  In addition to Shabbat Zachor, whenever a Jewish community was saved from danger, there was usually a local observance that would imitate the format of Purim. There would be a day of fasting before the day of feasting. They would read the Megillah, or a written scroll that recorded the new experience and retelling the new story. They would also repeat some of the prayers that they would normally recite on the feast day. Altogether, there are over one-hundred special Purims among the various Jewish communities around the world.135

2024-03-23T11:18:50+00:000 Comments

Cc – Purim Parodies

Purim Parodies

Purim parodies began in the twelfth century AD and started as a distinct branch of literature in Italy. These Purim parodies were either songs or poems that were a parody. Often they deal with the Passover, but in parody form.134

2022-12-14T12:49:39+00:000 Comments

Cb – Purim Plays

Purim Plays

Another interesting thing about Purim and Judaism is that there has been the development of different Purim plays. Very often these plays involve a rabbi and a king.133

2022-12-14T12:48:46+00:000 Comments

Ca – Purim Pranks

Purim Pranks

In the course of Jewish history, various kinds of Purim pranks were developed, but three were the most important. The first prank was the burning of Haman in effigy. This practice began in Babylonia and Persia during the Talmudic period.

The second prank was that of “beating” Haman in the synagogue. As the book of Esther was read, whenever the reader came to the name of Haman, there would be a “beating ceremony.” There have been many different practices throughout Jewish history. Sometimes Haman’s name was written on two small stones and these were beaten together until his name was destroyed. Sometimes Haman’s name was written on the sole of the shoes, and when his name was read, everyone would stomp their feet on the floor as a symbol of “beating” him. These two symbols of “beatings” are not practiced today as much as a third one is. Today, a noisemaker known as a “grogger” is used. Whenever Haman’s name comes up during the reading, along with the “grogger,” people stomp their feet and boo. Haman’s name is mentioned fifty-four times, so this response is repeated many times. The same response is heard with the naming of Haman’s ten sons for a total of sixty-four times.

The third prank is masquerading and wearing masks. It is customary on this date to masquerade. It is almost a form of Jewish Halloween in Isra’el. These masks portray the various characters in the Book of Esther.132

2020-09-05T15:25:40+00:000 Comments
Go to Top