By – The Report of the Spies 13: 26-33

The Report of the Spies
13: 26-33

The report of the spies DIG: What kind of report do you think the people were expecting? What is the significance of the word “however” at the beginning of 13:28? How did Caleb attempt to silence the people? With their history of victories (Exodus Ch 7- 15), why and how do you think Isra’el should have been able to overcome the giants?

REFLECT: Does the promise of God come without struggle? What are some of the obstacles you had to overcome to see the promise of God fulfilled in your life? Have you ever trusted human wisdom and experience more than God’s promises? How does ministry suffer when it is based on human wisdom? Ask God to give you Caleb’s perspective.

And the unfaithful ten spread an evil lie about the Land they had spied out.

According to the Torah, the wilderness wanderings were marked by two egregious sins; the apostasy of the golden calf (Exodus Chapters 32-34) and the faithlessness of the spies (Numbers Chapters 13-14). Only these two sins are singled out for special mention in the survey of the wilderness journey given by Deut 1:19-45 and 9:1-24; and only in connection with these two sins does God threaten the annihilation of Isra’el and the fulfillment of the patriarchal promise through Moshe (Exodus 32:10; Numbers 14:12).236

Forty days later, they returned from spying out the Land and immediately went to Moshe, Aaron and the entire community of the people of Isra’el at Kadesh-barnea in the Pa’ran Desert, where they brought back word to them and to the entire community and showed them the fruit of the Land (13:26). The sages teach that this took place on the Ninth of Av (see the commentary on The Life of Christ, to see link click Mt The Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple on Tisha B’Av in 70 AD).What they told Moses was this: “We entered the Land where you sent us, and indeed it does flow with milk (good for grazing) and honey (good for agriculture) – here is its fruit, the grapes, the pomegranates and the figs (13:27)!

Nevertheless (Hebrew: ephes), this term denotes human impossibility. This one word revealed their unpardonable offense. Had they simply said that the people of Canaan were mighty and the cities fortified, they would merely have stated a fact and thus discharged their duty. But in that one word, ephes and in describing the mighty people guarding the frontiers, they gave their own verdict that it was beyond Isra’el’s power to conquer the Land.

Nevertheless, the people living in the Land are fierce, and the cities are fortified and very large. Moreover, we saw the giant descendants of Anak there (13:28). We can’t attack those people, because they are stronger than we are (13:31). They were notoriously large warriors, and according to later biblical accounts, remnants of those giants remained west of Canaan in the Philistine regions of Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod (Joshua 11:21-22). Four of those giants were killed by David’s men (see the commentary on the Life of David EgDavid’s Heroes), and the great giant Goliath of Gath was slain by the young warrior David with a slingshot (see the Life of David AlDavid Kills Goliath)

The Amalekites live in the area of the Negev; the Canaanite Hittites, the Jebusites and the Amorites live in the hills; and the Canaanites live along the Mediterranean coastal plain and the Jordan Valley (13:29). The Canaanites were the indigenous population of Canaan. The Amorites had entered Canaan from northeast Aram (Syria) sometime before 2000 BC, had driven the Canaanites out of the hill country, and taken their place there. The Hittites originated in central Anatolia (modern Turkey) about 1800 BC and slowly spread south and southeast, probably identifying with the Amorites in Canaan. Nothing is known of the Jebusites except that they were centralized in Jerusalem. They remained in control of Jerusalem until 400 years after Moses, when David drove them out, capturing the City, and making it his capital in 1003 BC (see the Life of David CoDavid Conquers Yerushalayim).237

The sight of the Amalekites did not dishearten Caleb and Joshua at all. Caleb silenced (Hebrew: vaiyahas, an imperfect verb) the people toward Moshe. This imperfect verb tells us two things. First, the spies’ report that was given to Moses was also in earshot of the people. It was negative enough to cause a verbal stir among them. Second, it tells us that the report evoked such a strong response that Caleb had to continually attempt to keep them quiet enough for him to speak. Interestingly enough, it says that Caleb had to silence the people “toward Moshe.” This indicates that already there was another rebellion brewing among the people.238

The suspense builds. Will the Israelites be encouraged by the reports and evidence of the Land’s fertility? Will the good news about the Land overcome their fears about the great size and strength of the enemy in Canaan? There was apparently some muttering among the Israelites until Caleb quieted the people and said: We ought to go up immediately and take possession of it; there is no question that we can conquer it (13:30).239 Though Caleb and Joshua saw the same things that the other ten spies had seen, their assessment of the situation was completely different. They looked at the Amalekites and the Canaanites through the eyes of faith.

There is a difference between a blind faith and a seeing faith. Blind faith is uninterested in the data. “Don’t confuse me with the facts.” A seeing faith sees the real world with all of its problems, but it interprets that world in steadfast confidence. It is an unquenchable spirit of optimism, a confidence in God’s ability to utterly transcend each and every obstacle. In the end, the dreaded Amalekites fell before Joshua and Caleb. At that time Joshua went and destroyed the Anakites from the hill country: from Hebron, Debir and Anab, from all the hill country of Judah, and from all the hill country of Isra’el. Joshua totally destroyed them and their towns. No Anakites were left in Israelite territory; only in Gaza, Gath and Ashdod did any survive (Joshua 11:21-22).

The city of Hebron was inherited by Caleb. Moshe declared: Caleb, the son of Jephunneh; he shall see it, and to him and to his sons I will give the land on which he has set foot, because he has followed ADONAI faithfully (Deuteronomy 1:36). Hebron was the first place in the Land that his foot had stepped (see Bx – Spying Out the Land). The very city which had so frightened the other ten spies on their entry into the Promised Land came to be his own possession. So, Joshua blessed Caleb and gave him Hebron as his inheritance. Therefore, Hebron has belonged to Caleb ever since, because he followed ADONAI, the God of Isra’el, wholeheartedly. Hebron used to be called Kiriath Arba after Arba, who was the greatest man among the Anakites (Joshua 14:13-15). The dreaded Anakites came to nothing.240

Caleb tried to encourage the people to go into the Land. But the balance tipped when all the spies except for Joshua and Caleb, lied about both the Land and its inhabitants, making them seem like primordial monsters. Bypassing Moshe and Aaron, they spread an evil (Hebrew: dibbat, this term contains within it the idea of negativity, falsehood, and strife) and lied about the land they had spied out for the people of Isra’el. When Numbers 14:27 adds the word evil (Hebrew: ra, meaning bad, evil): How long am I to put up with this evil community who keep grumbling about Me? it merely clarifies what is already implicit. Their report was, then, false and negative – designed to produce strife. This means that the whole intent of the spies from the start was to present a negative picture and a false report to the people of Isra’el. The content of their report shows that they were using exaggeration to sway the people. It was no longer a land flowing with milk and honey, but a land that devoured its inhabitants. A lie. All the people we saw there were giants. A lie (13:32)!241

We saw the Nephilim (see the commentary on Genesis CaThe Sons of God Married the Daughters of Men), the descendants of Anak, who made us look like small grasshoppers by comparison, and we looked that way to them too (13:33)! A lie. The Nephilim, who were destroyed by the Flood, were so named because they caused those who saw them to fall down (Hebrew: nafal) in fear for their lives. There were descendants of Anak there, but there were no Nephilim there. It was just something they threw in to bolster their case.242They even stooped so low as to use their children as an excuse not to go in, saying that they would be taken from them as booty (Numbers 14:3 and Deuteronomy 1:39).

The evil report prevailed. And in doing so, they renounced God’s promise to accompany them with His awesome Presence, to grant them decisive victory in what seemed, humanly speaking, to be overwhelming odds, and therefore, to give them their rightful inheritance as the people of God – a homeland of abundant prosperity. But the full possession of the Promised Land in freedom was, and always will be, dependent upon the people’s faithfulness.243

To an unbelieving world, it’s unreasonable for anybody to trust a God they’ve never seen or heard, but we have all the evidence we need to convince us that ADONAI is dependable and has the power to accomplish what He says He will do. What He promises. He is able to perform, being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised (Romans 4:21). Isra’el had seen what YHVH did to the Egyptians and to the Amalekites (see the commentary on Exodus CvThe Amalekites Attacked the Israelites at Rephidim), and they had every assurance that He would never fail His people.

Unbelief is serious because it challenges the character of ADONAI and rebels against the will of God. But without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6). For whatever is not of faith is sin (Romans 14:23). Moses reminded the people of what God had already done for them (Deuteronomy 1:29-33), but they wouldn’t stop complaining. They were sure that the best thing to do was return to Egypt and go back into bondage.244

2024-08-11T22:45:18+00:000 Comments

Bx – Spying Out the Land 13: 17-25

Spying Out the Land
13: 17-25

Spying out the Land DIG: What were the spies looking for? What did they find? After being gone forty days, what should be the people’s reaction to all this? Why should the cluster of grapes have brought the spies great joy? Why didn’t it?

REFLECT: Where are you in your exploration of the abundant life in Messiah? Are the “grapes” still as big, getting even bigger, or going sour? What has God done recently, to keep you on the growing edge of your faith? Who can you share that with?

The cluster of grapes should have brought them great joy, but it only brought fear.

When Moses sent them to spy out the land of Canaan, he said: Go up through the Negev (referring to all the desert of southern Canaan, especially the area from Beersheba south), and ascend into the hill country, consisting of the mountains of Judah, north to the hills of Ephraim, and all the way to the heights of Galilee (13:17).  This implies a totality of the Land. In Moses’ time, the hill country was populated primarily by the Amorites, and the plains and valleys by the Canaanites.232 When the spies returned, they were able to report: Amalek lives in the area of the Negev; the Hitties, the Jebusites and the Amorites live in the hills; and the Canaanites live by the sea and alongside the Jorden (13:29).

Moshe didn’t send the spies out to determine whether or not Isra’el should enter the Land. That was a natural assumption. He only sent them out to determine the best way to do it. For forty days the twelve spies traveled throughout the Promised Land to see what it was like. To see whether, militarily, the people who live there are strong or weak, few or many. What kind of land do they live in? Is it good or bad? What kind of towns do they live in? Are they unwalled or fortified? How is the soil? Is it fertile or poor? Are there trees in it or not? Do your best to bring back some of the fruit of the land (13:18-20a). They were to investigate the cities to determine if they were walled, fortified or open for seizure. In addition, they were to assess the quality of the Land, the topography, soil and vegetation. They were even to bring back samples.233

So, they went up and explored the land from the Desert of Zin, above the wilderness of Para, as far as Rehob, near Lebo Homath (13:21). The journey of the spies began in the southernmost extremity of the Land (the Desert of Zin) and took them to the northernmost point (Rehob, near Lebo Hamath). This journey of about 250 miles in each direction took them forty days (13:25).

As they ascended in the Land, they entered the Negev from Hebron. Moshe mentions that it had been built seven years before Zoan in Egypt to emphasize how old it was. Zoan was the capital of the Hiksos pharaohs and considered one of the oldest cities in the ancient Middle East. So Hebron was a very ancient city. The first city the spies came to was Hebron. At Hebron, Abraham had purchased the Macphelah cave at Hebron lay Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebecca, and Jacob and Leah (except for Rachael). Yet, the knowledge that they stood in the presence of their forefathers did not bring the spies any comfort. Instead of looking at the patriarchs and their promises, the spies only noticed the size of the buildings and the height of its inhabitants.

It was at Hebron that the spies encountered the tribes of Ahiman, Sheshai and Talmai, the descendants of Anak (13:22). It was apparently this initial encounter at Hebron that so utterly discouraged the spies. The Anakites were giants (First Samuel 17:4; Deuteronomy 2:21, 3:11, and 9:2). When reporting back to Moses and the Israelites, the spies declared: The people living in the land are fierce, and the cities are fortified and very large. Moreover, we saw the descendants of Anak there (13:28). The spies regarded them as nothing less than Nephilim (see the commentary on Genesis, to see link click CaThe Sons of God Married the Daughters of Men), even though it would have been impossible for them to have survived Noah’s flood.

Though the Negev is semi-arid, it must have seemed like paradise after the harsh wilderness of Sinai. The spies would have observed fields, grazing lands, and soil that could be cultivated. North of the Negev, they would have begun the ascent into the hill country of Judah where sufficient rainfalls allowed for vines and orchards. The ascent into the orchards and vineyards of the hill country must have been like stepping into Eden to them.234

It was the season for the first ripe grapes, or late spring around June (13:20b). It had been a long time since the Israelites had tasted wine. When they reached the Valley of Eshkol (meaning cluster) they cut off a branch bearing a single cluster of grapes. Two of them carried it on a pole between them, along with some pomegranates and figs. That place was called the Valley of Eshkol because of the cluster of grapes the Israelites cut off there (13:23-24). The grapes they brought back were wine grapes, of course. Therefore, those grapes were a symbol of joy the Land would provide for them. As is well known, the present state of Isra’el uses the logo of the two men carrying an immense cluster of grapes on a pole as the symbol of the Department of Tourism. The Bible does not specify which of the men carried the grapes; but the modern tourism department identifies them as Caleb and Joshua!

At the end of forty days they returned from exploring the Land (13:25). Sadly, the size of the cluster those spies brought back to the camp produced fear for the faithless. Such a large cluster of grapes was intimidating and demoralizing to them. However, it ought to have intoxicated them with joy; instead, they were drunk with paralyzing terror.235

Dear Heavenly Father, Praise You that no matter how many “giant problems” I face, You are always more powerful than the problem, and always right there with me to help and to guide. For God Himself has said, “I will never leave you or forsake you,” (Hebrews 13:5c). Thank You so much that You not only paid the great price to rescue me from sin’s deadly powers; but You also live within me. Yeshua answered and said to him: If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word. My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home within him (John 14:23). Living within means that You are right there with me at all times. How wonderful!

Praying and trusting in You are the wisest actions to take when trouble rears its ugly head. Thank You so much that as I pray according to Your will, you both hear each of my prayers and You promise to answer in Your way and Your time.  Now this is the confidence we have before Him – that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.  And if we know that He hears us – whatever we ask – we know that we have the requests we have asked from Him (First John 5:14-15). You are such a fantastically wonderful Heavenly Father! I bend the knee in loving worship of You and look forward to praising Your great Name throughout all eternity! In Messiah Yeshua’s holy Name and power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-11T22:22:14+00:000 Comments

Bw – The Selection of the Spies 13: 1-16

The Selection of the Spies
13: 1-16

The selection of the spies DIG: Isra’el was on the brink of realizing their dream of the Promised Land. How do you think they felt? Why send out spies to explore the Land (see Deuteronomy 1:20-23)? Why do the names of the ten faithless spies become markers of sadness? Who stands out in the list of names? Why did Moshe change Hoshea’s name to Joshua?

REFLECT: Isra’el was on the edge of an adventure in Canaan. Where are you in your exploration of the Promised Land? Thank God that He is always faithful to His promises. What encourages your faith in God? Who can you tell about it this week? Have you ever been selected to participate in a ministry? How did you handle it? What did you learn?

Parashah 36: Sh’lach L’Cha (Send on your behalf) 13:1 to 15:41
(See my commentary on Deuteronomy, to see link click AfParashah)

The Key People are Moshe, one spy from each tribe (Caleb, Igal, Hoshea, Palti, Gaddiel, Gaddi, Ammiel, Sethur, Nahbi, Geuel), Amalek, Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Canaanites, Nephilim, the whole nation of Isra’el, Aaron, and a Shabbat wood gatherer.

The Scene is the Desert of Paran, Canaan from the Desert of Zin to Rehob, Hebron, the Valley of Eshcol, Kadesh, the Tent of Meeting, and Hormah.

The Main Events include sending spies, a bad report, God’s desire to destroy the nation, Moshe intervening, the 40-year delay, changing minds too late, defeat, mitzvot about offerings, a man stoned for gathering wood on the Sabbath, and tsitisit (a fringe that was put on a garment) to remind the Israelites to follow the commands of ADONAI.

The twelve spies discovered nothing that God hadn’t already told them.

There are several turning points in Isra’el’s history. The parashah before us is one that gives an account of one of these times. It is one of the most famous stories in the Torah; but it is also one of the most tragic. For, in this parashah, we find Isra’el on the threshold of the Promised Land.226 After long weeks of travel through the scorched wilderness, the children of Isra’el arrived at Kadesh in the Paran Desert. It was a vast wasteland of dry and choking land, but Kadesh was a well-watered oasis of life in its midst. Several springs burst forth with a generous supply of water. At Kadesh, the wilderness was green.

The oasis of Kadesh was poised to the southwest of the Negev, between the Arabah and the coast. From there, several options were open to Isra’el. They might have moved up directly into the Negev and began to occupy and settle the Land at once. They might have swept over to the Mediterranean coast and begun the assault on the fortified coastal cities, establishing them as a base from which to take the higher lands of the hill country and Galilee. They might have crossed the Arabah into the Transjordan, encountering Edomites, Amorites, and Moabites. All of those options were possible. Which was best?

ADONAI didn’t expect Isra’el to enter the Land unprepared or to take it by blind faith. Rather, they were to spy it out, assess the strategic situation and create a plan for conquest. The faith component was to trust in God for the victory – and even this was not blind faith. They had seen Pharaoh’s army destroyed. They had seen Amalek defeated. Ha’Shem is a warrior (Joshua 5:13-15). His Sh’khinah glory was a visible presence in their midst (to see link click BkThe Pillar of Cloud and Fire). Theirs was not a blind faith at all.227

ADONAI said to Moshe, “Send men on your behalf to spy out the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the people of Isra’el (13:1-2). This is all in keeping with the Abrahamic Covenant (see the commentary on Genesis EgI AM the LORD, Who Brought You Out of Ur of the Chaldeans to Give You This Land). Years after these events, Moses reflected on them. As he recounted the story in his speech in Deuteronomy to the sons and daughters of those who lived the account, he filled in some details this chapter omits. Moshe’s words to the people were to rise up, to go up, to begin the attack, and to seize the Land (Deuteronomy 1:21). But the people petitioned him first to send in spies to discover the best routes for making their assault successful. Basically, Moses basically got talked into it by the people (see the commentary on Deuteronomy AmSending in the Spies). Why did they need to investigate what YHVH had already given to them? They should have known better. Ha’Shem had taken them out of Egypt, through the Sea of Reeds and given them the Tabernacle and the priesthood. The Canaanites should have been afraid of THEM like they were forty years later (Joshua 2:9-11)!

But when we return to Numbers 13:1-2, we see that the command to send the men was also made by YHVH. It is likely that Deuteronomy 1:21-23 presents the story from the point of view of the people, and that Numbers 13:1-2 presents the same account from the divine perspective. When the people requested that the men be sent, Moses decided, on the basis of the will of God, to grant their request. Both accounts melt into one. What we gain from putting the two accounts together, however, is the idea that sending men to scout out the Land was a further example of the LORD’s grace to the people.228

From each ancestral tribe send someone who is a leader in his tribe.” Moshe dispatched them from the Paran Desert as ADONAI had ordered; all of them were leading men among the people of Isra’el (13:3). As in the records of the first ten chapters, the story begins with the compliance of Moses with the will of YHVH. He did just as God commanded in selecting one worthy individual from each tribe to represent his people on the scouting mission. The names mentioned here in verses 4-15 are different from those given for the tribal leaders in Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 10. Presumably the tribal leaders in the four earlier lists were older men. The task of the special agents called for men who were younger and could endure the rigors and dangers involved in spying out the Land. However, as physically capable as they might have been, their lack of spiritual maturity proved to be fatal to the Exodus generation when they refused God’s gift of the land of Canaan (see ByThe Report of the Spies).

The twelve spies traveled about five hundred miles during the forty days of the survey of Canaan, but they discovered nothing that God hadn’t already told them! They already knew the names of the pagan nations that lived in the Land (Gen 15:18-21), that it was a good land (Ex 3:8), and a rich land flowing with milk and honey (3:8 and 17). They saw the incredible fruit of the land and brought back a huge bunch of grapes for the people to see. They even visited Hebron, where the patriarchs of Isra’el were buried with their wives (Numbers 13:22; Genesis 23:2 and 19, 49:29-31, and 50:13). But, did the reminder of the faith of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph encourage their own trust in God? For ten of the spies, the answer was a resounding “No!”229

There is a symmetry in this chapter, as we have seen in other occasions. The whole impression is orderly and straightforward, thus granting a sense of importance and dignity. The travel of the spies begins in the Desert of Paran (in verse 3), and it was to that wilderness that they returned (in verse 26). The text comes full circle geographically. But the men who came back were not the same as the men who left. Presumably they left in confidence, with a spirit of adventure; but they returned in fear, groveling before mere human beings and no longer trusting in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Here are their names: We meet Caleb for the first time in 13:6, but he will be mentioned thirty-one more times in the TaNaKh. He and Hoshea (Joshua) were the only members of the Exodus generation to enter the Promised Land. The rest of them died in the wilderness. Thus, because of the failure of the majority, their names become markers of sadness, as do the names of the places of Isra’el’s judgment. For example, Tev’erah (11:3) meaning burning because ADONAI’s fire broke out against them, and Kivrot-HaTa’avah meaning graves of greed, because there they buried the people who were so greedy (11:34).230

from the tribe of Reuben, Shamua the son of Zakur;
from the tribe of Simeon, Shafat the son of Hori;
from the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh;
from the tribe of Issachar, Yig’al the son of Yosef;
from the tribe of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Nun;
from the tribe of Benjamin, Palti the son of Rafu;
from the tribe of Zebulun, Gadi’el the son of Sodi;
from the tribe of Joseph, that is, from the tribe of Manasseh, Gadi the son of Susi;
from the tribe of Dan, ‘Ammi’el the son of G’malli;
from the tribe of Asher, S’tur the son of Mikha’el;
from the tribe of Naphtali, Nachbi the son of Vofsi; and
from the tribe of Gad, Ge’u’el the son of Makhi (13:4-15).

These are the names of the men Moshe sent out to spy out the Land. Moshe gave to Hoshea the son of Nun the name Joshua (13:16). The particular significance of Joshua is noted here. We have already discovered that Joshua was an attendant of Moses from his youth and was especially concerned about his master’s reputation when it seemed threatened by the independent prophesying of Eldad and Medad (11:27-28). Here, we learn that Joshua’s name was first known as Hoshea, but Moses changed it to Joshua. This parenthetical statement anticipates the later prominence of Joshua. The reader is altered to the significance of this name among those of the spies; here is a man of great destiny. The Hebrew word Hoshea means salvation; the new form of the name Joshua means ADONAI saves. So the new name tells us who is actually responsible for this salvation. Both forms are foundations of the Hebrew spelling for the name of Yeshua.

Moshe’s act of changing Hoshea’s name to Joshua was a mark of a special relationship between the two men. This change of name, which is slight – something of a play on words – is a fatherly action on Moses’ part; it is also a prophetic action. It is as though Moshe had adopted his young aide and marked him for greatness. We are reminded of the way the LORD changed the name of Abram to Abraham (Genesis 17). The names are related, but in the changing of the name, a new relationship results.

It is notable that the two agents who gave a report that was faithful to the promise of God represented the two tribes that would later become the most prominent in the Land. Joshua was from the tribe of Ephraim, the tribe that would become dominant in the north; and Caleb was from the tribe of Judah, the dominant tribe in the south. There is something helpful in this fact as well – the two men who stood for faithfulness in God came from prominent tribes.231

Dear Heavenly Father, Praise You for always being faithful! Your love, ADONAI, is in the heavens, Your faithfulness up to the skies (Psalms 36:5). What a comfort it is, Your promise to always care for me. Cast your burden on ADONAI, and He will sustain you. He will never let the righteous be shaken (Psalms 55:22). What a joy that You tell me to not be anxious, but to give You my requests with thanksgiving. Do not be anxious about anything – but in everything, by prayer and petition with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God (Philippians 4:6).

When I pray with thanksgiving before requesting anything, the thanksgiving readjusts my view so the problem seems smaller and my heart is comforted by knowing that You, my all-powerful and all-wise Heavenly Father, have control over all situations. Amazing that not only do You hear my requests but You, the Sovereign Almighty Ruler of the world, promise to accomplish Your will in me. Now this is the confidence we have before Him – that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.  And if we know that He hears us – whatever we ask – we know that we have the requests we have asked from Him (First John 5:14-15). Thank You for being such a wonderful and loving father who can easily conquer any giants in my life! In the holy Name of Messiah Yeshua and the power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-11T22:59:20+00:000 Comments

Bv – The Sin of Kadesh-barnea 13:1 to 14:45

The Sin of Kadesh-barnea
13:1 to 14:45

The decisive rebellion.

The spy story in Numbers 13-14 plays a crucial role within the unifying literary and theological structure of the book. It is closely and directly linked to the two census lists in Numbers Chapter 1 and Numbers Chapter 26 and is recalled as important ways in the second half of the book in Chapters 32 and 34. The spy story is explicitly linked to the first census list in Numbers Chapter 1 through its use of the specific age formula, every single one of you who were included in the census over the age of twenty (14:29). The same phrase is used repeatedly as a formula throughout the numbering of the twelve tribes in the first chapter of Numbers. The spy story is also explicitly tied in with the second census list in Chapter 26. An addendum at the end of the census in 26:63-65 reads: These are the ones counted by Moshe and Eleazar the priest, who took a census of the people of Isra’el in the plains of Mo’av by the Jordan across from Jericho. But there was not a man among them who had also been included in the census of Moshe and Aaron the priest when they enumerated the people of Isra’el in the Sinai Desert; because Adonai had said of them, “They will surely die in the desert.” So there was not even one of them, except Caleb and Joshua.

The addendum clearly alludes to the spy story of Numbers Chapters 13 and 14 in which the definitive judgment of the Exodus generation occurred. The spy story has clear associations with the two pillars of the structure of the book of Numbers, that is, the first census list in Chapter 1 and the second census list in Chapter 26. The theme of the spy story plays a pivotal role in the central narrative in defining the theme of the book of Numbers as a whole – the death of the Exodus generation and the birth of a new generation of hope on the edge of the Promised Land. We will note other references to the spy story later in Chapters 32 and 34, further strengthening the argument for its central place in the theme and structure of Numbers.225

These verses are displayed in a chiastic fashion (see Ac Numbers from a Messianic Jewish Perspective: Chiasm and introversion). The inverted symmetry of this section of Scripture is clear. The selection of unfaithful spies led to the defeat by the Amalekites (A-A), God allowed the ten tribes to spy out the Land in His grace (B-B), but the report of the spies was negative so Moshe had to intercede (C-C). Faith and obedience are the main points (D).

A The selection of the spies (13:1-16)

B Spying out the land (13:17-25)

C The report of the spies (13:26-33)

D Faith and obedience (14:1-4)

C Moshe intercedes (14:5-20)

B Gods Response: discipline, not wrath (14:20-38)

A Defeat by the Amalekites (14:39-45)

2024-08-11T11:57:04+00:000 Comments

Bu – The Rebellion of Miryam and Aaron 12: 1-16

The Rebellion of Miryam and Aaron
12: 1-16

The rebellion of Miryam and Aaron DIG: Where did Aaron and Miryam go wrong? What was their real objection? Why was Miryam disciplined and not Aaron? What is a prophet? What distinguished Moshe from all other prophets? What is humility? What does it mean when it says that Moshe was more than any man who was on the face of the earth?

REFLECT: Is there anything in Chapters 11 and 12 about complaining, discouragement or meekness that is relevant to your life? How so? How does God speak to you? How can the object lesson here help you to be more like Moses and less like Miryam and Aaron? Ask ADONAI to give you greater acceptance for the ministry He has given you.

The rebellion spread to the inner circle.

Moshe’s Ethiopian wife (12:1-2): Miryam and Aaron, Moses’ began criticizing (Hebrew: watedabber, meaning to speak against) Moshe (12:1a). The chapter begins with the feminine singular form of the verb watedabber, indicating that Miryam was the instigator of the rebellion. Aaron was the high priest of Isra’el, brother of Moses. He was simply following his sister’s lead out of a weak will, which tended to be Aaron’s character (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click GqThe Golden Calf Incident). We have heard less of Miryam, but she appeared earlier in key roles in the Exodus. She was the sister of Moshe and named as a prophetess in Exodus 15:20-23. Miryam led the women of Isra’el in song, dance, and praise of God after the successful flight out of Egypt and the defeat of Pharaoh and his army (see Exodus CjSongs of the Sea). Tradition also associates Miryam with the unnamed older sister of Moshe who kept a lookout as the infant Moses floated down the river in a basket (see Exodus AkA Man of the House of Levi Married a Levite Woman). Finally, Micah 6:4 lists all the gracious gifts which YHVH gave Isra’el during its journey through the desert, including Isra’el’s three leaders: I sent before you Moses, Aaron, and Miryam. Thus, Miryam was a leader of the people, a prophetess, a singer of praise of God, a courageous savior of baby Moshe, and a sister to both Aaron and Moses.210

On account of the Cushite woman he had married, for he had in fact married a Cushite woman (12:1b). Moshe had evidently divorced Zipporah (see Exodus AzSurely You are a Bridegroom of Blood to Me) or she has died. Moses’ current marriage could not be criticized unless it were a case of bigamy (for which there is no evidence) for the Cushites were not among those whom Israelites might not marry (Exodus 34:11 and 16). The Cushites were not necessarily a different color since they existed in early times in Arabia as well as Cush proper (what is today southern Egypt, Sudan, and northern Ethiopia). Possibly Miryam, who apparently led this part of the challenge, saw in Moshe’s new wife a threat to her own standing as the major female figure in Isra’el’s leadership.211

The mention of the Cushite woman, however, was just an excuse. The real reason is clear from Miryam and Aaron’s question. She asked: Is it true that ADONAI has spoken only with Moshe? Hasn’t he spoken with us too (12:2a)? Envy, perhaps simmering for a long time, now came to the surface. It is not unlike that in Exodus 2:23-25, where four verbs are used of YHVH’s understanding to His purposes: He hears, He sees, He remembers, and He knows.

The gravity of Miryam and Aaron’s objection can be seen in the terse, ominous, conclusion to the verse. And ADONAI heard them (12:2b). The writer is well aware that Ha’Shem “hears” everything. This special notice means that the LORD heard with an intention of acting, of intervening on behalf of His servant.

The humility of Moshe (12:3): And the writer himself made the remarkable statement that such envy was totally uncalled for since he was not arrogant but was, in fact, very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth. The narrator’s parenthetical comment instantly undercuts Miryam and Aaron’s complaint, and seeks to persuade the reader to stand with Moses in his defense against his siblings.212

There is a teaching in Judaism that contrasts humility against pride in a person’s relationship to God. A prideful person is called “yeish,” that is a “somebody.” He is like a container filled with the essence of himself. There is no room for God within him. Opposed to that, there is a “bitul,” or a person of such total humility that he is like a container with nothing in it. Since the container is empty, it can be filled with God. A person of self-abnegation is transparent, allowing the essence of God to fill him and flow through him. A person who is prideful is opaque. A person of total humility is one through whom a full expression of godliness could be expressed. Such is our Righteous Messiah who humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the Name which is above every name (Philippians 2:8-9).213

The defense of Moshe by ADONAI (12:4-9): God also immediately appears in defense of Moses. Suddenly, ADONAI told Moshe, Aaron and Miryam, “Come out, you three, to the Tabernacle.” The three of them went out and the Sh’khinah glory of ADONAI (see the commentary on Isaiah JuThe Glory of the LORD Rises Upon You) came down and stood at the entrance to the Tabernacle. He summoned Aaron and Miryam, and they both went forward (12:1-5). 

Next is an example of introversion in poetry (see Ac Numbers from a Messianic Jewish Perspective: Chiasm and introversion). The first half describes how God communicates with other prophets (ABC), the second half, describes His unique communication with Moshe (CBA). Verses 6 and 8 each contain sixteen syllables and balance each other perfectly. The pivot sets Moses apart and declares that YHVH confides in Moshe alone.214

Introduction: Then ADONAI said: Listen to what I say:

A. When there is a prophet among you (12:6a). A prophet in the biblical context is not someone who can read minds. This is an occult practice called divination, also forbidden by Torah. A prophet is someone who can hear ADONAI speaking and is commissioned by God to speak on His behalf. The prophetic formula we always find in Scripture is: ADONAI spoke saying, “Speak to so-and-so and say . . .” During the Dispensation of Torah (see Exodus DaThe Dispensation of Torah) they had the singular role of bringing God’s Word – instruction and warnings directly to His people. Thus, they were expected to speak the perfect, inspired Word of God; if not, they were condemned as a false prophet (Jeremiah 14:14-16) and stoned to death (Deut 18:20).

There were prophets in the Dispensation of Grace (see the commentary on Hebrews BpThe Dispensation of Grace) as a ministry to the Church. Agabus (Acts 11:27-28, 21:10-11); Ana the prophetess (Luke 2:36-38); Barnabas, Simon called Niger and Lucius the Cyrene (Acts 13:17); Judas and Silas (Acts 15:32); the four daughters of Philip who prophesied (Acts 21:9); and the apostle John who prophesied in the book of Revelation. Prophets foretold either near historical events or far eschatological events. Once the last book in the Bible was written, the canon of Scripture was closed and there was no need for any further revelation. The Ruach Ha’Kodesh has equipped believers with everything we need to live a victorious life, and thus prophecy has passed away. There is no continuous revelation.

B. I, ADONAI, make Myself known to him in a vision (12:6b). There are many examples of visions in the TaNaKh (Exodus 15:1; Second Samuel 7:17; Isaiah 1:1; Jeremiah 24:1; Ezeki’el 1:1 and 8:3-4; Obadiah 1:1; Nahum 1:1; Habakkuk 2:2-3; Psalm 89:20; Proverbs 29:18; Dani’el 2:19; First Chronicles 17:15).

C. I speak with him in a dream (12:6c). Dreams are mentioned alongside of prophecy as authentic vehicles of God’s revelation (Deut 13:2,4,6), and there are several examples of this: Abimelech (Genesis 20:7), Jacob (Genesis 31:10-13), Solomon (First Kings 3:5-14), and Job (Job 33:14-18).

D. But it isn’t that way with my servant Moshe. He is the only one who is faithful in My entire household (12:7). God did speak through other prophets, but only in the veiled form of visions and dreams (First Samuel 9:9 and Deuteronomy 13:7 for example). Moses, however, was different. He was God’s servant, entrusted with all of God’s House. Ha’Shem’s words strain to describe the intense intimacy of Himself and His servant.215

C. With him I speak face to face (literally in Hebrew mouth to mouth) and clearly (12:8a). Exodus 33:11 had earlier stated that ADONAI used to speak to Moshe face to face, without fear, as one speaks to a friend. Deuteronomy 34:10 underlines the uniqueness of Moses as it describes his death outside the Promised Land: Never since has there arisen a prophet in Isra’el like Moshe, whom ADONAI knew face to face.216

B. Not in riddles (12:8b). Communication between God and Moses was clear, direct, and unmediated. No riddles. No dark sayings. No dreams to be interpreted and figured out. Instead, amazingly, God spoke directly to him. He heard the audible voice of YHVH. Whenever Moses had a question about something, he could just ask God and God would answer him. Moses had access to the Most Holy Place. He could enter behind the inner veil anytime he wanted, any time of year, he could simply stop in on God and ask a question and receive a direct answer. Earlier in Numbers we are told: Now when Moses went into the Tabernacle to speak to YHVH, he heard the Voice speaking to him from above the mercy seat that was on the ark of the covenant, from between the two cherubim, so He spoke to him (Numbers 7:8-9).217

A. He sees the image of ADONAI (12:8c). The terminology related to the image (Hebrew: temunah) of YHVH used here is also echoed in Exodus 20:4 and Deuteronomy 5:8 of the image the Israelites were forbidden to make of their God. Similarly, in Deuteronomy 4:12, 15-16, 23, and 25 it describes that image of God that the people had not seen, as had Moses, and therefore should not make as a visible representation of their God. Yet David, in a state of righteous yearning, prayed that he might see this image of his God (Psalm 17:15). Moses had indeed been granted a special relationship with the LORD, to see that which Isaiah saw (see the commentary on Isaiah BoIn the Year King Uzziah Died). Moshe had seen plainly and openly, more than any other human had ever imagined. Ha’Shem had spoken face to face as a man speaks to his friend (Exodus 33:11). This does not mean that Moshe literally saw God’s face, for if he had done so he would have surely died (Exodus 33:20). But, Moses did see the back side of God’s Sh’khinah glory as He passed by His servant, who was positioned in the cleft of the rock (see the commentary on Exodus GzWhen My Glory Passes by I Will Put You in the Cleft). Only Yeshua, the Incarnate Son of God, had seen the Father in the fullness of His glory. He became what even Moshe would have longed to see. Messiah said: If you have seen Me, You have seen the Father (John 14:8-9).218

Conclusion: So why weren’t you afraid to criticize My servant Moshe? In light of God’s special relationship with Moses, they should have been extremely afraid to challenge his authority, even if he was their younger brother. The anger of ADONAI flared up against them, and he left (12:8d-9). What we see here is the spreading rebellion against God from the mixed multitude (see BpComplaining at Tav’erah) the people to the inner circle.

The punishment of Miryan (12:10-16): When we read that God’s anger flared up against them and then departed, we expected dead bodies to be left after the dust settled. But when the Sh’khinah glory was removed from above the Tabernacle, Miryam had leprosy, as white as snow (see the commentary on Leviticus CgThe Test of M’tsora). Aaron looked at Miryam, and she was as white as snow. Here, the repentance of Aaron is both touching in its intensity and in his concern for his sister. Aaron said to Moshe, “Oh, my lord, please don’t punish us for this sin we committed so foolishly. Please don’t let her be like a stillborn baby, with its body half eaten away when it comes out of its mother’s womb” (12:10-12)! This would have rendered her permanently unclean and untouchable, such was the case in Second Kings 15:5 and Second Chronicles 26:19-21. This was an ironic confirmation of what Aaron and Miryam had earlier denied, Moshe’s unique relationship with YHVH. And unlike the golden calf incident in which Aaron never acknowledged his sinful role in the idolatry (see the commentary on Exodus GqThe Golden Calf Incident), here, Aaron accepts responsibility along with Miryam. Although not fully dead, Miryam’s life had been reduced to that of a stillborn baby. She waited to be reborn.219

Then, Moshe cried to ADONAI, “Oh God, I beg you, please, heal her” (12:13). As Miryam had saved Moses as a baby in Exodus 2, now Moshe returns the favor and intercedes to save his sister in Numbers 12. The Mitzvot concerning skin disease in Leviticus required a seven-day period of quarantine (Leviticus 13:5), and then a seven-day right of purification (Leviticus 14:1-20). However, the seven days do not appear to be a period of quarantine or ritual purification in accordance with the mitzvot in Leviticus; the seven-day banishment was a sign of the shame she had brought upon herself by rebelling against Moses, and thus against YHVH Himself. Like a parent spitting in a child’s face is a sign of shame (Deuteronomy 25:9; Isaiah 50:6), so God ordered that Miryam bear her sin by being shut out of the camp for a week.220 The response of YHVH was graciousness mingled with sobriety. She was defiled, rebuked, and shamed publicly, as if spat upon by her father. So let her be shut out of the camp for seven days; after that, she can be brought back in.” Miryam was shut out of the camp for seven days, and the people did not travel until she was brought back in. So, Miryam caused a delay in the progress towards the Promised Land. Afterwards, the people went on from Hatzerot and camped in the Pa’ran Desert (12:14-16).221

Why did Miryam alone suffer the punishment of leprosy and not Aaron, when he was clearly as involved as Miryam in their rebellion against Moses? But the necessity of ritual purity (see the commentary on Leviticus BjThe Mitzvot of Purification) while he served as high priest needed to be spared. Ultimately, Miryam will be treated equally with her two brothers, co-leaders of the people of Isra’el. They will all join with the rest of the Exodus generation and die outside the Promised Land. The judgment will be all-inclusive, including men and women over twenty-years of age.222

We now come to the last section of commentary on this portion. The text of Numbers 12 focuses attention of Moshe’s life, especially on those things that made him a great leader. Let us do the same now and see how many godly characteristics of Moses, the leader, we can discover. When we do so, we can safely assume that just as ADONAI molded this man to walk after Him, He also does the same with us. Those things which characterized this leader also characterize the new creation believer. Why was Moshe such a great leader?

He took His problems to God. When you lead almost three million people, there is hardly ever a moment when you are not facing a problem. Our text relates that one of the habitual problems of the Israelites happened to have been rebellion, both against God and against Moshe, God’s appointed leader. Such a problem is usually the end of most leaders if it is not handled properly. But, Moses was not your typical leader. We read continually that when problems arose, Moshe took all of them directly to YHVH, sometimes even in the privacy of the Most Holy Place where fellowship between them was the most intimate. A leader cannot afford to handle his or her problems in any other way. They may choose to share the wisdom gained with others. But, ultimately, they must be shared openly and honestly with the only One Who is full of wisdom and truth.

He was honest with God. When confronted with the new rebellion about food (see BrQuail and Manna from ADONAI), Moses had had enough (not of food, but complaints)! He was ready to quit. He said that he would rather die than continue in such a leadership position. And, the Bible tells us that he went right to Ha’Shem with how he felt and thought. When he did so, while not being disrespectful, he, nevertheless, was completely honest with his feelings and thoughts to the Holy One. He knew and trusted the LORD well enough to know that even if he did sin, God is faithful and just to forgive sin and to cleanse of all unrighteousness (First John 1:9).

He was willing to sacrifice for the good of the people. ADONAI endowed Moses with two spiritual gifts; leadership and prophecy (see the commentary on Romans DcResponding to the Mercies of ADONAI). In fact, Moses demonstrated his leadership ability when he willingly shared his leadership with the seventy elders, but actually asked for a plurality of leadership to be put in place (see BtADONAI’s Response). In addition, the Torah states that the prophetic office of Moshe would serve as a model for the prophetic office of Messiah Himself (see the commentary on Deuteronomy DkA Prophet Like Moses). He also was willing to share his prophetic ministry. Can you imagine the pressure of being the only one? At least that’s what Miryam and Aaron thought. But Moses didn’t regard his gift of prophecy as something for only himself. In Chapter 11 when Eldad and Medad were freely prophesying around the camp, Moshe’s chief aid, Joshua, tried to stop them. Rather than being threatened by the public demonstration of the gifts of the Spirit, Moshe replied, “Are you so zealous to protect me? I wish all of ADONAI ’s people were prophets! I wish ADONAI would put His Spirit on all of them” (11:29).

He did not act defensively. Many leaders, when challenged in any of their decisions or ideas, sometimes act in a defensive manner. They do so, perhaps, out of insecurity. If they are trying to derive personal worth and identity from what they do and say, they are easily prone to such behavior. When it comes out, it usually manifests itself in short curt answers, haughty attitudes, judging the one who challenged them, or just plain lack of kindness. Moshe was not like that. When challenged by his family, those who were supposed to know him best, he responded in love and kindness by interceding for his sister, crying out to ADONAI, “Oh God, I beg you, please, heal her” (12:13).

He heard from God in an intimate way. One thing that certainly characterized Moshe’s leadership was his intimate relationship with YHVH. In fact, I would say that this was the one thing which caused the rest of his positive characteristics to show themselves. When Miryam and Aaron challenged him, God Himself came to Moses’ defense. He said a most remarkable thing about His servant. He said: Listen to what I say: when there is a prophet among you, I, ADONAI, make myself known to him in a vision, I speak with him in a dream. But it isn’t that way with My servant Moshe. He is the only one who is faithful in My entire household. With him I speak face to face and clearly, not in riddles; he sees the image of ADONAI. So why weren’t you afraid to criticize my servant Moshe (12:6-8)? God said that Moshe was the most trusted one in all Isra’el because they (Moses and God) met each other in an intimate way.

Summary: Moshe was more humble than anyone else! If there was one word that would characterize Moshe both as a man and as a leader, it would be humility. This is what God Himself said: Now Moses was very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth (12:3). How else could Moshe have walked in the essential characteristics of leadership described above, if he were not a humble man? A key to his leadership was that Moses was not self-serving; he was the servant of YHVH. He was the only one who was faithful in God’s entire household (12:7). If a leader has his mind on himself, his image, his well-being, his goals and aspirations, he will inevitably walk in the flesh and the sheep would not be able to feel safe around him. But if he has his thoughts centered on serving God and His sheep, then he will be a safe leader. This is the godly leader; this is how Yeshua Messiah Himself walked. For the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many (Matthew 20:28).223

Haftarah B’ha‘alotkha: Zechariah 2:14 – 4:7
(see the commentary on Deuteronomy AfParashah)

God comes to Jerusalem! Sing, daughter of Tziyon; rejoice! For, here, I am coming; and I will live among you,” says ADONAI. When that time comes, many nations will join themselves to ADONAI. “They will be my people, and I will live among you.” Then you will know that it was ADONAI-Tzva’ot who sent me to you (Zechariah 2:14-14). The journey that had begun in the wilderness ends at the Temple. Joshua the high priest is made pure – cleansed of the sin that caused the destruction and exile (Zechariah 3:4). He is commanded to walk with ADONAI and await ADONAI’s servant, Tsemach (the Branch). Not by might, nor by power, but by God’s Spirit shall the work be accomplished (Zechariah 4:6). The menorah will no longer require the vigilance of the priests to work through the night because it will receive an unending supply of olive oil straight from the olive oil trees in the Land! All the nations will acknowledge the exalted role of Isra’el among the Gentiles. YHVH will level the mountain to make room for a special gift of grace. All will see the Temple on the mountain, shouting Grace! Grace (Zechariah 4:7)!

B’rit Chadashah B’ha‘alotkha: Revelation 11:19

What begins with the Tribulation Temple (see the commentary on Revelation BxThe Tribulation Temple), and the mission of the two witnesses (see Revelation DcI Will Give Power to My Two Witnesses to Prophesy), culminates in the rescue of the remnant (see the commentary on Isaiah KgThe Second Coming of Jesus Christ to Bozrah). Judgment begins and the Temple of God opens to the eyes of those on earth. The ark of the covenant becomes visible in a Sinai kind of experience witnessed by all (see Revelation DxThe Seventh Trumpet: God’s Temple in Heaven)! Miracles leap from the text! The two witnesses have the power to shut up the skies, causing famine for three-and-a-half-years (Revelation 11:3). This event comes as the nations have the power to trample the outer court for the same time period (11:2). The two witnesses are slain and lay unburied for three-and-a-half-days; but then are raised to life and raptured into heaven, in full view of those who celebrated their deaths (see Revelation DmThe Resurrection of the Two Witnesses). The stage is set for the spiritual journey to culminate with heaven coming to earth!224

Dear Heavenly Father, praise you for Your faithful love that allows me to come to You with my problems. One thing that made Moshe great was that he took his problems to God. Moses had some very big problems, but no problem is too big for You. You desire me to always run to You and fellowship with You, not just about problems but also offering plenty of praise, for You are always good!

You desire to use my problems to bless me. Your heart is so gracious and kind that You can even turn hard times into times of eternal blessing. These trials are so that the true metal of your faith (far more valuable than gold, which perishes though refined by fire) may come to light in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Messiah Yeshua (First Peter 1:7). I can’t imagine how anything could be better than living forever in Your eternal perfect heaven, but more than that, You even promise that You will reward those who serve You with a faithful and loving heart (First Corinthians 3:11-14). You are so worthy to receive all worship and praise! I praise You my Holy, Almighty, All-Powerful, All-Wise, Forgiving Savior and Loving Father. I look forward to praising You thru out all eternity! In Messiah Yeshua’s holy Name and power of His Resurrection. Amen

2024-08-10T12:12:13+00:000 Comments

Bt – ADONAI’s Response 11: 16-35

ADONAI’s Response
11: 16-35

ADONAI’s response DIG: How did God respond to Moses’ complaint of “I can’t do it?” How did God equip the seventy elders? How did Joshua fight against what ADONAI was doing? How would God’s varied responses to Isra’el and Isra’el’s memorial death camp, help them succeed in their journey throughout their wilderness wanderings?

REFLECT: How important is the Ruach in your ministry, in the ministry of the Church? Have you ever fought against the purposes of YHVH because you didn’t understand it? What did you learn in this chapter about the importance of contentment? How do you think God feels when we complain about our life?

A complaining tongue reveals an ungrateful heart.

Moshe was now at the place spiritually where ADONAI wanted him (to see link click BsMoses’ Complaint about the People). He was ready for his next step of growth. For his own good, and for the good of Isra’el, the leadership needed to be shared. This is a critical lesson many spiritual leaders, rabbis and pastors need to learn. Sharing the spiritual leadership not only enhances the well-being of the sheep, it also protects the leader. That’s what Sha’ul seems to imply in First Timothy Chapters 3 through 5, when he teaches that the leadership of God’s people should not be one man, but a plurality of godly leaders.195

Spiritual leadership (11:16-17): ADONAI responded to Moshe’s frustration with a remedy for leadership. He instructed him to select seventy godly leaders to assist him in the spiritual oversight of the camp. Moses already had leaders to help the people settle their personal disputes (see the commentary on Exodus Cy Moses Chose Men from All Isra’el), but these new leaders would have more of a spiritual ministry to the people. After all, the heart of every problem is a problem of the heart, and unless people’s hearts are changed by the Lord, their character and conduct will never change.196 Thus, God said to Moses, “Bring me seventy of the leaders of Isra’el, people you recognize as experienced leaders of the people and officers of theirs. Bring them to the Tabernacle, and have them stand there with you in a supportive role. I will come down and speak with you there, and I will take some of the Spirit of God which rests on you and put it on them. Then they will carry the burden of the people along with you, so that you won’t carry it yourself alone.”

In the B’rit Chadashah, the seventy-member Great Sanhedrin was the equivalent of the Jewish supreme court (see the commentary on The Life of Christ LgThe Great Sanhedrin). Most of its members were guilty of handing Yeshua over to the Romans to be crucified. So, it is absolutely true that in the days of the apostles, it was misguided and mostly wicked. Yet, we must also remember that the vast majority of Israelite history is similarly tainted by corrupt leadership. Wicked kings rose and fell throughout Judah and Isra’el’s history, but we do not demonize the institution of kingship because it was occupied by wicked kings. Also, the Christian Church has a sordid history of antisemitism (see the book The Anguish of the Jews, Twenty-Three Centuries of Antisemitism by Edward H. Flannery, a Stimulus Book, 1985), yet we do not demonize the Church as all bad. All of this is to say that we need to re-examine the institution of the Sanhedrin and acknowledge that it is a biblical institution with God-given authority. Here in Numbers, a portion of the Ruach Ha’Kodesh was empowered into it simply on the basis that it was the ruling body over Isra’el. Thus, Caiaphas, as the high priest and head of the Great Sanhedrin, unwittingly prophesied regarding the Messiah, “Do you not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish” (John 11:50).

The punishment of abundance (11:18-35): There is a popular proverb that says, “Be careful what you wish for . . . because you might get it.” Such was certainly the case with Isra’el in the wilderness. Their disdain for manna and their longing for the familiar led them to cry out for meat. While on the way to Mount Sinai, the children of Isra’el raised a similar cry, which the LORD answered by sending quail into their midst (see the commentary on Exodus CsThat Evening Quail Came and Covered the Camp). But that was only a one-time event. A year later the Israelites had grown to despise the manna that God had given them, and they longed for the quail once again.197

Tell the people, “Prepare yourselves for tomorrow, and you will eat meat; because you cried in the ears of ADONAI, “If only we had meat to eat! We had a good life in Egypt!” The contrast between the true source of blessing is emphasized further when the people proclaimed that they had it better in Egypt. When the people were preparing to leave Sinai, Moses told Hobab that God had promised good things for Isra’el (10:29). But now they claimed things were better for them in Egypt. To attribute goodness to the land of bondage, oppression, and despair was blasphemous, evidence of their brazen rebellion against YHVH. They had rejected His goodness. Now He would turn that which was formerly a means of great blessing into a means of cursing. All right, ADONAI is going to give you meat, and you will eat it. You won’t eat it just one day, or two days, or five, or ten, or twenty days, but a whole month! – until it comes out of your nose and you hate it! – because you have rejected ADONAI, who is here with you, and distressed Him with your crying and asking: Why did we ever leave Egypt (11:18-20)?198

The principle was not meat, of course. ADONAI explained to Moses that the real issue was that the people had rejected Him! He was near in grace, but they had turned their back on Him. He was in their midst, and they wished He were not so close. He had come down, and they wished He would go away. The issue was not just failure to demonstrate proper gratitude to God, who was in their midst and who was their constant source of good; it was turning from Him entirely and resentfully rejecting His many acts of mercy on their behalf. I suspect the only fitting comparison for us today would be to consider who has made a profession of faith in Messiah to say, “I wish You had not died for me! Leave me alone!” Only in these terms can we sense the enormity of the impact in the language of this verse.199

But Moshe, with his head still reeling from the declaration that the LORD would provide meat for all the people for a month, reminded God of the numbers involved, saying: Here I am with six hundred thousand men on foot, and yet you say, “I will give them meat to eat for a whole month!” But the fact that the people were merely looking for an opportunity to complain about their lot in life, he noted: If whole flocks and herds were slaughtered for them, would it be enough? If all the fish in the sea were collected for them, would even that be enough” (11:21-22)? The familiar level of dialogue between Moshe and YHVH highlights the level of trust and relationship that Moses, God’s servant, had with His LORD.

In his grief and disbelief, Moshe had challenged God’s ability to meet the needs of the people in the wilderness. But Ha’Shem quickly and tersely responded with a rhetorical question: Has ADONAI’s arm grown short? Had the right arm of YHVH, which had delivered the Israelites from the bondage of Egypt and brought them through the Sea of Reeds on dry ground, somehow been reduced in power and capability. Absolutely not! Now you will see whether what I said will happen or not (11:23)! So now the reluctant Moshe and the disobedient people were about to experience once more the magnitude of God’s power. In spite of the numerous life illustrations the Israelites had experienced, they had not yet come to the realization of the promise Paul later echoed in Philippians 4:9, “My God will supply all your needs according to His glorious riches in Messiah Yeshua.”200

Moshe went out and told the people what ADONAI had said. Then he collected seventy of the leaders of the people and placed them all around the Tabernacle. ADONAI came down in the fire-cloud (see BkThe Pillar of Cloud and Fire), spoke to Moses, took some of the Spirit that was on him and put it on the seventy leaders. When the Spirit came to rest on them, they prophesied – then, but not afterwards (11:24-25). The Ruach Ha’Kodesh was given temporarily in the Dispensation of Torah (see the commentary on Exodus DaThe Dispensation of Torah). David pleaded: ADONAI, don’t take Your Spirit from me (Psalm 51:11). Therefore, when those men prophesied, it was not a permanent gift, but a temporary one. All that was necessary was for their ministry to be publicly authenticated so the whole community could see that they possessed the same spiritual qualifications and authority as Moses himself.201

To show that the bestowal of the Spirit was an act of God unrelated to Moshe’s presence, ADONAI placed the Ruach Ha’Kodesh on two men, Eldad and Medad, who had not joined the others at the Tabernacle. They were among those listed to go there, but they hadn’t done so, and they continually prophesied in the camp. In fact, they prophesied so much that Joshua, thinking that something was out of order ran and told Moshe, “Eldad and Medad are prophesying in the camp!” Joshua, the son of Nun, who from his youth up had been Moshe’s assistant, answered, “My lord, Moshe, stop them!” Joshua’s alarm was motivated by his loyalty to Moses. Here the true spirit of Moses is demonstrated. Rather than being threatened by Edad and Medad’s spiritual gifts, Moshe replied, “Are you so zealous to protect me? I wish all of ADONAI ’s people were prophets! I wish God would put His Spirit on all of them!” This verse is a suitable introduction to the inexcusable challenge to the leadership of Moshe in Numbers 12. Then Moshe and the leaders of Isra’el withdrew from the entrance to the Tabernacle and returned to the camp (11:26-30).

After the seventy had been selected and properly validated the LORD punished the people for their dissatisfied nature by sending an abundance of quail. The manna was withheld, and the people were given a month’s supply (11:20). ADONAI sent out a wind (Hebrew: ruach) which brought quails from across the sea and let them miraculously fall around the camp. The normal flight pattern of these quail to this day is northeasterly, from the interior of Africa. The wind must have come from the southwest, a most unusual phenomenon, and drove the birds northwest across the Sinai.202 Not only that, but when they got to the camp, God caused them to fly about three feet above the ground so the people could capture them or club them to the ground. The amount of quail was so widespread that they could be found about a day’s trip away on each side of the camp and all around it. Soon after the people began their orgy of lustful gluttony. The scene must have been similar to a riot: people screaming, birds flapping their wings, everywhere the chaotic movement of a meat-hungry people in a sea of birds.203

The people stayed up all that day, all night and all the next day gathering the quails – the person gathering the least collected ten heaps or about sixty bushels of meat. The rabbis teach that each person gathered more than 300 gallons or a little over 1,000 pounds of quail. Then they spread them out for themselves all around the camp (11:31-32). Their sin was, in effect, a rejection of ADONAI and His generous provision in favor of an uncontrollable appetite. As Paul later said of the enemies of Messiah: Their god was their stomach (Philippians 3:9). These figures are staggering! In some ways it reminds us of the great provision of Yeshua in the feedings of the five thousand (Matthew 14:13-21) and the four thousand (Matthew 15:29-39). In those cases the feeding of many from God’s plenty was a demonstration of God’s grace; in the instance here, it was a demonstration of God’s wrath.

When YHVH really wants to judge people, He lets them have their own way (Romans 1: 24, 26, and 28). So God gave them what they asked for, but He sent a plague along with it (Psalm 106:15). The word plague (Hebrew makka, meaning blow or stroke) is used in this sense in seven other places in the TaNaKh. In Deuteronomy 28-29 the term parallels words for sickness or disease. In First Samuel 4 the term describes the plagues of Egypt. The similar verb occurs in Exodus 3:20 and 9:15 to describe these plagues. In the present context (a large supply of meat), the most natural conclusion is some sort form of food poisoning.204

The drama of the scene is superb: But while the meat was still in their mouth, before they had chewed it up, the anger of ADONAI flared up against the people, and ADONAI struck the people with a terrible plague (Numbers 11:33; Psalm 78:23-31; First Corinthians 10:10). Like so many places in Isra’el’s history, the names of places reflected their experience with YHVH. As Bethel (house of God) derived from Jacob’s encounter with God in the central hill country, and Tav’erah (burning) reminded the Israelites of God’s fiery holocaust, so now the graves of the ravenous would become a memorial to the results of the rebellion against the LORD their God.205 Therefore, that place was named Kibroth-Hattaavah [graves of greed], because there they buried the people who were so greedy (11:34). Perhaps the people doubted the adequacy of the provision and rushed in a greedy manner upon the quail, each one trying to get more than his neighbor. Greed is clearly sinful (Romans 1:29; Ephesians 5:3). Yeshua called for contentment (Luke 3:14) and warned, “guard against every form of greed” (Lk 12:15).206 After a month of quail, those surviving were probably longing for manna.

ADONAI had warned Isra’el that the way they treated their daily manna would be a test of their obedience to His Word (Exodus 16:4; Deuteronomy 8:3). By rejecting the manna, Isra’el was really rejecting the LORD (11:20), and it was this rebellious attitude that invited the judgment of Ha’Shem. This reminds us that the way we treat God’s Word is the way we treat the Lord Himself. To ignore the Word, treat it carelessly, or willingly disobey it is to ask for the discipline of God (see the commentary on Hebrews CzGod Disciplines His Children). Instead of feeding the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life that bring death (First John 2:15-17), we need to cultivate an appetite for the holy Word of God (Job 23:12; Psalm 1:1; Jeremiah 15:16; Matthew 4:4; Luke 10:38-42; First Peter 2:1-3).207

In our lives we often experience the same dynamic. We find ourselves punished with abundance. Abundance is not always a blessing. Materialism and greed are quick to follow. A culture with too much food eats too much and becomes obese and insensitive. A family with too much income begins to spend foolishly and finds it increasingly difficult to give the same proportion of work to the Kingdom of God. It is far easier to labor for the Kingdom when things are lean. It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God (Mt 19:24). The Master tells us that instead of seeking to store up treasure on earth (see the commentary on the Life of Solomon BvSolomon’s Treasure), we are to merely ask for our daily bread. That is to say, we should be asking that the Lord provide for us according to His measure of good purpose, even as He provided bread from heaven for Isra’el while they were in the wilderness.208

No doubt terrified from their experience, the people moved from Kibroth-Hattaavah to Hatzerot (11:35). Moses had been given assistance from the seventy elders, and we think perhaps they will be able to help Moshe keep the community on track and avoid any further rebellions. Or at least the rebellions would be confined to the outer fringes of the camp. That hope is soon dashed as we move to Numbers 12.209

Dear Heavenly Father, Praise You that when I focus on eternity, there is great peace and joy. Life on earth will always be full of problems and trials, but the problems will soon be over. It is so much better to focus on Your awesome characteristics and Your unending love, than to mull over hard and painful times. Thank You so much for turning around the pain of hard times to bring eternal joy when I face the problems with a Godly attitude. Thank You that You both redeemed me from Satan’s grip and You bless me with rewards for my heart attitudes! For no one can lay any other foundation than what is already laid – which is Yeshua the Messiah.  Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, each one’s work will become clear. For the Day will show it, because it is to be revealed by fire; and the fire itself will test each one’s work – what sort it is.  If anyone’s work built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward (First Corinthians 3:11-14)

The coming glory of heaven will be so great. I cannot even begin to imagine how wonderful heaven will be. So, I choose to turn from complaints to praising You, my Great Savior. Things no eye has seen and no ear has heard, that have not entered the heart of mankind- these things God has prepared for those who love Him (First Corinthians 2:9). When hard times come, I will choose to bless and praise You for my wonderful redemption. In the power of Yeshua Messiah’s holy Name and Mighty Resurrection. Amen

2024-08-08T22:25:34+00:000 Comments

Bs – Moses’ Complaint about the People 11: 10-15

Moses’ Complaint about the People
11: 10-15

Moses’ complaint about the People DIG: Why do you think the people’s attitude changed between 9:15-23 and 10:11-36? Why do you think their attitude deteriorated so rapidly? Why did Moshe become discouraged? Did Moshe consider their complaints valid? Would you? Why or why not? How does Moses display lack of faith here? In his despair and frustration, what did he ask ADONAI to do?

REFLECT: When are you, like Moshe, most likely to become discouraged with your lot in life? When discouraged, do you listen more to people’s complaints, to God’s provision, or inner doubts? Ask the LORD to forgive you for the times when you have complained about His purpose for your life. Ask God to teach you to be more content with what He has provided. What complaints damage your fellowship with God?

The burden of leadership.

Anyone who has served any length of time leading a congregation of God’s people is familiar with the frustration Moshe feels as he cries out to ADONAI. Even when things are going well, and there are no real crisis situations, and the leadership is well-liked, discontentment can begin to seep in and spread throughout the congregation. It is the way of human beings born with the disease of sin. We do not need legitimate complaints; we will always find something to complain about. This is true for any leader in a position of responsibility over a business, political, or social organization. But it is far more stressful and painful for leaders placed over a congregation because issues of spirituality, faith and relationship inevitably become entangled with discord.

As people of the Torah, we should learn from the book of Numbers. If Moshe was so distressed with leadership responsibilities that he felt suicidal, how much more so our congregational leaders. We need to take a cue from this. We need to become proactive about defending our leadership and silencing the voices of discontentment and antagonism which so quickly spread throughout the congregation. We need to encourage our congregational leaders and stand by them, even if they do turn out to be merely human beings and make mistakes like the rest of us.188 Moshe heard the people crying, family after family, each person at the entrance to his tent (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click GyMoses and the Tent of Meeting); the anger of ADONAI flared up violently; and in mirroring the feelings of YHVH, in the eyes of Moses it was evil (11:10). This brought pressure on Moshe, and depressed, he asked God:

Here is an example of introversion in a speech (see Ac Numbers from a Messianic Jewish Perspective: Chiasm and introversion). This structure clearly shows that although Moses’ complaint seemingly stresses his need for assistance in administration (ABC and CBA), his main concern is expressed in the pivot (D), where his whining discloses his questioning whether God will enable him to provide Isra’el with meat.189

A. Why are you treating your servant so badly (11:11a)? Moshe’s selfless concern for his people had apparently evaporated. Instead of turning to the LORD to ask that he might understand the substance of their complaint, Moses turned to the LORD to ask why he was given such an ungrateful people to lead. There is a human touch in all of this; Moshe is caught off guard, as it were – ill-prepared for the magnitude of the problem he faced in leading such a sinful group of people.190

B. Why haven’t I found favor in your sight, so that you put the burden of this entire people (rather than my people) on me (11:11b)? In other words, if You really love me, You wouldn’t burden me with these people. Knowing, as we do, how ungrateful and hardheaded the people of Isra’el were, it is amazing that Moses wasn’t discouraged more often!191

C. Did I conceive all these people (12:a)? Was I their father, so that You should say to me, “Carry them in your arms, like a nurse carrying a baby, to the land you swore to their ancestors?” The Hebrew emphasizes the “I,” that is, “I am not the father of these people – but, God, You are! After all, it is YHVH who has conceived these people. It was He who gave them birth. He was their nurse, their mother in the wilderness. He has promised them their Land. The people were screaming at Moses; but, ultimately, they were ranting against God.192

D. Where am I going to get meat to give to all the people? Because they keep pestering me with their crying and saying, “Give us meat to eat” (11:13)! Moses does not justify the murmuring of the people, and was doubtless conscious of their sinfulness. At the same time, however, he displays a spirit of discouragement to the point of despair, at God’s dealings with himself; and appears to treat the demand of the Israelites for meat as not being altogether unreasonable.

C. I can’t carry this entire people by myself alone – it’s too much for me (11:14)! The problem is that Moses feels alone in his responsibility, which weighs heavily on his shoulders. The stress pushes him over the edge. Moses lost his perspective and got his eyes off the LORD and onto himself, something that’s easy to do in the difficult experiences in life.193

B. Finally, in resignation, he declares: If you are going to treat me this way, then just kill me outright (11:15a)! Moses’ despair concerning his life’s lot parallels those of other notables in Isra’el’s history. Job cursed the very day of his birth in the midst of his season of suffering (Job 3:1-4); after Elijah put the prophets of Ba’al to the sword, he became very depressed and wanted ADONAI to take his life (First Kings 19:3-4); and Jeremiah likewise bemoaned his birth in the midst of the shame he experienced in being beaten and imprisoned by Pashur in Jerusalem (20:14-18)! At this point in his leadership ministry, Moshe faced a crisis of faith and dependency, preferring death as a favor from God rather than continue to have the responsibility of directing such a rebellious people.

Notice how Moses argues with YHVH. You will recall that, after the golden calf incident (see the commentary on Exodus GqThe Golden Calf Incident), Moshe argued for covenant renewal on the basis of the favor he had found with YHVH. Moses had prayed: Now if I have found favor in Your sight, ADONAI, I pray, let the LORD go along in our midst, even though the people are so obstinate, and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us as Your possession (Exodus 34:9). Now, however, in his despair, he argues against having to lead the people any further, and distances himself from the Israelites.

A. Please, if you have any mercy toward me! – and don’t let me go on being this miserable (11:15b)! This makes this whole passage an outpouring of Moshe’s self-pity, climaxed by this final remark. Since Ha’Shem is the author of Moses’ wretchedness, He might as well finish the job – and take his life. ADONAI responded with grace and yet also with judgment (see BtADONAI’s Response). Moses would get some relief, but in the long run this was just the beginning of troublesome years to come.194

Dear Heavenly Father, Praise You that the number of troublesome years on earth will soon be over and there will be an eternity of peace and joy for all who love You. We all long for good times with family and respect from our work, but sometimes that does not happen. We need to keep in mind that a relationship of love with You is so much better than anything life can offer and your love lasts for all eternity. Day to day problems and personal conflicts sometimes seem to weigh us down, but there is way so much better than complaining to solve the problems. I thank You that as I pray, asking You to give me wisdom, my heart is lifted. I praise You for Your loving care in my life. It is so much better for me to appreciate You than to complain. Prayer is the first thing to do when a problem comes. How wonderful that You listen to my prayers and promise to answer me (John 5:14-15)! I love You Father God and delight in praising You for Your awesome love and indwelling presence in my life (John 14:23) – even when times are hard. You are worthy of all our love and praise! I look forward to praising You thru All eternity! In Messiah Yeshua’s holy Name and power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-08T22:27:46+00:000 Comments

Br – Quail and Manna from ADONAI 11: 4-9

Quail and Manna from ADONAI
11: 4-9

Quail and manna from ADONAI DIG: Who were the rabble? Were there any believers among them? What was the real reason for their complaining? How does complaining show our lack of trust in God and His purposes? What is the attitude of the Israelites in this chapter compared to Exodus 16? Have you ever complained about God’s purpose for your life?

REFLECT: Slowly, the people had become so accustomed to the miracles of ADONAI in their lives that they began to take Him for granted. Does that sound familiar? The Israelites’ long journey is so much like ours. Sometimes, too much like ours! Thank the Lord that He knows what is best for us and provides us with all we need to accomplish His purposes.

A second rebellion.

The rabble with them had an intense desire for meat (11:4a). This account appropriately begins with the rabble (Hebrew: ‘asafsuf, sometime translated riffraff, appears only here in the TaNaKh), an appropriate term for the Gentiles who followed the Hebrews out of Egypt (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click CaAt the End of the 430 Years, to the Very Day). This term points to a recurring source of complaints and trouble in the camp (see Bp – Complaining at Tav’erah). Those who did not know YHVH and His mercies too easily incited those who did know Him to rebel against Him. But, however the complaining began, it soon spread throughout the camp of Isra’el. It only takes a little sin to leaven the whole lump (First Corinthians (5:6-7). It is likely that familiar texts on the need for separation from people who do not share biblical faith have their genesis in this account. We can see this in the Torah (see the commentary on Deuteronomy Dy – Israelite Distinctiveness), and also in the B’rit Chadashah (see Second Corinthians BiDo Not be Unequally Yoked with Unbelievers). Yet, not all the people termed rabble (or who began as rabble) were unbelievers! That is, we may expect that many Gentiles would have come to faith in God in view of their daily contact with Hebrews who did believe (Exodus 14:30-31). Among the non-Hebrew people we may presume had come to faith in Ha’Shem was the Kushite (African) wife of Moshe (Numbers 12:1-2).

Whatever their origin, the rabble caused Moshe and the people of Isra’el a great deal of trouble. A similar group is creating problems for us today. In the parable of the wheat and the weeds (see the commentary on The Life of Christ Ev – The Parable of the Wheat and the Weeds), Yeshua taught that whenever ADONAI plants His true children, the Adversary comes along and plants counterfeits. Satan is an imitator and an infiltrator (Jude 4:2; Second Peter 2:1-2), which explains why Paul warned the Church about some who pretended to be believers (see the commentary on Galatians AxFalse Brothers slipped in to Spy Out our Freedom in Messiah), are false ministers (see the commentary on Second Corinthians BzServants of Satan) and practice a false Gospel (see Galatians AjNo Other Gospel).181

How did their complaining lead to rebellion? They complained about the lack of meat. The quail provided in Exodus 16 had apparently been a one-time treat. But their complaining eventually spread to the Israelites, who started wailing and joined in and declared: If only we had meat to eat! First, we suspect that meat wasn’t common food of the slaves in Egypt; secondly, it wasn’t true that they had no meat to eat. They had both flocks and herds. In Exodus 12:38 we learn that a mixed multitude also went up with the Israelites, with a great number of both flocks and herds. When they arrived in the Land forty years later, they still had flocks and herds because Numbers 32:1 tells us that the descendants of Reuben and the descendants of Gad had vast quantities of livestock. So, the question remains, what were they complaining about?

Then, they changed their minds and wanted fish. We remember the fish we ate in Egypt at no cost. Let’s see . . . fish in the wilderness! It seems that the riffraff was so miserable that they were just making stuff up to complain about. But when the Israelites joined in with the rabble in their complaining, the Hebrews forgot the very reason they left Egypt. They were slaves only a year ago! The Egyptians made their lives bitter with hard labor – digging clay, making bricks, all kinds of field work; and in all the toil they were shown no mercy (Exodus 1:14). How did they go from being shown no mercy to cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic (11:4-5)? They were romanticizing the past because “the-good-old-days” were really “the-bad-old-days.” This is where the heart of mankind leads to when God is absent, never being grateful for what they had. Always wanting more. Just as a circle can never fill a triangle, so that heart of greed is never satisfied.

We need the Ruach Ha’Kodesh to lead us.

But then, like petulant children, they said: We have lost our appetite; we never see anything but this manna (11:6). After all their complaining, they didn’t want to eat anymore. What was the real issue? Verse 4 tells us that the rabble with them had greedy desires. This was beyond food, which they used as an excuse, because they could not have been hungry. Like Eve, who had all the fruits of the Garden except one, the riffraff had convinced themselves that ADONAI was withholding good things from them. So, in the end, their complaining was actually telling God that His provision did not measure up to their desires. A complaining tongue reveals an ungrateful heart. We are to be like Paul when from prison he said: I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances (Phil 4:11). He understood that everything he had was from God.182

Numerous naturalistic explanations have been given to the account for the provision of manna by those who have traveled in the Sinai. Some point to a secretion of the tamarisk tree of small, yellow/white balls that have a sweet taste. Others believe this secretion is not the product of the tree but is the excreta of certain scale insects made on the leaves of these trees during June in some areas of the Sinai. But like the Flood (see Genesis Cj The Waters Rose and the Ark Floated on the Surface of the Water), there are no naturally occurring events that fit the plain reading of the text.183 The miracle was that the manna was found in such giant quantities. To feed two million people, they would have needed about nine million pounds of manna per day; that equals about forty-five hundred tons per year, or about a million tons annually for forty years. All very remarkably scheduled every morning! So any natural cause would seem to be quite a stretch.184

The Spirit of God then defended the manna by telling us how marvelous it was. Manna was the perfect food. Even without the rabbi’s descriptive embellishments, there was food provided directly from heaven. It was like coriander seed and looked like resin. The people went around gathering it, and then ground it in a hand mill or crushed it in a mortar. It was not boring! They could cook it in a pot or make it into loaves. And it tasted like something made with olive oil. In Exodus 16:31 the taste of manna cakes was also compared to honey. When the dew settled on the camp at night, the manna also came down (11:7-9). According to the rabbis, the dew coated the manna, the bottom layer protecting it from the sand while the top layer protected it from being eaten by insects and flies. The manna appeared in the early morning, blown in from the heavens during the night so that enough could be gathered for the daily consumption. Yet, the Israelites had begun to long for foods they once knew. In fact, there was nothing wrong with the manna except that it wasn’t meat, fish, cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic! Because manna was not what they desired, they rejected it, even though it was given to them by God.185

Manna as bread from heaven points to the coming of Jesus as the true bread from heaven, the bread of God, and the living bread that came down from heaven (John 6:32-33 and 51), all in a spiritual sense (John 6:63). Yeshua, as both the bread of life (John 6:35 and 48) and the source of the water of life (Revelation 21:6, 22:1 and 17), can therefore say to us: He who comes to Me will never go hungry, and he who believes in Me will never be thirsty (John 6:35). However, Messiah made a clear distinction between manna and Himself when he said: Our forefathers ate manna and died, but he who feeds on this bread will live forever (John 6:58). We will live forever when we believe in Him (John 6:40).186

Therefore, manna is a type of Messiah: The Sh’khinah glory was connected with the giving of the manna (John 1:14); it came down from heaven (Ephesians 4:10), it was a free gift from God (John 3:16), the manna was sent to Isra’el (Matthew 15:24), people had to gather their own manna, it was to be a personal experience (John 1:12), they were to be fed daily from it (Psalm 69:19); the manna was despised by those who were not God’s children (Numbers 11:4-6; Revelation 16:8-11), manna did not decay on the Sabbath day (Psalm 16:8-10), and it is now hidden, something you see but you don’t understand (Revelation 2:17).187

Dear Heavenly Father, praise You for always being such a gracious giver! You gave the gift so that people might have a life full of abundant joy.  I have come that they might have life, and have it abundantly (John 10:10c)! Just as it was a personal experience to gather the manna, so salvation is a personal experience of being united to Messiah faith For, if you confess with your mouth that Yeshua is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart it is believed for righteousness, and with the mouth it is confessed for salvation (Romans 10:9-10).

You so graciously choose the path of salvation to be made holy by being in Messiah. He chose us in the Messiah before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless before him in love (Ephesian 1:4). The blood of Messiah removes trespasses. In Him we have redemption through His blood – the removal of trespasses – in keeping with the richness of His grace (Ephesian 1:7). All who love You, You promise to make holy by their being in Messiah. Your desire is to save people from hell, but it is a personal choice, just as gathering manna was a personal choice. Making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth. (Ephesians 1:9-10).

What an absolutely wonderful gift You gave to deliver me from sin’s awful penalty of death by Messiah’s painful death, and then to transfer all of Messiah’s righteousness to my spiritual bank account so I could come and live with You in heaven.  He made the One who knew no sin to become a sin offering on our behalf, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God (Second Corinthians 5:21).

What a costly and loving gift You chose to give, knowing how much pain and shame it would cost You! You are so worthy of all my love! It may cost me a little to live for You in this world, but it is far worth the cost so that we may spend all eternity in heaven with You! For I consider the sufferings of this present time not worthy to be compared with the coming glory to be revealed to us (Romans 8:18). I fix my eyes on pleasing You in all we do, say and think. I have an audience of One! Trials and problems will come, but my heart will be fixed on doing Your will. You are my wonderful and loving Father, and the gracious gift-giver of eternal life! In Messiah Yeshua’s holy Name and power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-07T21:41:23+00:000 Comments

Bq – Graves of Greediness 11: 4-35

Graves of Greediness
11: 4-35

We observe with sadness that the memory of the cause of the burning at Tav’erah (to see link click Bp Complaining at Tav’erah) seems to have been lost quickly. It was followed directly by another, even more serious attack on God’s mercy in the people’s rejection of manna, the bread of heaven. It is possible that there was a considerable lapse of time between the complaining that led to the burning (11:1-3) and the complaining that led to the plague of quail (11:4-35), but the placement of these stories in abrupt linking suggests that the time lapse was insignificant. It seems that this new rebellion transpired during the next stop along the march.

There is symmetry in these narratives of rebellion in the TaNaKh. The scream for “real food” rather than the divine provision of manna takes us back to the initial complaint about food in Exodus (see the commentary on Exodus CqIf Only We Had Died by the LORD’s Hand in Egypt), where God began to provide His people with the wonder of manna; it also carries us forward to the last rebellion about food near the end of the generation in the wilderness, where the people rejected the manna as detestable, only to be forced to focus on the image that was truly detestable, the serpent (see Di – The Healing Snake), who was their only means of escape from God’s plague.

Indeed, ADONAI’s provision of food for His people (and their common actions of ingratitude for His mercy) is one of the dominant motifs in the Bible. This began in the Garden of Eden teeming with all kinds of food (Genesis 2); eating the forbidden food led to expulsion from Paradise (Genesis 3). And the Bible ends with a great banquet (see the commentary on Revelation Fg Blessed Are Those Invited to the Wedding Feast of the Lamb). Along the way, on the journey from the paradise of Eden to the Wedding Feast of the Lamb, the provision of food is a mark of God’s love and care for His people. He provides food for those who fear Him; He remembers His covenant forever (Psalm 111:5). But there is more to eating than food for the stomach. This is why we must bless God (Psalm 103:1-2), especially at meal times. Eating a satisfying meal provides the believer a wonderful reason to praise YHVH, who gives good gifts (Deuteronomy 8:10). Similarly, to blame God for a shortage of food, or for a lack of variety, is a cowardly act of irreverence. So, here, we learn the story of the graves of greediness in 11:4-35.180

These verses are displayed in a chiastic fashion (see Ac Numbers from a Messianic Jewish Perspective: Chiasm and Introversion). The inverted symmetry of this section of Scripture is clear. ADONAI punishes the people’s complaint (AA) and that of Moses (BB). In c, the divine reply of condemnation to both complaints, is pivotal, anticipating the punishment. Moshe’s panicky outburst bordering on heresy, is the main point.

A. The people’s complaint: meat (11:4-9)

B. Moses’ complaint: assistance (11:10-15)

C. ADONAI’S response to both complaints (11:16-23)

a. ADONAI’s response: superficially positive (11:16-20)

c. Moses’ response: lack of faith (11:21-22)

b. ADONAI’s response: restrained (11:23)

B. ADONAI assisted Moses by authorizing the elders (11:24-30)

A. ADONAI judged the people by supplying meat (11:31-34)

From Kivrot Ha’Ta’avah the people traveled to Harzerot, and they stayed there (11:35)

2024-08-07T10:34:18+00:000 Comments

Bp – Complaining at Tav’erah 11: 1-3

Complaining at Tav’erah
11: 1-3

Complaining at Tav’erah DIG: Why are the Israelites complaining here such a shock? How had it become a pattern of destruction? What was the spark that lit the fire? Who were the mixed-multitude? What did they have to complain about? What does the B’rit Chadashah have to say about complaining? What six things does the LORD hate?

REFLECT: What struggles have you had to face in your life since you were saved? What was your response to those struggles? How does complaining show your lack of trust in God and His purposes for your life? Do you think that your complaining stumbles unbelievers who know about your faith? Why? Why not? Who puts out your fires today?

The first rebellion became a pattern of destruction.

There is a cyclical nature to Isra’el’s rebellions against God – stubborn people tend to repeat the sins of the past. The first rebellion of the redeemed people came on the third day of the march from Egypt to Mount Sinai after their miraculous crossing of the Sea of Reeds (see the commentary on Exodus, to see link click CnWhen They Came to Marah the Water was Bitter). Now, three days out on their triumphal march to Canaan from Mount Sinai, they fell back into their complaining behavior. Nothing in the first ten chapters of Numbers has prepared us for this verse; rather, those chapters have emphasized over and over again the complete obedience of Moses and the people to the dictates of YHVH. Moses, the narrator of Numbers, has arranged his materials so carefully that this sudden outbreak of renewed pettiness against God seems unprecedented, unexpected – unbelievable. How, we wonder, with all the preparation for a holy walk, could there come such stumbling so soon?174

Now the people became like those who complain of adversity (Hebrew: ra, meaning evil, distress, misery or calamity) in the hearing of ADONAI (11:1a). Here we have the first act of rebellion on the journey from Mount Sinai. God’s Word tells us that there was a group of complainers on the outskirts of the camp, and this revolt took little to reveal itself. And the complainers, Egyptians who left with the Israelites, were mixed in among the people. Complaining was, and is, contagious and the Israelites fell into that trap. Only a spark is needed to start a fire, you need only a few people to start complaining to start a rebellion.

God’s people had lost sight of what He had done for them already. He had set them free from the bondage of Egypt and the cruelties of that nation toward them. He had opened the hearts and hands of the people of Egypt to bless them with much wealth as they left, so they could build the Tabernacle at Sinai. He had given them victory over Pharaoh’s army. He had opened the Sea of Reeds for them so they could walk across on dry ground. He had placed His Presence among them and led them personally, step-by-step, through the desert. He provided them with food to eat every day so that they were not hungry. But now, Isra’el was complaining about ADONAI. They had failed to appreciate what He had already done for them.175

The B’rit Chadashah has much to say about this problem for it never disappeared. The heart of mankind has not changed since the time of Adam (see the commentary on Romans BmThe Consequences of Adam). For this reason, Paul urges us not to complain, as some did, and they were destroyed by the Destroying Angel. Now these things happened to them as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come (First Corinthians 10:10-11). Paul learned to find contentment and joy in the Lord rather than in his external circumstances. I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am (Philippians 4:11). That is why, for Messiah’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong (Second Corinthians 12:10). To Timothy, he confided that godliness with contentment is great gain (First Timothy 6:6). As the people of God, we must learn from the mistakes of the generation in the wilderness and commit ourselves not to repeat them. We must put aside our complaining spirits and learn the art of gratitude.176

Based upon the stories of the book of Numbers, it would appear that few things irritate Ha’Shem more than a negative attitude. There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict among brothers (Proverbs 6:16-19). Thus, when ADONAI heard it, His anger flared up, so that fire from ADONAI broke out against them and consumed the outskirts of the camp (11:1b). In God’s mercy, it did not affect Moses, Aaron, the priests, the Levites, nor the Tabernacle. Now the exact nature of the judgment is unclear, but it obviously caused a severe burning of some kind.

In the midst of His wrath YHVH remembered His mercy. Then the people cried out to Moshe, Moshe prayed to ADONAI, and the fire stopped (11:2). This is one of the ongoing themes of Scripture and thus emphasized in Numbers. The people truly deserved God’s considerable wrath. But the survivors of this outburst of His anger cried out to Moses for help on their behalf before the LORD. Moshe prayed and the fire subsequently subsided.177 If Moshe had not been there, the fire would not have stopped. And Moshe is not here today, so how are our fires stopped? This is the type of question this chapter will ask of us, and it will point to the One Mediator who speaks to God on our behalf: Yeshua Messiah.

Because of the raging fire of Ha’Shem, the people named that place of awful memory Tav‘erah [burning, like hell] because ADONAI’s fire broke out against them (11:3). Two similar stories immediately follow this parashah (see the commentary on Deuteronomy AfParashah). The rejection of the Promised Land (see ByThe Report of the Spies), and Korah’s rebellion (see CoThe Rebellion of Korah) are also based upon the same pattern as we see here.178

Therefore, the unspecified complaint in Numbers 11:1-3 becomes a basic outline for the complaint stories that follow: The people complain; God’s anger is kindled; Moses intercedes; and the punishment is stopped. Ha’Shem’s anger here is hot, and the punishment was in the form of fire that broke out against them (11:1). But the fire only consumed the outskirts of the camp. Moshe prayed to ADONAI on behalf of the people and the fire stopped. The name of the place was then called Tav’erah, which in Hebrew means burning. At this point in the narrative the reader may wonder if this is only a minor, temporary, setback, since the fire only torches the fringes of the camp. Perhaps there will be a return to the blissful obedience that was the theme in Numbers 1-10. Well, we do not have to wait long to find out that such an optimistic scenario is not in the works; we quickly arrive on the heels of another story of rebellion (see BrQuail and Manna from ADONAI).179

Even when life seems all messed up and not going the way we had hoped, You are still the wise and loving Almighty Sovereign of the world who holds the keys to eternal life in heaven. We need to remember that our time on this earth is actually only for a blink of time compared to eternity. When we leave earth, all will have an eternal existence, because of our faith in You. We praise You for opening heaven’s door to those who love You by Your gift of Messiah’s righteousness (Second Corinthians 5:21). There are never any complaints in heaven; and on earth, we choose to praise You – even when it is hard for You are worthy. This life will be over soon and then heaven will be for all eternity! I will love You forever in Messiah Yeshua’s holy Name and power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-27T19:17:39+00:000 Comments

Bo – The Abrupt Slide into Rebellion Chapters 11 to 20

The Abrupt Slide into Rebellion
Chapters 11 to 20

The first ten chapters of Numbers could be called the Book of Obedience. We read phrases like: Thus, the children of Isra’el did all that ADONAI commanded. But, Numbers 11 marks a dramatic shift from the positive tone of the first ten chapters. There, the people looked forward to the Promised Land and the Israelites were assured of God’s care and protection (10:29). Numbers 11:1-3 recounts the first instance of the people’s discontent and complaining against YHVH in the book so far. But the motif of the people’s complaining to Moshe and God in the wilderness is not new; a number of complaint or murmuring stories occur in the book of Exodus before the giving of the Ten Words (see the commentary on Deuteronomy, to see link click BkThe Ten Words) and the covenant at Mount Sinai, and before the golden calf incident. Yet, the complaints that Isra’el made in Exodus are treated as legitimate needs: the people needed water (Exodus 15:22-26), the people needed food (Exodus 16), and the people again needed water (Exodus 17:1-7). In each case, God took their complaints seriously and fulfilled the needs of the Israelites by turning bitter water into sweet water, by providing manna and quail for food, and by causing water to flow from a rock.

In the book of Numbers, however, the Israelites raise their voices in complaint about similar needs, but here things turn out differently. The complaints are treated as acts of unfaithfulness. The whining of the Israelites rouses Ha’Shem’s anger and punishment, which is mitigated only by Moses’ aggressive intercession. The contrasts between the parallel sets of narratives before Sinai in Exodus and after Sinai in Numbers raises the obvious questions that beg to be answered. What happened in the interim that caused this shift from divine accommodation in Exodus 15-18 to divine punishment in Numbers 11-20? What happened in between is that ADONAI had established a covenant with Isra’el at Mount Sinai.

Before Sinai, Isra’el was like a newly adopted child who did not yet know the rules of the household. Thus, God, the divine Parent, bent over backwards to satisfy the legitimate needs of Isra’el immediately out of Egypt. But by the time we reach Numbers, the Israelites knew their responsibilities in the commandments and were answerable for its relationship to YHVH. Moreover, Isra’el had already rejected the LORD once in the dramatic golden calf incident in Exodus 32. God nearly abandoned Isra’el then. His powerful and holy presence in the midst of sinful Isra’el was a divine concession to Moshe’s urgent pleas in Exodus 32-34. But the holiness of ADONAI cannot tolerate unfaithfulness and rebellion without deadly consequences for Isra’el as a people. Isra’el knew the commandments and was accountable for it, beginning with the first and most important of the Ten Words: You shall have no other gods before Me.

Throughout Numbers 11-20, God’s people continually rebel, and He punishes them with plagues and military defeats. The LORD offers signs of forgiveness and compassion, but the people in each case resume their rebellious ways. First, there is the general rebellion of the people in Numbers 11. Next, in Numbers 12, there is a rebellion for the first time in the wilderness by two leaders of the people. This is followed in Numbers 13-14 by the most serious revolt against YHVH – the spy mission into the Promised Land. The spy story defines the central theme and structure of the entire book of Numbers as a tale of the death of the Exodus generation and the birth of a new generation of hope on the edge of the Promised Land. After a word of hope is offered in Ch 15, the people, and even the Levites, resume the cycle of revolts and disobedience. The spirit of rebellion and unfaithfulness extended even to Aaron and Moses in the narrative of Chapter 20. The death of Aaron the high priest and the succession of his son Eleazar as the new high priest in Numbers 20:22-29 is a precursor to the end of the entire Exodus generation, and the dawning of an entirely new generation of hope.173

2024-08-04T09:31:55+00:000 Comments

Bn – Leaving Sinai 10: 11-36

Leaving Sinai
10: 11-36

Leaving Sinai DIG: As the Israelites begin their journey from Sinai to the Promised Land, what impressions do you get about the journey from this passage? Who’s in charge? How well do they mobilize the people for this trip? Despite such preparations, what problems are they likely to encounter in the wilderness?

REFLECT: Isra’el had been comfortable at Sinai, but God soon said to move on. In what area of your life are you comfortable, but you sense God is telling you to move on? What adventure has God prepared and mobilized you to do? How have you prepared for this? What problems do you anticipate?

Let the march begin.

Newlyweds spent a year together before going to war (Deuteronomy 24:5), so Isra’el remained at Mount Sinai for nearly twelve months. They arrived there in the third month after their deliverance from Egypt (Exodus 19:1), and it was now the second month of the second year. During that time, the Torah had been announced and the Tabernacle had been constructed and dedicated. Moshe had also dedicated the priests and the Levites, counted the soldiers, and organized the tribes. Isra’el was now a nation ready for action.164

Throughout these early chapters of Numbers there is a topical presentation rather than a chronological arrangement of the material. They have been telling us the story of the Israelite’s preparations to leave Mount Sinai. In the first four chapters of Numbers, they took a census (to see link click AnThe Levitical Census) and assigned the Levites to their various tasks (see ArThe Four Camps of Levites). Numbers 7-10 is a flashback and relates how Isra’el was ready to depart from Mount Sinai. Chapters 9 and 10 tell of the final preparation before the departure from Sinai as a flashback on the twentieth of the second month of the second year (10:11); the observance of the second Passover six days earlier (9:1-14); the pillar of cloud and fire as a guide (9:15-23); the trumpet signals for assembling the people and its leaders and for breaking camp (10:1-10); the order of march (10:11-28), and a narrative relating a different marching order (10:29-36).165

These verses describe the actual inauguration of Isra’el’s march and the events of the first three days. The holy camp of God’s people sets out for the first time in the wilderness of Sinai to the wilderness of Paran. The first three days of the journey go smoothly and without incident. All seems to be moving according to God’s plan and desire. But, the favorable impression will linger only for a short time, ending abruptly when we come to Chapter 11.166

The march begins (10:11-13): The silver trumpets (see BlTwo Silver Trumpets) were meant to create a sense of awe and splendor, like the court of a great king. In fact, as the children of Isra’el finally broke camp and left Mount Sinai, the entire scene is layered in dramatic pomp and pageantry. The fire-cloud (see BkThe Pillar of Cloud and Fire), the silver trumpets, the camps, the banners were all intended to evoke images of the great and regal procession of a royal host. We are meant to imagine the Sh’khinah glory , a fire by night, a pillar of cloud by day, rising from the Tabernacle. We are meant to hear the staccato blasts of the silver trumpets, clear and inspiring, like the fanfare of a king. We are meant to imagine each camp breaking and setting out in order, each beneath its own splendid, tribal banner. On the twentieth day of the second month of the second year since the Exodus, five days after the Second Passover (see BiPesach in the Wilderness). So, they had been at Mount Sinai for eleven months and twenty days. The fire-cloud was taken up from over the Tabernacle. Here we have the first movement of the Sh’khinah glory since it had come over the Tabernacle in Exodus 40 (see the commentary on Exodus HhThe Glory of the LORD Filled the Tabernacle). And the people of Isra’el moved out in stages from the Sinai Desert. The fire-cloud stopped in the Paran Desert, at the border of the Promised Land, as we will see later in 12:16. So, they set out on their first journey, in keeping with ADONAI’s order through Moshe. As they set out, they moved as the army of ADONAI.167

The grand procession of tribes and Levites (10:14-28): In the lead was Moshe, Aaron and the priests, and the banner of the camp of the descendants of Judah, whose companies moved forward; over his company was Nachshon the son of ‘Amminadav (see AmThe Camp of the Twelve Tribes of Isra’el). Over the company of the tribe of the descendants of Issachar was Nethan’el the son of Tzu‘ar. Over the company of the descendants of Zebulun was Eli’av the son of Helon (10:14-16).

Then the Tabernacle was taken down; and the descendants of Gershon (see AuThe Clan of Gershon) and the descendants of Merari (see AvThe Clan of Merari) set out, carrying the Tabernacle (10:17). When the fire-cloud stopped, they would have time to set up the Tabernacle so that the Kohathites could set the holy things in it.

Next, the banner of the camp of Reuben moved forward by companies; over his company was Elitzur the son of Sh’de’ur. Over the company of the tribe of the descendants of Simeon was Shlumi’el the son of Tzurishaddai. Over the company of the descendants of Gad was Elyasaf the son of De‘u’el (10:18-20).

Then the Kohathits set out (see AtThe Clan of Kohath), carrying the holy objects so that [at the next camp] the Tabernacle would already be set up before the Kohathites arrived to set up the holy objects (10:21).

Next, the banner of the camp of the descendants of Ephraim moved forward by companies; over his company was Elishama the son of ‘Ammihud. Over the company of the tribe of the descendants of Manaseh was Gamli’el the son of P’dahtzur. Over the company of the descendants of Benjamin was Avidan the son of Gid‘oni 10:22-24).

The banner of the camp of the descendants of Dan, forming the rearguard for all the camps, moved forward by companies; over his company was Achi‘ezer the son of ‘Ammishaddai. Over the company of the tribe of the descendants of Asher was Pag‘i’el the son of ‘Okhran. Over the company of the descendants of Naphtali was Achira the son of ‘Enan. Then Moshe gives the summary: This is how the people of Isra’el traveled by companies; thus, they moved forward (10;25-28).

Hobab the Midianite (10:29-32): Here a new person is suddenly introduced. His presence is very instructive because he offers us a solid glimpse of the Gentile in the midst of Isra’el. His name was Hobab. He was Moshe’s brother-in-law (Hebrew: chothen) and the son of Reuel the Midianite (also known as Jethro, which is a title like king or pharaoh, in Exodus 3:1, 4:18). By that time it very well could have been that Jethro could have died, and if so, Habab would have been the patriarch of the Kenite branch of the Midianites. Apparently, after Jethro left for Midian (see the commentary on Exodus CwMoses and Jethro), Hobab had stayed with Moses until the present time. Now although the Sh’khinah glory would lead the people through the wilderness, Hobab with expert knowledge of the wilderness lands of Sinai, would be a significant aid in locating water and pastures in regions unknown to Moshe. As a result, here we have a great example of divine leadership and human wisdom.

Therefore, Moshe said to Hobab, “We are traveling to the place about which ADONAI said: I will give it to you. Come with us, and we will treat you well, because ADONAI has promised good things to Isra’el.” Paul says the same thing in Romans 11 with regard to the olive tree (see the commentary on Romans CzThe Illustration of Isra’el’s Future). Even though the B’rit Chadashah is made with Isra’el, it doesn’t mean that it is only for Isra’el: For Messiah Himself has brought peace to us. He united Jews and Gentiles into one people when, in His own body on the cross, He broke down the wall of hostility that separated us (Ephesians 2:14 NLT). Hence, the New Covenant is not two Covenants, one with Isra’el and one with the Church. It is only one Covenant, but with two “participants,” Isra’el and the Church (see the commentary on Jeremiah EoThe Days are Coming, declares the LORD, When I Will Make a New Covenant with the People of Isra’el: The Church’s Relationship to the B’rit Chadashah). Gentiles are not absorbed into any tribe, in other words, they don’t become Jews (see  Galatians AkThe Hebrew Roots Movement: A Different Gospel).168

But Hobab replied, “I will not go; I would rather go back to my own country (not far from Mount Sinai) and my own kinsmen.” Moshe continued, “Please don’t leave us, because you know that we have to camp in the desert, and you can serve as our guide. If you do go with us, then whatever good ADONAI does for us, we will do the same for you.” In a sense this urging was an act of evangelism. Hobob did not come easily. But subsequent biblical texts indicate that at last, he did come. In that regard, he was just like Ruth, who, leaving all behind, joined Naomi in route to the Promised Land with the promise of something ahead that was of more value than anything left at home. To come with Moses was not just to change Hobob’s address, but to change his family. To come with Moshe was to gain a New Land. To come with Moses was to believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (see  Ruth AnYour People Will Be My People and Your God My God).

Judges 1:16 indicates that Hobab accepted Moses’ requests to be the “eyes” for the Israelites in the wilderness, as his descendants received a share in the Land. But he himself did not share in the Promised Land. Presumably, the sadness of Isra’el’s impending rebellion against ADONAI included Hobab in judgment (see BzFaith and Obedience). He experienced God’s goodness in the same way that the rest of the Israelites did, in the providential care that YHVH gave His erring people in the inhospitable wilderness of their banishment. Hobab must have been an invaluable aide to Moshe. However, the anticipated journey of a few weeks turned out to be a lifetime for him.

The three-day procession behind the Ark (10:33-36): So, they set out from ADONAI’s mountain and traveled for three days. Ahead of them on this three-day journey went the ark of ADONAI’s covenant, searching for a new place to stop. The contradiction with 10:21 and 2:17 is obvious. Probably during the initial stage, the ark did precede the marchers because the people feared the dangers of the wilderness. The Sh’khinah glory of ADONAI was over them during the day as they set out from the camp (10:33-34). Eleven months earlier the people of Isra’el had emerged as a rag-tag group of former slaves, gathered in the wilderness in the first rush of deliverance, but unorganized and unruly. Now they were prepared for the march, the battle, and the anticipated victory.169

The ark of the covenant led them into battle. These words function as a conclusion to the whole passage concerning departure and, in a sense, to the whole Sinai narrative (Exodus 19 to Numbers 10). This passage functions in a way parallel to the Aaronic blessing (see BbThe Aaronic Blessing). Its language is elevated prose at the least with a good deal of parallelism.170

Introductory prose line (five Hebrew words): When the ark moved forward, Moshe made a call for God to rise up and scatter His enemies: Arise, ADONAI! May your enemies be scattered! Let those who hate you flee before you!” This was essentially a war cry. It was as if he was the general shouting on behalf of the Commander-in-Chief to all of His enemies, “Here we come, you better run for your life!”

Introductory prose line (five Hebrew words): When Moses stopped, he called for God to rise up and bless His people: Return, ADONAI of the countless thousands of Isra’el (10:35-36)!171 When “the battle” was finished, the general was able to tell his Commander-in-Chief that because of His brilliantly orchestrated victory, He may now rest peacefully in the victorious camp of His army. The ark going forward at the head of Isra’el’s tribes typified Ha’Shem in front of His people protecting them, helping them, and leading them on to final victory (see the commentary on Deuteronomy AgThe Problem of Holy War in the TaNaKh).

Thus, in these words of Moses we have a shout of victory based solidly on the faithfulness of ADONAI to His covenantal promise to the patriarchs. The people were on their way to Canaan; soon Canaan would be the land of Isra’el, or so they thought, based on these words of high-spirited confidence in YHVH. Significantly, David used these same words of Moshe in the beginning of his triumphal song in Psalm 68.172

Dear Heavenly Father, Praise You for your wisdom in guiding me. Sometimes after being in one place in life for a while, it gets comfortable and I don’t want to move on; but it is very reassuring to know that when You tell me to move, You have already gone ahead of me to prepare the situation and You go with me! All praise and glory to Your gracious presence and guidance of all the details of my life! In Messiah Yeshua holy Name and His power of His resurrection. Amen

2024-08-11T23:20:14+00:000 Comments

Ci – Nisijisifu Kamwe, Isipokuwa katika Msalaba wa Bwana wetu Yeshua  6:14-18

Nisijisifu Kamwe, Isipokuwa katika

Msalaba wa Bwana wetu Yeshua 
6:14-18

CHAMBUA: Je, Wayahudi na Paulo waliuonaje msalaba kwa njia tofauti? Je, ni kwa jinsi gani ulimwengu ulikuwa umesulubishwa kwa Paulo? Kwa nini kutahiriwa wala kutotahiriwa hakukuwa na maana yoyote? Ni nini muhimu? Ni kanuni gani Paulo alitaka makanisa aliyokuwa ameyapanda yafuate? Katika akili ya Paulo, “Israeli wa kweli wa Mungu” ni nani? Je, maneno hayo yamepotoshwaje leo? Paulo alibebaje alama ya Yesu mwilini mwake?

TAFAKARI: Mstari wa 14 unakufurahisha jinsi gani? Je, inakupa changamoto gani? Je, ni katika maeneo gani ya maisha yako unajua shalom ya kuishi kwa injili? Ni katika sehemu gani za maisha yako unapoteza amani hii kwa kuishi kwa ajili ya kupata kibali cha ulimwengu? Ikiwa ungejumlisha ujumbe wa kitabu kizima cha Wagalatia kwa maneno machache, ungesema nini?

Paulo anafunga barua yake kwa maandikisho katika mkono wake mwenyewe na kuanzisha uamuzi wa halachic kwa wanafunzi wake kwa kueleza tofauti kati ya waamini wa kweli wa Kiyahudi, Israeli wa kweli wa Mungu, kinyume na walimu wa Kiyahudi wa uongo, Wayahudi.

Tofauti na waamini wa Kiyahudi waliotukuza mafanikio ya kibinadamu na juhudi binafsi kama njia ya wokovu, Paulo alijivunia msalaba wa Bwana wetu Yeshua Masihi pekee. Kwa waamini wa Kiyahudi msalaba ulikuwa kitu cha aibu; kwa Paulo ilikuwa lengo la utukufu. Walijisifu katika mwili; alijivunia Mwokozi. Kwa njia yake ulimwengu umesulubishwa kwangu, na mimi kwa ulimwengu (6:14). Ulimwengu ambao Paulo anaongelea hapa ni ulimwengu alioujua kabla ya kuokoka, ulimwengu wa Wafilipi 3:4-6, ukoo wake wa Kiyahudi, mapokeo yake ya Kifarisayo, bidii yake ya kushika amri 613 za Moshe, kwa ufupi, ulimwengu. ambayo alikuwa akiishi. Kwa haya yote sasa alikuwa amekufa. Kusulubiwa. Alikuwa ametenganishwa nayo kwa msalaba wa Bwana Yeshua. Haikuwa na mvuto tena kwake wala ushawishi juu yake.180

Ndipo Paulo akatoa sababu ya kujivunia msalaba wa Masihi. Kwa maana kutahiriwa wala kutotahiriwa hakumaanishi kitu – bali kumkubali Yesu Masihi kama Bwana na Mwokozi wetu kwa imani pekee, na hivyo kuwa kiumbe kipya (6:15). Hakuwa akipuuza kuwa Myahudi, wala hakuwa akisema kwamba hakuna kitu kama kuwa Myahudi, wala hakumaanisha kwamba tofauti kati ya Wayahudi na Wamataifa haijalishi, wala hakumaanisha kwamba Israeli haina umuhimu sasa. Lakini ADONAI haonyeshi vipendwa linapokuja suala la kuhukumu nafsi zetu. Kitu pekee ambacho ni muhimu ni kuwa kiumbe kipya. Kwa hiyo, mtu akiwa ndani ya Masihi ni kiumbe kipya. Mambo ya kale yamepita; tazama, yote yamekuwa mapya (Wakorintho wa Pili 5:17).

Kuwa ndani ya Masihi ni kuwa kiumbe kipya. Uumbaji huu mpya unaletwa na Ruach ha-Kodeshi, Wakala wa kuzaliwa upya (Tito 3:5) na Mtoaji wa kuzaliwa kwa kimungu (Yohana 3:3, 6-8). Uumbaji mpya wa Mungu ulianza wakati wa wokovu (tazama maelezo kuhusu Maisha ya Kristo Bw – Mungu Anachotufanyia Wakati wa Imani), na siku moja utatekelezwa kwa kiwango cha ulimwengu mzima ( Ufunuo 21:4-5 ) ) Maisha ya kale ya utumwa wa dhambi na ubinafsi yamepita (Wakorintho wa Pili 5:16; Warumi 6:6-14; Waefeso 4:22; Wakolosai 3:9). Maisha mapya ya kujitolea kwa Masihi yanamaanisha kwamba mtu ana mitazamo mipya na matendo mapya (Wakorintho wa Pili 5:14-15; Warumi 6:4; Waefeso 4:23 hadi 5:2).181

Hukumu hii ilipaswa kuwa halachah kwa makutaniko ya Paulo: Sasa watu wote wanaoishi kwa kanuni hii (Kigiriki: kanon, maana yake kanuni) ya imani katika Masihi – shalom na rehema kwa waamini wa Mataifa ambao wanaelewa injili rahisi ya imani-plus-chochote. na juu ya Waumini wa Kiyahudi walio amini vivyo hivyo, hata Israeli wa kweli wa Mungu (6:16). Kanuni hapa ni msalaba wa Masihi na yote yanayoendana nayo katika B’rit Chadashah, ikijumuisha, bila shaka, huduma ya Ruach ha-Kodesh ambayo ni ushahidi mwingi katika sehemu hii ya mwisho ya Wagalatia. Kwa hiyo, wale ambao hupanga maisha yao kwa uwezo wa Roho, ndio Israeli halisi wa Mungu, wale ambao ni wazao wa kiroho na wa kimwili wa Abrahamu (3:7), na ni warithi wa ahadi badala ya sheria (Wagalatia. 3:18). Hao ndio Wayahudi halisi, Israeli wa kweli wa imani, kama wale wanaorejelewa katika Warumi 2:28-29 na 9:6-7.182

Kwa bahati mbaya, usemi wa Israeli wa Mungu umepotoshwa na theolojia ya Uingizwaji kwamba Kanisa ni Israeli mpya, ambayo imechukua mahali pa Wayahudi, wale wanaoitwa “Israeli ya Kale,” na kwa hiyo sasa si tena mali ya Mungu. watu. Lakini si mstari huu wala sehemu nyingine yoyote ya B’rit Chadashah inayofundisha fundisho hili la uwongo na la kupinga Usemitiki (tazama Ak – The Hebrew Roots Movement: A Different Gospel).

Katika onyo la mwisho, Paulo anasema: Tangu sasa mtu awaye yote asinitaabishe, kwa maana ninayo alama ya yeshua katika mwili wangu (6:17). Neno alama linatokana na neno la Kiyunani stigmata, ambalo lina matumizi mengi. Watumwa katika mahekalu ya Frugia, ambayo Wagalatia waliyafahamu, walihusishwa maishani na huduma ya hekaluni, walipachikwa jina la mungu huyo. Jina lilikuwa stigmata au alama.
Katika siku za Paulo

 

2024-08-03T11:16:16+00:000 Comments

Ch – Autograph: Tazama Barua Kubwa Ninaandika kwa Mkono Wangu Mwenyewe  6:11-13

Autograph: Tazama Barua Kubwa Ninaandika

kwa Mkono Wangu Mwenyewe
6:11-13

CHAMBUA: Kwa nini Paulo aliandika kwa herufi kubwa za inchi? Ni nini msukumo wa uwongo wa wafuasi wa Kiyahudi? Kwa nini wafuasi wa dini ya Kiyahudi walikuwa wakijaribu kuwalazimisha Wasio Wayahudi wa Galatia kutahiriwa? Waumini wa Kiyahudi walikuwa wakifanya nini ili kuzuia mateso yao wenyewe kutoka kwa Sanhedrini na Wayahudi huko Yerusalemu? Je, wao wenyewe walikuwa wanazingatia Torati? Kwa nini walitaka Wamataifa wa Galatia kutahiriwa na kujaribu kushika amri 613 za Moshe?

TAFAKARI: Ni nani unayehitaji kuhutubia kwa herufi kubwa ili waweze kupata uhakika kuhusu Yeshua Masihi? Je, unaweza kuwasilisha tofauti kati ya njia ya utimilifu wa kiungu na njia ya mafanikio ya kibinadamu kwa uwazi kwa asiyeamini? Mara ya mwisho ulifanya hivyo lini? Je, kuna mtu maishani mwako anayejaribu kulazimisha aina fulani ya uhalali kwako? Kitabu hiki cha Wagalatia kinawezaje kukusaidia kuyajibu? Unajivunia nini na nani?

Paulo anamalizia barua yake kwa kujiandikisha kwa mkono wake mwenyewe, ambamo anazungumzia misukumo ya msingi ya Waamini wa Kiyahudi kwa namna ya ustaarabu.

Paulo alikuwa na mazoea ya kuamuru barua zake kwa wengine, lakini kuandika maneno ya kumalizia kwa mwandiko wake mwenyewe na sahihi yake ilitoa uthibitisho kwamba yeye ndiye mwandishi (Wathesalonike wa Pili 3:17; Wathesalonike wa Pili 3:17-18; 1 Wakorintho. 16:21; Wakolosai 4:18). Tertio, kwa mfano, alikuwa katibu aliyeandika barua kwa Warumi kama Paulo alivyomwamuru (Warumi 16:22). Lakini Paulo alijali sana hata Wagalatia walielewa hatari waliyokuwa nayo hata akaiondoa kalamu kutoka kwa mwandishi wake na kuandika: Zingatieni herufi kubwa – ninawaandikia ninyi kwa mkono wangu mwenyewe (6:11).171.

Neno kuhusu barua kubwa ambazo Paulo aliandika. Kulikuwa na mitindo miwili ya uandishi wa Kigiriki, ule wa maandishi ya kifasihi ambao ulijumuisha herufi zenye inchi-juu zilizoundwa moja moja na bila uhusiano wowote na herufi nyingine, na laana, kwa kutumia herufi ndogo zaidi katika kile kinachoweza kuitwa mkono unaokimbia (bila kuinua kalamu kutoka kwenye karatasi), iliyounganishwa pamoja. Kwa kuongezea, kulikuwa na madaraja manne ya uandishi katika mtindo wa miswada katika Karne ya Kwanza. Kwanza, kulikuwa na kazi ya mwandishi mzuri kitaaluma. Pili, kulikuwa na kazi ya mwandishi mzuri wa kawaida. Tatu, kulikuwa na kazi ya mtu mwenye elimu, lakini si mwandishi wa kitaaluma, akiandika nakala ya makini ya mkono unaoendesha. Na nne, kulikuwa na mkono unaoendesha wa maandishi ya kawaida ya kila siku. Paulo alikuwa ameamuru barua zake kwa Tertio, Sosthene, Timotheo na Silvano. Hawa walikuwa watu wenye elimu, lakini si waandishi wa kitaalamu. Kwa hiyo, uandishi wao ungekuwa ule wa mwanariadha aliyesoma, aliyeandikwa kwa laana, yaani, herufi ndogo zilizounganishwa pamoja kwa mkono unaokimbia. Hiyo ina maana kwamba maandishi ya awali ya Paulo yalikuwa katika mtindo wa maandishi ya laana, na sehemu ambayo aliandika kwa mwandiko wake mwenyewe ingekuwa katika herufi za inchi-juu.172

Swali linalofuata ni kwa nini aliandika kwa herufi kubwa za inchi juu. Paul alikuwa amepatwa na ugonjwa wa macho ya mashariki uitwao ophthalmia, ambao sio tu ulimpa mwonekano wa kuchukiza, bali ulimfanya karibu kuwa kipofu kabisa (tazama Bp – Mpaka Masihi Aumbike Ndani Yako). Huu ulikuwa mwiba wa Paulo katika mwili (Wakorintho wa Pili 12:7). Kwa hiyo ilikuwa ni lazima kwake kuandika kwa herufi kubwa za kutosha ili kwa maono yake yenye giza aweze kuona anachoandika. Ruakhi ha-Kodeshi alimwongoza kuongeza maneno haya ya kumalizia ili kutoa tofauti moja zaidi kati ya Wayahudi na waamini waliojazwa na Ruach.

ALIKUWA NA JAMBO MUHIMU LA KUSEMA NA HAKUTAKA WAGALATIA WAKOSE HOJA, KWA HIYO ALIANDIKA KATIKA KAS ZOTE. Utayari wake wa kuandika aya hii yote ya kumalizia (6:11-18) kwa mkono wake mwenyewe bila shaka ingevutia mioyo ya wasomaji wake.173

Baada ya kuashiria mwanzo wa mwisho wa barua hiyo, Paulo aliendelea kuwashutumu waamini wa Kiyahudi (ona Ag – Nani Walikuwa Wayahudi?) ambao walikuwa wakiwachanganya wanafunzi wake kwa kujaribu kuwageuza kutoka kwa injili ya neema ya Paulo, hadi injili iliyobuniwa na mwanadamu, ambayo hakuna injili hata kidogo (1:7 NIV). Njia hizi mbili za wokovu ndizo mbili pekee ambazo wanadamu wamewahi kujua. Njia ya BWANA ni njia ya neema kwa njia ya imani (Waefeso 2:8-9). Mengine yote, haijalishi yanaonekana kuwa tofauti jinsi gani, ni jaribio lisilo na faida la wokovu kupitia matendo ya dhambi ya kibinadamu. Ni kana kwamba, kwenye rafu ya dini za ulimwengu, kulikuwa na mamia ya vifurushi vya kuvutia, vilivyo na anuwai nyingi za maumbo, ukubwa, madai, na bei. Lakini ndani ya yote hayo mna machujo yaleyale yasiyo na ladha, yasiyo na lishe ya matendo ya haki. Kusimama peke yake, kutovutia na kuchukiza kwa wale ambao hawajaokoka, ni injili ya kuokoa maisha, ambayo peke yake ina chakula halisi.

Njia ya Mungu ni njia ya utimilifu wa kiungu; njia zingine zote zinategemea mafanikio ya mwanadamu. Wale wanaofuata dini ya utimilifu wa kiungu husema, “Siwezi kutimiza lolote kwa uwezo au wema wangu mwenyewe, na ninajitupa kwenye rehema ya YHVH, nikitumaini dhabihu ya kutosha ya Mwanawe kwa niaba yangu.” Wale wanaofuata njia ya mafanikio ya kibinadamu, hakuna nzuri

 

2024-08-02T07:57:22+00:000 Comments

Cg – Apandaye katika Mwili, Utavuna Ufisadi  6: 7-10

Apandaye katika Mwili, Utavuna Ufisadi 
6: 7-10

CHAMBUA: Nani hatimaye aliwadanganya waumini wa Galatia? Kwa nini ni muhimu kutangaza kusudi zima la Mungu? Ni nani mdanganyifu mkuu? Je, waumini wanaweza kuwa na hatia ya kumdhihaki Mungu? Jinsi gani? Kwa nini Mungu huwaadibu watoto Wake? Je, kupanda kwa mwili kunamaanisha nini? Je, kupanda kwa Ruach kunamaanisha nini? Kwa nini Paulo anahitaji kutukumbusha kwamba kazi yetu katika Bwana si bure?

TAFAKARI: Je, unapanda mazao ya aina gani ya kiroho? Ikiwa tunaweza tu kuzaliana aina zetu wenyewe, umewapata waamini wangapi kwa Masihi? Unawezaje kujua kwamba utavuna mazao mazuri? Unawezaje kupanda kwa Ruach wiki hii? Unajua nani anayepanda mavuno ya ufisadi? Je, unawaombea? Unaweza kuwasaidiaje? Je, unatafuta fursa za kuwatendea wengine mema? Kwa nini? Kwa nini isiwe hivyo? Je, kuna mabadiliko yoyote maalum ambayo Ruach anakusukuma kufanya?

Wagalatia ambao walikuwa wameacha neema kwa ajili ya kushika sheria walionywa kwamba kama hawakujiweka chini ya huduma ya wale walimu wanaowaongoza katika neema, wangevuna mavuno ya uharibifu.

Anapowapa waumini wa Galatia baadhi ya maneno ya mwisho ya kiroho, Paulo anatumia sheria inayojulikana sana ya botania – kwamba mbegu iliyotolewa inaweza tu kuzaa aina yake yenyewe – ili kuonyesha sheria za Mungu zinazofanana na zisizoweza kuvunjwa katika ulimwengu wa maadili na kiroho: kudanganyika – Mungu hadhihakiwi. Chochote apandacho mtu, ndicho atakachovuna (6:7a). Ilikuwa ni kana kwamba Wagalatia waliopotoka walikuwa wakijiambia, “Sio muhimu ni walimu gani tunaowasikiliza, Paulo na wachungaji kutoka makanisa ya Galatia, au wapinga wamishonari kutoka Yerusalemu.” Hivyo, tayari walikuwa wamejidanganya wenyewe, wakiongozwa na upotevu (3:1) na waamini wa Kiyahudi katika kufikiri kwamba kutii amri 613 za Moshe, zilizowakilishwa hasa na tohara, ilikuwa ni muhimu kwa ajili ya kupata msimamo sahihi mbele za Mungu (2:15-21). 3:2-3, 4:8-11). Kudhihakiwa (Kigiriki: mukterizo) maana yake ni kuinua pua, kudhihaki, kupuuza, au kudhihaki. Neno hili linapotumiwa kimaongezi, hurejelea usaliti wa nia mbaya na dharau iliyofichika kwa ishara za kejeli licha ya maneno ya fadhili kijuujuu. Inamaanisha taaluma ya nje ya heshima iliyopunguzwa na usemi usio wa moja kwa moja wa dharau. Wazo ambalo Paulo alitaka kuwaelekezea Wagalatia waliopotoka lilikuwa kwamba halikuwa na maana kufikiria kwamba wangeweza kumzidi akili BWANA kwa kuvuna mavuno tofauti na yale waliyopanda. Kwa hiyo, Paulo aliwakumbusha kwamba wasingeweza kumshinda Mungu kwa werevu kwa kufanya hivyo, kwani kungesababisha maafa katika maisha yao na kuadibu kutoka kwa mkono wa Ha’Shem.163

Hatari kubwa ya walimu wa uwongo wa zama zozote, si tu katika mafundisho yao maovu, bali katika kufundishwa kwao ukweli wa Mungu. Mtu anayefundisha fundisho la uwongo kwa jina la Adui, au kwa msingi wa mamlaka yake mwenyewe, mara chache ana ushawishi mwingi, haswa katika Kanisa. Siku zote imekuwa na itaendelea kuwa walimu wa uongo wanaodai kufundisha kwa jina la Mungu ambao ni waharibifu zaidi. Lakini watu waovu na walaghai watazidi kuwa waovu zaidi, wakidanganya na kudanganyika (Timotheo wa Pili 3:13). Katika siku za mwisho, Yeshua alisema, walimu hao wadanganyifu wataongezeka sana katika idadi na ushawishi. Kwa maana watatokea masihi wa uongo na manabii wa uongo na kuonyesha ishara kubwa na maajabu wapate kuwapoteza, kama yamkini, hata walio wateule (Mathayo 24:24). Ndiyo maana ni muhimu sana kutangaza kusudi zima la Mungu (Matendo 20:27), si tu kwa ajili ya kulijenga Kanisa, bali pia kwa ajili ya kulilinda dhidi ya kudhoofishwa na walimu wa uongo. Waumini wasiojua Maandiko wako hatarini sana kwa hila za joka kuu. Neno la Mungu si chakula chetu tu, bali pia silaha zetu (Waefeso 6:10-17).

Mdanganyifu mkuu, bila shaka, ni Adui, ambaye, wakati wowote anaposema uongo yeye ni tu yeye mwenyewe – kwa maana yeye ni mwongo na baba wa uongo (Yohana 8:44). Bwana wetu anawahakikishia watoto wake kwamba uharibifu wa mharibu ni hakika, kwamba nyoka wa zamani, aitwaye Ibilisi na Shetani, [atakamatwa] na kufungwa kwa miaka elfu katika kuzimu (Ufunuo 20: 1-3). Lakini wakati huo huo yeye ndiye Adui mkuu, ambaye kusudi lake kuu ni kudanganya na kuharibu. Katika Wagalatia 6:7b-10, Paulo anasisitiza hoja kwamba hata waamini wanaweza kuwa na hatia ya kumdhihaki Mungu (ona maelezo ya Ufunuo Bc – Kanisa la Thiatira), na kwamba kuokolewa hakuwaepushi kutokana na matokeo yasiyoepukika ya kanuni za msingi za kupanda na kuvuna. Nidhamu haiendani na upendo. Ni ukosefu wa nidhamu, kwa kweli, ambao haupatani na upendo (tazama maelezo ya Waebrania Cz – Mungu Anaadibisha Watoto Wake).164

Mafundisho ya uwongo ni biashara kubwa sana. Kumtoa mtu anayedai kuwa muumini nje ya ushirika, na kumtenga, itakuwa ni kumkabidhi kwa Shetani kwa uharibifu wa tabia yake ya kimwili, ili roho yake iokolewe katika siku ya Bwana Yesu (Wakorintho wa Kwanza 5:5). . Shetani

 

2024-08-02T07:04:17+00:000 Comments

Cf – Mchukuliane Mizigo, na kwa njia hii Unaitimiza Torati ya Masihi  6:1-6

Mchukuliane Mizigo, na kwa njia hii

Unaitimiza Torati ya Masihi 
6:1-6

CHAMBUA: Je, ukweli wa dhambi ni upi katika maisha yetu? Je, wajibu wa Mmataifa muumini ni upi kwa Torati? Je, tunapaswa kufanya nini watu wanapotenda dhambi? Je, tuzirejeshe vipi? Je, sisi mara nyingi hufanya nini badala yake? Je, tunapaswa kufanya nini mwenye dhambi anaporudi kwa miguu yake? Kwa nini? Paulo anatupa tahadhari gani? Je, tunatimizaje maana halisi ya Torati? Je, Torati ya Moshe na Torati ya Masihi ni tofauti, au ni sawa? Eleza kwa maneno yako mwenyewe. Je, ni sababu gani inayowafanya waamini wengi kutojisumbua kuwasaidia ndugu na dada zao ambao wameshikwa na dhambi? Je, dawa ya Paulo ni ipi kwa hilo? Je! Paulo alikuwa akiwauliza waamini wasio Wayahudi wa Galatia wafanye nini?

TAFAKARI: Ni lini mara ya mwisho dhambi hiyo ilikushika kwa njia kuu kama muumini? Umefikiaje hatua hiyo? Matokeo ya matendo yako yalikuwa yapi? Nani alikuja pamoja nawe kukusaidia kurejesha? Jinsi gani ilishughulikiwa? Ni wakati gani umelazimika kukabiliana na dhambi kwa mwamini mwenzako? Je, wakati huo ulikuwa umekomaa vya kutosha katika Bwana kuweza kulishughulikia kibiblia? Je, ulishikilia maana ya kweli ya Torati ya kumpenda jirani yako? Je, mwenye dhambi aliitikia kwa ushirika ukirejeshwa, au walipinga kwa ushirika bado ulivunjwa na wewe na kusanyiko lako? Je, unafikiri unabeba jukumu lolote ikiwa mwenye dhambi hatatubu? Kwa nini? Kwa nini isiwe hivyo? Je, Mungu amekupa nafasi gani kubeba mizigo ya wengine? Je, ni ukombozi kiasi gani kujua kwamba utajibu tu kwa ajili ya mzigo wako mwenyewe, na si jinsi
ulivyoishi ikilinganishwa na wengine?

Waumini wa Galatia hawakuwa watu huru wasio na sheria ambao wangeweza kuishi maisha yao jinsi walivyotaka (kama vile sisi si watu huru wasio na sheria leo), lakini badala yake waliwekwa kwenye kiwango cha maana halisi ya Torati, ambayo Masihi anaishikilia: mpende jirani yako kama
nafsi yako.

Dhambi ni ukweli katika maisha ya kila mwamini. Tukisema hatuna dhambi, tunajidanganya wenyewe wala kweli haimo ndani yetu, Yohana anatuonya. Kwa hakika, anaendelea kusema: Tukisema kwamba hatukutenda dhambi, twamfanya Yeye kuwa mwongo na Neno lake halimo ndani yetu (Yohana wa Kwanza 1:8 na 10). Maana sisi sote twajikwaa kwa njia nyingi (Yakobo 3:2). Ikiwa hatungekuwa chini ya dhambi hatungehitaji silaha za Mungu ili kusimama kidete dhidi ya hila za shetani na kupinga nyakati zinapokuwa mbaya (Waefeso 6:11 na 13). Wala
tusingehitaji kusikiliza onyo la Yakobo kuhusu kujaribiwa na kuvutwa na kushawishiwa na tamaa yetu wenyewe au maonyo yake ya kuweka mbali uchafu wote wa kimaadili na kukithiri kwa uovu (Yakobo 1:14 na 21).155

Paulo anaendelea kufanya kazi kuelekea kujibu swali hili, “Ni nini wajibu wa Mataifa anayeamini kwa Torati?” Hii inafuatia baada ya 5:26 bila mapumziko katika mawazo. Akasema: Ndugu zangu, ikiwa mtu ameshikwa na dhambi. Wazo ni lile la mtu kukimbia dhambi, lakini dhambi ikiwa na kasi zaidi, humpata mwenye dhambi na kumshika. Bila Ruach, washika sheria waliwatendea wenye dhambi kama hao kwa ukali sana (tazama maelezo juu ya Maisha ya Kristo Gq – Mwanamke Aliyepatikana Katika Tendo la Uzinzi). Lakini, tofauti na hao, Paulo anatangaza: Ninyi mnaoongozwa na Roho (Wakorintho wa Kwanza 2:14-3:4; Waefeso 4:13-14; Waebrania 5:12-14), kurejesha (Kigiriki: katartizete, a). neno linalotumika katika Kigiriki cha kilimwengu kwa ajili ya kuweka mifupa iliyovunjika na katika B’rit Chadashah kwa ajili ya kutengeneza nyavu za kuvua samaki) mtu kama huyo kwa roho ya upole (6:1a). Kwa hiyo, watu wa kiroho kati ya Wagalatia, yaani, wale ambao walikuwa bado wanaishi maisha yao kwa kumtegemea Ruach, walitiwa moyo kuwarejesha Wagalatia wale ambao walikuwa wameacha njia hiyo kwa ajili
ya yule anayefundishwa na Wayahudi (ona Ag – Who were the Judaizers. ?).

Hapa, ni muhimu kutambua kwamba kumrejesha mtu ambaye ameshikwa na dhambi ni mchakato nyeti kwa sababu Torati pia inakataza kuaibisha na kuwaaibisha wengine. Sheria ya Mdomo (tazama ufafanuzi juu ya Maisha ya Kristo Ei – Sheria ya Mdomo) inaifupisha kwa maneno machache, ikisema “Anayemwaibisha jirani yake ni kama anamwaga damu (Bava Metzia 58b). Kwa hiyo, amri hiyo inatumika tu kwa makosa makubwa ya kiadili. Mfano pekee tulionao kutoka katika maandiko ya Paulo ni kwamba mtu fulani alikuwa akifanya mapenzi na mke wa baba yake (Wakorintho wa Kwanza 5:1), lakini uzinzi, ushoga na uasherati pia ni ukiukwaji wa wazi wa viwango vya Torati, ambavyo ni mwongozo wetu wa kuishi leo (ona ufafanuzi juu ya Kutoka Dh – Musa na Torati). Hiyo ndiyo aina ya kitu tunachozungumzia hapa, sio dhambi za nikeli-na-dime za utu na mapungufu ya kibinafsi ambayo kila mtu huwa nayo kila wakati. Ikiwa tungekemeana kwa aina hizo za mambo, hayangeisha. Kila mtu anaweza kuona makosa ya kila mtu. Mawaidha ya Paulo hapa hayataki kuonyesha makosa yetu; inahitaji kuletwa marekebisho pale makosa makubwa yanapojitokeza.156

Hata hivyo, wakati wa kumrejesha mtu aliyeshikwa na dhambi, ni wajibu wa mwamini wa kiroho kumsaidia mwenye dhambi mara anaposimama tena. Haitoshi kumsaidia tu kuacha dhambi na tu

2024-08-01T13:23:10+00:000 Comments

Cd – Tunda la Roho ni Upole  5:23a

Tunda la Roho ni Upole 
5:23a

CHAMBUA: Kwa nini neno upole ni gumu kufafanua leo? Je, prautes inamaanisha upole? Kwa nini? Kwa nini isiwe hivyo? Je, Biblia huwahi kusema kwamba YHVH ni mpole? Je, Maandiko yanamtaja Yeshua kuwa mpole? Kwa njia gani? Kwa nini upole unapingana na utamaduni wetu leo? Je,
unaweza kuwa mpole, lakini mwenye msimamo? Vipi? Ni mambo gani mawili tunayohitaji kukumbuka kuhusu upole?

TAFAKARI: Unaendeleaje na kukariri tunda la Ruach? Tatu za kwanza zina silabi moja, tatu za pili zina silabi mbili, na tatu za mwisho zina silabi tatu. Ni lini mara ya mwisho ulijibu kama Mfalme Daudi, Yeremia, Stefano au Paulo? Je, unakuza roho ya upole katika nyumba yako? Je, unajibu kwa upole mahali pako pa kazi? Unataka shalom? Inaanzia wapi?

Paulo alipozungumza juu ya kutembea kwa Ruach (ona Bv – Tembea kwa Rua, na Sio Tamaa za Mwili), hakuwa akimaanisha kufuata maono na mafunuo ya fumbo. Badala yake, alitoa orodha ya sifa zinazoelezea mtu anayeongozwa na Ruach. Hivyo, ushahidi wa tunda la Ruach ni maisha
yaliyobadilika. Paulo sasa anaonyesha njia ifaayo ambayo wale waaminifu kwa Mungu katika Masihi wake wanapaswa kuifuata. Matunda yanasimama kinyume na matendo ya mwili. Tunda la Rua linatuonyesha kwa urahisi sifa zinazoonyesha Ufalme wa Mungu. Lakini, tofauti na matendo ya mwili, tunda la Roho ni upendo, furaha, amani, uvumilivu, utu wema, fadhili, uaminifu, upole na kiasi (5:22). ) Vipengele hivi vyote vinapaswa kuwa sehemu ya maisha yako unaporuhusu Ruach ha-Kodeshi kutiririka kupitia kwako.

Kati ya matunda yote ya Ruach, upole (Geek: prautes) ndilo neno gumu zaidi kutafsiri kutoka kwa yote kwa sababu maana yake imebadilika sana kwa miaka. Hata katika muktadha wa Maandiko mara nyingi humaanisha mambo kadhaa. Kwa mfano, katika Mathayo Sura ya 5, 11 na 21 prautes inatumika kuwa chini ya mapenzi ya Mungu katika maisha yetu, kumwamini na kumfuata. Kisha, kuna nyakati nyingine, kwa mfano katika Yakobo Sura ya 1, prautes inatumiwa kuelezea mtu ambaye anafundishika. Lakini kwa kawaida, unaposoma Wakorintho wa Kwanza 4, Waefeso 4, Wakorintho wa Pili 10, Wafilipi 4 na hapa Wagalatia 5, ina maana ya kujali, upole, na huruma.

Lakini watu wengi, kwa sababu ya tafsiri ya King James, wanahusisha neno hili na upole, au unyenyekevu. Tatizo la neno upole, ni kwamba katika miaka mia nne tangu Biblia ya King James (iliyochapishwa mwaka 1611) kuandikwa, maana za maneno zimebadilika. Kwa mfano, Kanisa Kuu la Mtakatifu Paul liliharibiwa katika moto mkubwa wa London katika 1666. Mfalme wa Uingereza aliagiza Sir Christopher Wren ajenge upya jengo hilo kubwa, naye alitumia miaka thelathini na mitano iliyofuata ya maisha yake kufanya hivyo. Mnamo 1711 alipomaliza kazi hiyo, Malkia Ann alikuja kuzuru jengo lililomalizika alisema lilionekana kuwa “bandia” na “mbaya. ” Naye Wren akashusha pumzi na kumshukuru kwa maneno yake mazuri! Kwa sababu katika mwaka wa 1711 neno “bandia” lilimaanisha usanii, na neno “kutisha” lilimaanisha kutisha. Upole ni vivyo hivyo kwa sababu leo upole unamaanisha udhaifu. Watu wapole wanakimbiwa. Watu wapole hawawezi kufanya maamuzi au kufanya lolote. Kwa hiyo, ni neno hasi leo. Tafsiri bora ya prautes leo itakuwa upole. Kati ya sifa tisa za tunda la Ruach, hii na hii ifuatayo hazimhusu HaShem. TaNaKh kamwe hairejelei YHVH kama watu wa heshima, na katika B’rit Chadashah, ni Mwana pekee anayesemwa kuwa mpole wakati wa kupata mwili Kwake. Ingawa alikuwa Mungu alipokuwa akiishi duniani kama Mwana wa Adamu, alikuwa mpole [prautes] na mnyenyekevu wa moyo (Mathayo 11:29, 21:5; 2 Wakorintho 10:1). Na kama Bwana wetu, tunapaswa kufuata kwa bidii upole (Timotheo wa Kwanza 6:11), na kuuvaa kama vazi (Wakolosai 3:12).

Kwa hiyo, Biblia inamaanisha nini inaposema tunapaswa kuwa wapole? Ni tabia hiyo ya unyenyekevu na ya upole ambayo ni mfano wa nguvu chini ya udhibiti. Sasa hiyo inaenda kinyume na utamaduni tunaoishi leo. Maneno ya upole na nguvu hayaonekani kama yanafaa katika sentensi moja. Mnamo 1977 Robert Ringer aliandika kitabu chenye kichwa LookingOut for Number One, na kikawa mada ya utamaduni wetu katika kipindi cha miaka arobaini iliyopita. Na kitabu kilisema kwamba unahitaji kujiangalia mwenyewe na kujiweka kwanza kwa sababu hakuna mtu mwingineatafanya. Kwa hiyo, Upole unaenda kinyume na utamaduni kwa mawazo hayo.

Upole haimaanishi kuwa huwezi kuwa na msimamo, mafanikio au kiongozi mzuri. Upole ni tabia ambayo kwayo tunafanya mambo hayo. Inaashiria mtu mwenye nguvu, lakini chini ya udhibiti. Hiyo inajidhihirisha kwa njia mbili. Kwanza, jinsi tunavyowatendea watu wanaotuzunguka. Biblia inasema kwamba tunapaswa kuwatendea kwa upole. Kisha, pili, kwa jinsi tunavyoitikia jinsi watu wanavyotutendea. Unatendaje mtu anapokutendea vibaya? Tunatakiwa kuwa wapole katikati yetu

 

2024-08-01T13:24:08+00:000 Comments

Ce – Tunda la Roho ni Kujitawala  5: 23b-26

Tunda la Roho ni Kujitawala 
5: 23b-26

DIG: Unaweza kufafanuaje kujidhibiti? Je, ni wakati nyeupe-knuckle? Kwa nini tuna vita ndani yetu? Je, tunashindaje vita hivyo vya ndani wakati asili yetu ya dhambi inataka kufanya jambo baya? Je, nidhamu na kujidhibiti huondoa furaha yote maishani au kweli hukupa uhuru wa kufurahia maisha?

TAFAKARI: Sote tunapigana vita hivi. Mungu alitupa mahitaji na tamaa. Lakini ni wakati gani umejiingiza kwenye matatizo kwa sababu ya kukosa kujizuia? Vema, Bwana alikuwa na dawa kwa hilo. Ruhusu Ruach atawale maisha yako. Jisalimishe. Ili kutumia picha ya maisha yako kuwa gari,
waumini wengi wanamtaka Yeshua kwenye gari. Zungumza katika maisha yangu. Niambie ninapohitaji kupunguza kasi, niambie ninapohitaji kuongeza kasi. Niambie ninapohitaji kugeuka kushoto, niambie ninapohitaji kugeuka kulia. Nataka uwe na mimi kwenye gari, sitaki tu uendeshe gari. Nitasikiliza mapendekezo mengi utakayotoa, nitasikiliza. Lakini ikiwa kweli ninapata hamu ya kwenda upande tofauti, ndipo ninapoenda! Ni nani aliye na mikono yake kwenye usukani wa maisha yako?

Paulo alipozungumza juu ya kutembea kwa Ruach (ona Bv – Tembea kwa Rua, na Sio Tamaa za Mwili), hakuwa akimaanisha kufuata maono na mafunuo ya fumbo. Badala yake, alitoa orodha ya sifa zinazoelezea mtu anayeongozwa na Ruach. Hivyo, ushahidi wa tunda la Ruach ni maisha
yaliyobadilika. Paulo sasa anaonyesha njia ifaayo ambayo wale waaminifu kwa Mungu katika Masihi wake wanapaswa kuifuata. Matunda yanasimama kinyume na matendo ya mwili. Tunda la Rua linatuonyesha kwa urahisi sifa zinazoonyesha Ufalme wa Mungu. Lakini, tofauti na matendo ya mwili, tunda la Roho ni upendo, furaha, amani, uvumilivu, utu wema, fadhili, uaminifu, upole na kiasi (5:22). ) Vipengele hivi vyote vinapaswa kuwa sehemu ya maisha yako unaporuhusu Ruach ha-Kodeshi kutiririka kupitia kwako.

Tunda la mwisho la Ruach ni kujitawala (kwa Kigiriki: enkrateia). Enkrateia inarejelea kuzuia matamanio na hamu ya kula. Nidhamu inaweza kuwa kisawe cha kujidhibiti. Lakini si kama tunakunja ngumi huku vifundo vyetu vikiwa vyeupe tukijidhibiti kama inavyoruhusu Ruach ha-Kodesh kututawala.

Wahenga wanahusisha ukosefu wa kujizuia na kugeukia miungu ya ajabu, “Yeye aziraye nguo zake kwa hasira, au kuvunja vyombo vyake kwa ghadhabu, hatimaye ataabudu sanamu. Kwa maana hiyo ndiyo njia ya mwelekeo mbaya: leo inamwambia mwanadamu, ‘Rarua nguo zako,’ na kesho inamwambia, ‘Abudu sanamu’ (Shabbat 105b).” Kama ilivyo kwa upole, hata hivyo, tunda hili halimhusu ADONAI, ambaye kwa hakika hahitaji kujizuia. Kwa maana mimi ni BWANA. sibadiliki, anatujulisha (Malaki 3:6a). Katika uzima wake wa milele, Bwana wetu Yeshua Masiya ni yeye yule jana, leo na hata milele (Waebrania 13:8). Utakatifu mkamilifu una udhibiti kamili. Katika kufanyika kwake mwili, hata hivyo, Masihi alikuwa kielelezo cha kujitawala. Hakujaribiwa kamwe au kulaghaiwa kufanya au kusema chochote ambacho hakikuwa sawa na mapenzi ya Baba Yake na asili yake ya uungu. Tena, kama Yeshua, waamini wanapaswa kufanya kila juhudi, katika imani [yao] kuongeza kiasi (Petro wa Pili 1:5-6).152

Enkrateia inatumiwa mara nyingi katika Biblia. Paulo anatumia neno hili katika 1 Wakorintho 9:25 kwa mwanariadha anayejidhibiti katika mambo yote. Pia alitumia enkrateia katika uongozi wa kanisa la mtaa. Kusema kwamba mzee lazima awe zaidi ya kukosolewa – mume wa mke mmoja, mwenye nia safi, mwenye kujitawala, mwenye heshima, mkaribishaji na anayeweza kufundisha (Timotheo wa Kwanza 3:2). Nidhamu ya kiroho ya
kujizuia ni uwezo wa kufanya jambo sahihi hata kama kitu ndani yako kinataka kufanya jambo baya. Na usifanye makosa juu yake, asili yetu iliyoanguka inataka kufanya jambo baya. Na tunapaswa kumwacha Ruach ashinde vita hivyo ndani yetu.

Sasa, baadhi ya watu wanafikiri kwamba hiyo inaondoa uhuru. Kwamba inaondoa furaha maishani wakati Mungu anapotuzuia kutoka kwa mambo haya yote. Ukweli ni kwamba kinyume chake ni kweli. Tunapojifunza kuishi maisha ya nidhamu na kujitawala, hapo ndipo tunapopata uhuru kikweli. Katika 1 Wakorintho 7:5 Paulo alizungumza kuhusu kujizuia kuhusiana na mambo ya ngono. Kuwa na uwezo wa kudhibiti tamaa hizo ili Shetani asije kukujaribu kwa sababu ya ukosefu wako wa kujizuia. Kwa hiyo Ha’Shem anatupa mipaka ambayo tunapaswa kuishi maisha yetu. Mungu alianzisha ngono. Lakini aliweka mpaka wa ndoa juu yake ili kutulinda, na kutupa njia ya haki ya kudhihirisha matamanio yetu ya zinaa. Ngono ni kama moto. Moto katika mahali pa moto au tanuri yako ni jambo zuri. Inaweza kupasha joto nyumba yako na kupika chakula chako. Lakini moto kwenye sebule yako au jikoni yako unaweza kuharibu nyumba yako na kuua wanafamilia wako. Kwa hiyo, kujidhibiti kiroho ni muhimu sawa na
mipaka ya kimwili. Uhuru wa kweli huja kwa kuishi ndani ya mipaka yenye ulinzi ya Neno la Mungu.
Paulo alionyesha tu

 

2024-08-01T13:14:16+00:000 Comments

Cc – Tunda la Roho ni Uaminifu 5: 22g

Tunda la Roho ni Uaminifu
5: 22g

CHAMBUA: Tunapaswa kuwa na matunda ngapi ya Ruach? Kundi la tatu la matunda linaashiria nini? Je, tunaishi katika utamaduni wa aina gani? Je, MUNGU anatarajia nini kutoka kwetu? Ni njia zipi nne ambazo tunaweza kuwa waaminifu?

TAFAKARI: Je, kama waumini, tunapaswa kutendaje? Unapochunguza maisha yako, je, unafikiri kweli umekuwa mnyoofu kwako mwenyewe? Je, unasema ukweli kwa upendo na neema? Je, unashika neno lako? Ikiwa ulikuwa kwenye kesi kwa kuwa muumini, je, kungekuwa na ushahidi wa kutosha wa kukutia hatiani? Je, Mungu anaweza kukuamini? Semper fi?

Paulo alipozungumza juu ya kutembea kwa Ruach (ona Bv – Tembea kwa Rua, na Sio Tamaa za Mwili), hakuwa akimaanisha kufuata maono na mafunuo ya fumbo. Badala yake, alitoa orodha ya sifa zinazoelezea mtu anayeongozwa na Ruach. Hivyo, ushahidi wa tunda la Ruach ni maisha
yaliyobadilika. Paulo sasa anaonyesha njia ifaayo ambayo wale waaminifu kwa Mungu katika Masihi wake wanapaswa kuifuata. Matunda yanasimama kinyume na matendo ya mwili. Tunda la Ruakhi hutuonyesha kwa urahisi sifa zinazotambulisha Ufalme wa Mungu. Lakini, tofauti na matendo ya mwili, tunda la Roho ni upendo, furaha, amani, uvumilivu, utu wema, fadhili, uaminifu, upole na kiasi (5:22). ) Vipengele hivi vyote vinapaswa kuwa sehemu ya maisha yako unaporuhusu Ruach
ha-Kodeshi kutiririka kupitia kwako.

Tunapofikia tunda la Ruach katika 5:22 na 23, kundi la kwanza la watatu, upendo, furaha, na amani ni watu wa Mungu, kila kitu hutiririka kutoka humo, na yote ni maneno ya silabi moja; kundi la pili la watatu, subira, fadhili, na wema ni tabia ya mwanadamu, jinsi tunavyotendeana, na yote ni maneno mawili ya silabi; na kundi la tatu la matatu, uaminifu, upole, na kiasi viko ndani, ni jinsi tunavyokuwa vile ADONAI anataka tuwe, na yote ni maneno matatu ya silabi.

Uaminifu (Kigiriki: pistis, ikimaanisha imani, tumaini, imani) ni dhihirisho la tunda la Ruach linalohusu kutegemewa, uaminifu, uadilifu na uaminifu. Yeremia alitangaza kwamba rehema za BWANA hazitaisha, kwa maana rehema zake hazikomi kamwe. Wao ni mpya kila asubuhi! Uaminifu wako ni mkuu (Maombolezo 3:22-23). Kwa kuwa Yesu alikuwa mwaminifu, alijifanya kuwa hana utukufu, akatwaa namna ya mtumwa, akawa ana mfano wa wanadamu, akaonekana ana sura kama mwanadamu. Alijinyenyekeza – akawa mtii hata mauti, naam, mauti ya msalaba. Na kwa sababu ya uaminifu wa Mwana, Baba alimwadhimisha sana na kumpa Jina lipitalo kila jina (Wafilipi 2:7-9). Na kama vile alivyokuwa mwaminifu alipokuja duniani mara ya kwanza, atakuwa mwaminifu kuja tena kwa njia ile ile uliyomwona akienda mbinguni (Matendo 1:11c). Katika maono yake makuu huko Patmo, Yohana alimwona Masihi akiwa ameketi juu ya farasi mweupe, na Yeye aliyempanda anaitwa Mwaminifu na wa Kweli (Ufunuo 19:11 ). Uwe mwaminifu rhata kufa, Bwana anawaambia wafuasi wake, nami nitakupa taji ya uzima (Ufunuo 2:11).

Kuna wengi katika Biblia wanaoitwa waaminifu. Wengi hawatakushangaza: wanaume kama Moshe, Samweli, Abrahamu, Danieli, Paulo, Timotheo na Petro. Lakini kuna baadhi ya watu ambao pengine hujawahi kuwasikia, kama vile Hanani (Nehemia 7:2), Epafra (Wakolosai 1:7), Lidia (Matendo 16:11-15), na Onesimo (Wakolosai 4:9). Labda haya si majina ya kawaida, lakini Biblia inasema walikuwa waaminifu. Hawakuwa maarufu, lakini walikuwa waaminifu kwa Bwana. Na BWANA anatutarajia sisi pia kuwa waaminifu. Katika kuliandikia kanisa la Korintho, Paulo anaandika: Basi, hivi ndivyo iwapasavyo kutuhesabu sisi (waumini): kama watumishi wa Masihi na waliokabidhiwa siri ambazo Mungu amefunua. Sasa inatakiwa kwamba wale waliopewa dhamana lazima wathibitike kuwa waaminifu (Wakorintho wa Kwanza 4:1-2). Mungu ni mwaminifu na anatutazamia tuwe waaminifu. Hiyo ina maana gani? Tunatarajiwa kuwa wanaume na wanawake waadilifu. Tunaishi katika utamaduni usio na uadilifu kidogo. Fikiria kuhusu hili kwa muda. Tunaishi katika utamaduni unaosherehekea ukosefu wa uadilifu. Ikiwa mtu anaweza kukata kona, au kufanya kidogo, katika biashara, katika michezo, shuleni, na kuachana nayo, utamaduni wetu unapongeza hilo. Lakini kama waumini, tunatarajiwa kuwa wa kutegemewa, waaminifu na wa kutegemewa kwa BWANA. Kuna njia nne ambazo tunaweza kuwa waaminifu.
Kwanza, kuwa mwaminifu kwako mwenyewe. Mara nyingi tunapojilinganisha na jamii inayotuzunguka, hutufanya tujisikie vizuri zaidi kwa kusema, “Vema, ninafanya kazi bora kuliko watu wengi. Maadili yangu ni ya juu kidogo, na nia yangu ni bora kidogo.” Kwa hiyo tunahalalisha dhambi zetu kwa kujidanganya wenyewe, tukisema, “Mimi ni bora kuliko watu wengi. Kwa kweli haijalishi. Mwenendo wangu unakubalika kwa Mungu.” Uadilifu na uaminifu huanza tunapokuwa waaminifu kwetu wenyewe. Uongo hatari zaidi tunaosema ni uwongo ambao tunajiambia wenyewe. Tunapojiaminisha ni si zetu

2024-08-01T11:36:52+00:000 Comments

Cb – Tunda la Roho  ni Utu Wema 5: 22f

Tunda la Roho  ni Utu Wema
5: 22f

CHIMBUA: Tunamaanisha nini tunapowaambia watoto wetu kuwa “Kuwa wema?” Je, kuwa “mzuri” inatosha kukuingiza mbinguni? Kwa nini? Kwa nini isiwe hivyo? Mungu ni mwema vipi? BWANA alimwambia nini Mika? Biblia inafafanuaje wema? Farisayo alikuwa akifanyaje lililo sawa, kwa njia
isiyofaa kwa sababu isiyofaa?

TAFAKARI: Unawezaje kuonyesha ukarimu kwa wengine wiki hii? Je, unafananaje na Mungu unapoonyesha wema kwa wengine? Unawezaje kutenda haki wiki hii? Unawezaje kupenda rehema wiki hii? Unawezaje kuhakikisha kuwa unafanya jambo sahihi kwa njia ifaayo, kwa sababu ifaayo? Unawezaje kutembea kwa unyenyekevu zaidi na Mungu wako? Ni njia gani pekee tunaweza kujiona kuwa wema?

Paulo alipozungumza juu ya kutembea kwa Ruach (ona Bv – Tembea kwa Rua, na Sio Tamaa za Mwili), hakuwa akimaanisha kufuata maono na mafunuo ya fumbo. Badala yake, alitoa orodha ya sifa zinazoelezea mtu anayeongozwa na Ruach. Hivyo, ushahidi wa tunda la Ruach ni maisha yaliyobadilika. Paulo sasa anaonyesha njia ifaayo ambayo wale waaminifu kwa Mungu katika Masihi wake wanapaswa kuifuata. Matunda yanasimama kinyume na matendo ya mwili. Tunda la Rua linatuonyesha kwa urahisi sifa zinazoonyesha Ufalme wa Mungu. Lakini, tofauti na matendo ya mwili, tunda la Roho ni upendo, furaha, amani, uvumilivu, utu wema, fadhili, uaminifu, upole na kiasi (5:22). ) Vipengele hivi vyote vinapaswa kuwa sehemu ya maisha yako unaporuhusu Ruach ha-Kodeshi kutiririka kupitia kwako.

Wema (Kigiriki: agathosune, Kiebrania: tov) unahusiana na ubora wa kimaadili na wa kiroho ambao unajulikana kwa utamu wake na wema wake wa utendaji. Kwa kweli, wema na wema ni sawa sana. Na kisawe kingine cha maneno hayo mawili itakuwa huruma. Neno wema au wema linapatikana takribani mara 600 katika Biblia – karibu mara 350 katika TaNaKh na karibu 250 katika B’rit Chadashah. Na si lazima uende mbali sana katika Biblia ili kuona neno hili likitumika. Mungu akaona ya kuwa nuru ni njema (Mwanzo 1:4). Na kila wakati Mungu alipoumba kitu katika Mwanzo, aliona kwamba ni nzuri. Katika sura ya pili ya Mwanzo ni mara ya kwanza tunaona hasi iliyoambatanishwa nayo: Si vyema kwa mtu kuwa peke yake (Mwanzo 2:18). Tunatumia neno nzuri kila wakati.
Tunawaambia watoto wetu tunapoenda dukani, “Kuwa mzuri!” Je! unajua hiyo inamaanisha nini? Inamaanisha, “Msichome nyumba au kuuana nikiwa nimeondoka.” Kwa kweli hawapaswi kufanya chochote, sivyo? Hutarajii
wao kusafisha nyumba, au kuosha gari. Ikiwa hawafanyi uharibifu wowote basi wametimiza matarajio yako ya “Kuwa mzuri.” Lakini hilo silo maana ya Biblia inaposema “Uwe mwema.” Biblia inasema tunda la Roho ni wema. Hiyo ina maana gani? Mungu ni mwema vipi? Ungesema, “Mungu amenipa wokovu,” “Mungu amenisamehe dhambi zangu,” “Mungu amenipa familia ya ajabu,” “Mungu amenipa uzima leo.” Kila kitu ulichosema kuhusu wema wa Mungu kinahusiana na kile Mungu anachotupa. Wema unafungamana na wazo la ukarimu. Kwa upande mmoja, Mungu ni mwema kwa jinsi alivyo, ndiyo. ADONAI ni mwema kwa wote. Ana rehema kwa viumbe vyake vyote (Zaburi 145:9), kuwatendea mema, ee Mwenyezi-Mungu, watu wema na wanyoofu wa mioyo yao (Zaburi 125:4). Lakini hiyo si kweli kwetu. Kwetu sisi, wema si wema wa ndani tu, bali ni kitu tunachofanya. Na moja ya njia tunazoonyesha hiyo ni kwa ukarimu. Hivyo, tunakuwa kama Mungu tunapokuwa wakarimu. Biblia inafafanuaje wema? Katika manabii, Mika anajiuliza, “Nimjie BWANA na nini? Niiname na kitu gani mbele za Mungu aliye juu? Je! nimtoe pamoja na sadaka za kuteketezwa, pamoja na ndama wa mwaka mmoja? Je! BWANA atapendezwa na kondoo waume elfu, na wingi wa mito ya mafuta? Je! nimtoe mzaliwa wangu wa kwanza kwa kosa langu, mzao wa tumbo langu kwa dhambi ya nafsi yangu” ( Mika 6:6-7 )? Kisha Mungu anamjibu Mika kwa kusema, “Unataka kujua wema ni nini? Ngoja nikuambie.” Enyi wanadamu, nimewaambia yaliyo mema, na ninalotaka kwako, ila kutenda haki, na kupenda rehema, na kwenda kwa unyenyekevu na Mungu wako (Mika 6:8). Tunahitaji kutenda haki: Tunahitaji kufanya yaliyo sawa. Tunaishi katika jamii isiyomcha Mungu ambapo inaonekana kwamba kila mtu anafanya kile kinachoonekana kuwa sawa machoni pake mwenyewe (Waamuzi 21:25b). Haki ni sawa hata kama hakuna anayeifanya. Nuhu alijenga safina yake katikati ya jamii isiyomcha Mungu (tazama maelezo ya Mwanzo Ca – Wana wa Mungu Walioa Binti za Wanadamu). Ulimwengu wa dhuluma na uovu. Shetani bado ndiye mtawala wa ulimwengu huu. Lakini kosa ni kosa hata kama kila mtu anafanya hivyo. Wema ni pale tunapofanya yaliyo sawa, kama Nuhu.

Hatupaswi tu kufanya yaliyo sawa, lakini tunapaswa kufanya kwa njia sahihi na kwa sababu sahihi. Tunapaswa kupenda rehema (Kiebrania: chesed). Neno la Kiebrania chesed likitumiwa mara 248 hivi katika TaNaKh, halina sawa na Kiingereza.

 

2024-08-01T11:13:20+00:000 Comments
Go to Top