Jesus Heals a Man With a Shriveled Hand
Matthew 12:9-14; Mark 3:1-6; Luke 6:6-11
Jesus heals a man with a shriveled hand DIG: What causes the tension in the synagogue? Why was the man with the shriveled hand there to begin with? Why did Yeshua question the religious leaders as He did? Why did Jesus provoke the Pharisees’ wrath by healing on the Sabbath? Couldn’t He just wait one more day? What prompts the Lord’s anger? What does their response show? What is the irony in Mark 3:4-6?
REFLECT: Is it easy or hard for you to admit you’re wrong? What does it take to get you to change your mind about something regarding your faith? How do you handle stubborn people who you really care about, but won’t change either their destructive thinking or actions? What is the “shriveled hand” that Jesus is healing in you right now? How is true righteousness gained?
As Jesus traveled around, members of the Sanhedrin went with Him (to see link click Lg – the Great Sanhedrin). Like detectives, they trailed Him. Did they travel behind and keep their distance? Or did they travel with Jesus and talk along the way. We have no way of knowing because the Bible is silent on the issue. But, like pesky mosquitoes that wouldn’t leave Him alone on a hot summer’s day, the Pharisees and the Torah-teachers were tenacious in their determination to find something to accuse Him of. They weren’t really seeking the truth about Jesus, they were simply looking for a way to prove that His claim of being the Messiah was a lie.
On another Sabbath Jesus went into the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was shriveled. Doctor Luke always gives us more medical details, it was his right hand that was shriveled (Matthew 12:9-10a; Mark 3:1; Luke 6:6). The word shriveled is a perfect participle, speaking of an action completed in past time, but having present finished results. This means that the shriveling of the hand was due to an accident or disease. The man was not born with the deformity, but neither was it life threatening.469 This was no coincidence. The Pharisees chose the man to test the Nazarene because his healing would not be a life-or-death issue (see below). They reasoned that if Yeshua really were God, He would merely wait until the next day to heal him.
The Oral Law (see Ei – The Oral Law) dictated that all work was forbidden on Shabbat. The Pharisees were quite definite and detailed about this. Medical attention could only be given if a life was in danger. To take some examples – a woman in childbirth might be helped on the Sabbath. An affliction of the throat might be treated. If a wall fell on anyone, enough might be cleared away to see whether the person was dead or alive. If alive, the person might be helped; if dead the body could not be removed until the next day. A fracture could not be attended to. Cold water might not be poured on a sprained hand or foot. A cut finger might be bandaged with a plain bandage but not with ointment. In other words, at most, an injury could be kept from getting worse – but not made better.
The best way to understand the strict orthodox view of the Sabbath is to remember that a Jew would not even defend his life on Shabbat. In the Maccabean wars, when resistance broke out, some of the Jewish rebels took refuge in some caves. The Syrian soldiers pursued them. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tell us that they gave them the chance to surrender and they would not, so “the Syrians fought against them on the Sabbath day, and they burned the Jews in the caves, without resistance and without so much as obstructing the entrances to the caves. They refused to defend themselves on that day because they were not willing to break the Sabbath even under such distress.” So the attitude of pharisaic Judaism on this issue was completely rigid and unbending.470
The Torah-teachers and the Pharisees were looking for a reason to accuse Jesus publicly before the Great Sanhedrin. No one could miss them because the front seats where reserved for honored guests and there they sat. The Pharisees were the ones who had repeatedly accused Messiah and His talmidim of breaking the Sabbath one week earlier (see Cv – The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath). They were not there to worship. They were there to scrutinize Jesus’ every action, so they watched Him closely. Because this was the second stage of interrogation, they asked Him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath” (Mt 12:10b; Mk 3:2; Lk 6:7).
But Jesus knew what they were thinking and said to the man with the shriveled hand: Get up and stand in front of everyone. So he got up and stood in the midst of all the people who were there (Mark 3:3; Luke 6:8). Yeshua answered the critical attitude of the Torah-teachers and the Pharisees with a miracle. He knew the man’s life was not in the least danger. Physically, he would be no worse off if his healing were delayed until the following day. The Lord, however, brought everything out into the open, and threw out a challenge to them. He had nothing to hide.
Being a rabbi, the Lord answered their question with a question of His own. Then Messiah said to them: I ask you, which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil? He put them in a corner. They were bound to admit that it was lawful to do good, and that it was a good thing He proposed to do. They were also bound to deny that it was lawful to do evil, and yet, surely it was an evil thing to leave the man in such a wretched condition when it was possible to help him. Then He asked them: Is it lawful to save a life or to destroy it (Luke 6:9)? But they remained silent (Mark 3:4). They didn’t have a snappy comeback for that one! The verb is imperfect. They kept on being silent. Theirs was a painful, embarrassing silence. What could they say? Evidently nothing.
Based on Leviticus 18:5 some of the commandments of Shabbat could be set aside under the concept of pikuach nefesh, literally to save a life. Since God gave the Torah to bless our lives, it is understood to this day that whatever is needed to save a life may be done even on the Sabbath. Maimonides, the great medieval commentator and physician, even called it a “religious duty” to break the Sabbath for such a need (Yad, Shabbat 2:2-3).
After a long silence Jesus said to them: If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out (Tractate Shabbat 117b)? Any Jew, including a Pharisee, would find some way to rescue his sheep in such a situation. If there were a regulation permitting him to do such a thing, he would certainly take advantage of it. If there weren’t, he would find some way of circumventing or bending the law in order to save his sheep. So, either within the Oral Law or in spite of the Oral Law, he would find some way to take hold of his sheep and lift it out of the pit. The Pharisees did not argue that point with Yeshua, proving the assumed answer was correct.
The Lord was using a kal v’chomer rabbinic principle, meaning from lesser to greater. If some of the laws of Shabbat could be set aside to help a needy animal, how much more valuable is a person than a sheep! Jesus then summarized His point, saying: How much more valuable is a person than a sheep! Therefore, it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath, anytime the situation arises, not just in life-threatening situations (Matthew 12:11-12). No Pharisee would have admitted that sheep were as valuable as men, who knew they were created in the image of God. But in reality, the Pharisees treated other people with less respect than they treated their own sheep, because in their hearts they didn’t respect, much less love, anyone else, including their fellow Jews. The only thing that mattered to the Pharisees was their self-righteous sect of Judaism and their precious traditions of men.
Christ looked around at them all in righteous anger. It was a swift, sweeping glare. There are three Greek words for anger. The first is thumos, indicating a sudden outburst of anger that cools off quickly. Secondly, orge, defining tolerant habit of the mind, not being used all the time, but only when the occasion demanded it. But, the qualification is that no sinful motivation be included with it. And thirdly, parorgismos, which speaks of anger in the sense of exasperation, which is forbidden in Scripture. Mark uses the word orge because Yeshua’s anger was a righteous anger. But, our Lord’s anger was still tempered with grief.471
And, deeply distressed at their stubborn hearts, He said to the man: Stretch out your shriveled hand. Jesus had been zealous when He cleansed the Temple to start His public ministry (see Bs – Jesus’ First Cleansing of the Temple), and He was also zealous here. So he stretched it out and his right hand was completely restored, just as sound as the left hand (Mt 12:13; Mark 3:5; Luke 6:10). He did not ask the man to display any faith. At this point in Messiah’s ministry, miracles were to authenticate His messianic claims. But, that will change after His rejection (see En – Four Drastic Changes in Christ’s Ministry). By proceeding to heal his hand, Jesus continued to show His disdain for the Oral Law.
Can you imagine how this man felt? I am sure he hid his shriveled hand as much as he could. He was embarrassed about it. Now Yeshua was asking him to show it to everyone.
The Pharisaic responses to this incident, and to the Sabbath controversies in general are three-fold. First, The Pharisees and the teachers of the Oral Law were furious, literally filled with madness (Lk 6:11a). Their emotions controlled them. Second, the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus (Mt 12:14; Lk 6:11b). They were getting desperate and would have killed Yeshua on the spot had Rome not taken away their ability to issue the death penalty by stoning, and had they not been afraid of the many people who followed and admired Him.472 The Sanhedrin had not yet come to an official conclusion from their second stage of interrogation, but, it seemed like many Pharisees had already come to their own individual conclusion. It was like, “My mind is made up, don’t confuse me with the facts!” Thirdly, the Pharisees went out and began to plot with the Herodians how they might kill the rebellious Rabbi from Galilee (Mk 3:6).
The Pharisees and the Herodians were really strange bedfellows because they were on the opposite ends of the political spectrum, and usually archenemies. The Herodians were theologically in agreement with the Sadducees and politically both of these parties would have been the opposite of the Pharisees who were anti-Hasmonean, anti-Herodian and anti-Roman. The Pharisees looked for a cataclysmic messianic Kingdom to remove the rule of the Herods and Rome, whereas the Herodians wanted to please the Romans and preserve the Herodian rule. However, the Herodians and the Pharisees worked together to oppose Yeshua, because He was introducing a new Kingdom that neither wanted. Therefore, in the final analysis, they could agree on one thing – Jesus needed to be killed.473
The Pharisees and Torah-teachers were self-righteous hypocrites (Matthew 23:24-27), who loved to justify themselves in the sight of others (Luke 16:15). They had cold, calloused hearts and their acts of piety only served to glorify themselves, not ADONAI. A disciple of Yeshua Ha’Meshiach must go beyond self-righteousness that was often characterized by external pious acts (Matthew 5:20). We don’t need external boasting, but internal change. Rabbi Sha’ul wrote of the condition of the human heart: There is no one righteous, not even one (Romans 3:10). The only righteousness that is possible is that which is given to us by God through His grace, as a free and generous gift (Ephesians 2:8-9). It is righteousness gained through the cross of Messiah and does not come from ourselves, but rather, through faith and baptism of the Holy Spirit (see Bw – What God Does for Us at the Moment of Faith).
As we start to understand this truth, we begin to understand that on our own, we cannot please God. Our self-sufficient lives must be put aside in favor of a childlike trust and reliance on our loving Father. Only those who have put their wills to death in this way can truly follow Jesus. Renouncing all self-righteousness, we rejoice with Rabbi Sha’ul and say: I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in my body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me (Galatians 2:20).474
Lord Jesus, by the power of your Spirit in us, help us to follow You. Teach us to love as You love, so that we may build Your Kingdom on the earth. Amen
Leave A Comment