–Save This Page as a PDF–  
 

Historical Details Related to
First Kings 3:1 to 4:34

This section is lengthy and describes the first years of Solomon’s rule and the fame he gained during that time. Foreign and domestic political situations are mentioned as are religious, literary and commercial issues. Since First Kings Chapters 1-2 establishes Solomon as the successor of David, then First Kings Chapters 3-4 indicates how Solomon began to fill the rather large void left by his father.

Most of the events of Chapters 3-4 occur during the first three years of Solomon’s rule (970-966 BC). At least they are told before construction on the Temple began in the fourth year of Solomon’s rule (First Kings 6:1). Three historical details deserve mention: Solomon’s relationship to Egypt, Solomon’s organization of Isra’el into twelve districts, and the extent of the cost of Solomon’s kingdom. These details are interspersed between the chapters’ most important ideas, which are the origin, emergence, and fruit of Solomon’s wisdom.

As has been stated, David left a significant kingdom to his son. He had built a nation largely through conquest. Philistia, Mo’ab, Ammon, Edom, and Syrian had all fallen to his armies. Those nations continued to be under Isra’el’s authority during the first decades of Solomon’s rule, which presented the new king with an administrative problem, not a military one. Since he controlled virtually all the land between Egypt and the Hittite kingdom, Solomon was a major player in international affairs.

Egypt’s pharaoh, most probably Siamun (978-959 BC),71 recognized Solomon’s significance and made an alliance with him by marrying one of his daughters to Isra’el’s king (First Kings 3:1). Perhaps Egypt was weak and needed Solomon’s support at that time, or maybe Egypt thought it would be easier to gain access to Isra’el’s trade routes through negotiation rather than through war. But whatever the reasons, peaceful relations existed with Egypt and Isra’el for some twenty years – until the twenty-first dynasty was superseded by Shishak in 945 BC.72 Having Egypt as an ally enhanced Solomon’s status even more. When this alliance ceased, however, Egypt actually helped support Jeroboam who eventually split Isra’el into two rival nations (to see link click Dc – A House Divided).

Before Solomon, Isra’el’s government was fairly informal. Sha’ul and David’s kingdoms were not disorganized, but they were forced to focus on waging war rather than managing a peaceful empire. Solomon, on the other hand, was determined to accomplish normal peacetime goals, such as trading and building. Therefore, he divided Isra’el into twelve districts, each of which was ruled by a governor, who was in charge of providing food and supplies for the king and his household; each one was in charge of provisions for one month out of the year (First Kings 4:7). In other words, the governors collected the taxes in their districts that went to support the central government. These districts roughly corresponded with the old tribal areas, but tribal boundaries were often disregarded. Resentment over this redistricting undoubtedly arose, then grew as certain districts struggled to pay their portion.

In any event this was a radical and decisive step, because it imposed upon the people an unprecedented burden. It meant that the fading old tribal system was virtually abolished as far as its political functioning was concerned. In place of the twelve tribes caring in turn for the Temple and the priesthood, there were twelve districts taxed for the support of Solomon’s court.73

Without question, Solomon’s court needed vast sums of money to support its many interests. Besides the king, his harem, and his officials, there were chariot horses and regular army horses to feed (First Kings 4:26). In addition, the nation’s population grew (First Kings 4:20), which required further administrative costs. Since funds could not be gained through warfare, taxes and trade had to provide all the government’s income. Only an extremely wise king would fund all those various interests. But even that type of ruler could not do so for an indefinite period of time.74